The purpose of this clinical trial is to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of the Rheos system in subjects with hypertension that are resistant to treatment with at least three anti-hypertension agents, one of which is a diuretic.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
591
Electrical activation of the Carotid Baroreflex
Percent of Patients With a 10mmHg or Greater Reduction in Office Cuff Systolic Blood Pressure
Compare Group A (Rheos® Device On ) versus Group B (Rheos® Device Off) via a double-blind, randomized, parallel group, super-superiority design for proportion of subjects that achieve at least a 10 mm Hg drop in systolic blood pressure at Month 6 compared to Month 0, with a superiority margin of 20%.
Time frame: 6 months post-activation
Percent of Group A (Rheos® Device On) Patients Who Maintain a 10 mm Hg Drop in Systolic Blood Pressure at 12 Months Post-activation, and Whose Response at 12 Months is at Least 50% of the Response Observed at 6 Months Post-activation.
Compare the sustained response in SBP Month 12 in Group A ( Rheos® Device On ) responders at Month 6 to an objective performance criterion of 65%. A sustained response to therapy required the reduction from Month 0 to Month 12 to be at least 10 mmHg and to remain at least 50% of that seen at Month 6.
Time frame: 12 months post-activation
Serious Procedure- or System-related Adverse Event-free Rate in Both Implanted and Attempted Patients
Compare the serious procedure- or system-related adverse event-free rate for events occurring within 30 days of implant to a pre-specified objective performance criterion of 82% set based on historical literature on implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) and pacemakers. Note: The purpose of this outcome measure was to evaluate the effect of having the device implanted, not to compare the outcomes between the two treatment groups. Therefore, both groups were analyzed as a single cohort.
Time frame: 30 days post implant
Major Hypertension-related and Serious Device-related Adverse Event-Free Rate in Both Implanted and Attempted Patients.
Compare the event-free rate for all major hypertension-related and serious device-related adverse events occurring between 30 days post-implant and the Month 12 visit, to a pre-specified objective performance criterion of 72% based on similar implantable devices such as defibrillators and resynchronization devices. Note: The purpose of this outcome measure was to evaluate the effect of having the device implanted, not to compare the outcomes between the two treatment groups. Therefore, both groups were analyzed as a single cohort.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Apex Cardiology
Inglewood, California, United States
University of Southern California
Los Angeles, California, United States
St Joseph Health
Orange, California, United States
George Washington University Hospital
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
VA Medical Center
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
Jacksonville Center for Clinical Research
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
Florida Hospital Cardiovascular Institute
Orlando, Florida, United States
Pensacola Research Consultants
Pensacola, Florida, United States
The Heart and Vascular Institute of Florida
St. Petersburg, Florida, United States
...and 34 more locations
Time frame: 12 months-post activation
Therapy-related Adverse Event-free Rate.
Compare Group A (Rheos® Device On ) versus Group B (Rheos® Device Off) therapy-related adverse event-free rates via a double-blind, randomized, parallel group, non-inferiority design for therapy-related serious adverse events occurring between 30 days post-implant and the Month 6 visit. The non-inferiority margin was 15%.
Time frame: 6 months post-activation