The diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency (GHD) in adults is established by laboratory testing in patients with an appropriate clinical history of hypothalamic pituitary disease. Two tests that are considered to be gold standard tests for the diagnosis of GHD are the insulin tolerance test (ITT) and growth hormone releasing hormone (GHRH) combined with L-arginine (L-ARG). However, these tests are either bothersome (given intravenously) to the patient or are linked with side effects. Therefore, an orally available compound like AEZS-130 (formerly ARD-07), if demonstrated to be safe and providing adequate sensitivity and specificity could be a welcome alternative and/or complement to the current available tests. The intent was to recruit 40 adult GHD (AGHD) patients and 40 healthy control subjects into this trial, but the original sponsor (Ardana Biosciences Ltd.) discontinued the study for financial reasons before this was completed. At the time of withdrawal of GHRH from the market in 2008, 42 AGHD patients and 10 normal controls had completed the study at 9 US sites. This study reactivated to complete the remaining 30 matched control subjects. Additionally upon agreement with the FDA in a Special Protocol Assessment (SPA), 10 additional adult growth hormone deficient and their matched control were planned to be enrolled into this trial for a total treated population of approximatively 100 subjects.
Thirty control subjects (i.e., without AGHD) were matched to the 30 AGHD patients who were not previously matched. Matching was based upon gender, age, BMI, and estrogen status for females. They received one oral dose of AEZS-130 followed by serial blood draws for growth hormone (GH), insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) and pharmacokinetic (PK) determinations. There was no cross over due to the unavailability of GHRH (Geref) in the United States. Under Amendment #4 to this protocol, 10 additional AGHD subjects were to be enrolled and matched as described above. Furthermore, the objective of the study was changed to delete comparison with L-ARG + GHRH.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
101
A single oral administration of AEZS-130 as Growth Hormone Stimulation Test
A single administration of L-ARG+GHRH (iv bolus) followed by a 30min infusion of L-ARG as Growth Hormone Stimulation Test
Celerion
Tempe, Arizona, United States
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, United States
Harbor-UCLA Medical Center
Torrance, California, United States
Northwestern University
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Radiant Research Inc.
Chicago, Illinois, United States
John Hopkins University
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Celerion
Lincoln, Nebraska, United States
Celerion
Neptune City, New Jersey, United States
Oregon Health & Science University
Portland, Oregon, United States
...and 3 more locations
Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Analysis on Peak GH (Growth Hormon) Concentrations
The primary endpoint for each individual is the peak GH concentration following AEZS-130 (macimorelin) administration.
Time frame: GH sampling: pre-dose and 30, 45, 60, 75, 90, 120, 150 min post-dose
Peak Insulin-Like Growth Factor (IGF)-1 Concentration Following Treatment
Descriptive summaries for IGF-1 and correlation with GH concentrations based on macimorelin treatment. Mean IGF-1 values taken pre- and post- macimorelin administration.
Time frame: 15 min. before macimorelin administration and at 150 min after macimorelin administration
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) Analysis of Peak Growth Hormone (GH) Following Macimorelin Administration
The CART Analysis for macimorelin estimated: a) a macimorelin cut-point that minimized the misclassification of AGHD patients and healthy control subjects; b) an optimal decision tree for macimorelin that incorporated age, sex and BMI. Sensitivity (correct identification of AGHD cases) and specificity (correct identification of control subjects) for macimorelin was summarized for age, gender, BMI and estrogen status subgroups containing n \> 10. At least 8 of the 10 newly enrolled AGHD patients should have been correctly classified for a protocol pre-specified threshold of Peak GH concentration which was 8.5 (ng/ml). Software CART Version 6.0 was used.
Time frame: GH sampling: pre-dose and 30, 45, 60, 75, 90, 120, 150 min post-dose
Number of Participants With Drug Related Adverse Events (AEs)
Total number of participants with drug related AEs, following macimorelin administration of L-Arginine (ARG) - Growth Hormone Releasing Hormone (GHRH) administration.
Time frame: 14 days
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.