The purpose of the study is to identify if the combined use of cardiac troponin enzyme (cTnT) and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) can predict Heart Failure (HF)improvement and all-cause mortality in patients implanted with cardiac pacemaker-defibrillation devices (CRT-D). Novel biochemical markers identifying patients with high risk cardiac mortality detected by plasma protein analysis will also be evaluated. Hypothesis #1: The combined use of cTnT and BNP at just before implant will predict and risk stratify all cause mortality or HF hospitalization up to 12 months. Hypothesis #2: The change in levels of said biomarkers at different points of follow-up can predict response to CRT through 12 months. Hypothesis #3: The levels of a panel of novel inflammatory mediators, namely chemokines, will be correlated with improvement in 6-minute walk testing, quality of life, and left ventricular ejection fraction in CRT patients.
Primary Endpoint The primary endpoint is the occurrence of either death or first HF hospitalization. HF hospitalizations must satisfy both of the following criteria: 1. Admission to hospital for \>24 hours with at least one of the following HF worsening symptoms: * Increased CHF class * Orthopnea * Paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea * Edema * Dyspnea on exertion, or * Gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms attributable to HF * Placement on the Status I heart transplant list AND 2. One or more of the following intensive treatment(s) for HF within 24 hours of admission: * Intravenous (IV) diuresis * IV inotropic medications prescribed during the hospitalization, or * Increasing frequency of dialysis for patients with chronic renal failure 2.3 Secondary Endpoints Secondary endpoints include: * Cause of death * Change in NYHA functional class * Number of HF related hospitalizations * Performance on a standard 6-minute hall walk test * Quality of Life as measured by the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure (MLWHFQ) questionnaire * Patient global clinical assessment * Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) measured by echocardiography * LV volume measured by echocardiography * LV lead placement position * QRS duration at baseline and with CRT * Number of AT/AF, VT/VF episodes * Frequency of appropriate/inappropriate ICD therapy * % Atrial and Ventricular Pacing * Antiarrhythmic drug utilization * Study related complications 2.3.1 Response to CRT 1. A positive response to CRT is defined by the following: Improvement in NYHA functional class by at least one grade 2. Improvement in echocardiographic LVEF \& left ventricular end diastolic index (LVEDI) 3. Improvement in patient global clinical assessment 4. Improvement in 6-minute hall walk by 10%
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
222
Implantation of a CRT-D device
Veterans' Adminstration Pittsburgh Healthcare System
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
All Cause Death
Time frame: 1 year follow up
First Heart Failure Hospitalization
Time frame: 1 year follow up
• Cause of death and ejection fraction
Time frame: 1 year follow up
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.