This is a study to confirm the superior efficacy of GSK1358820 over placebo in patients with equinus deformity associated with post-stroke lower limb spasticity using the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) ankle score.
This is a study to confirm the superior efficacy of GSK1358820 over placebo in patients with equinus deformity associated with post-stroke lower limb spasticity using the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) ankle score.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
120
botulinum toxin type A
Placebo
GSK Investigational Site
Fukuoka, Japan
GSK Investigational Site
Hiroshima, Japan
Area Under the Curve (AUC) for the Change From Baseline in Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) Ankle Score to the End of the DB Phase (Week 12)
Change from baseline in MAS ankle score using a 6-point scale (0, 1, 1+ \[regarded as 1.5\], 2, 3, and 4; 0=no increase in muscle tone; 4=affected part\[s\] rigid in flexion/extension) to each time point in the DB phase was calculated. In the graph plotting time points on the horizontal axis and changes from baseline on the vertical axis, the area surrounded by the MAS ankle score change curve and the horizontal axis was calculated and used as a summary index (AUC) for assessment of the MAS ankle score. Negative changes from baseline indicate improvement, and the AUC has a negative sign.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Mean Change From Baseline in the MAS Ankle Score From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind Phase
The investigator assessed Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) ankle score using a 6-point scale (0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, and 4; 0=No increase in muscle tone to 4=Affected part\[s\] rigid in flexion or extension) at each time point in the double-blind phase. The "+1" (slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder \[less than half\] of ROM \[range of motion\]) of MAS score is regarded as score 1.5.
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12
Mean Change From Baseline in the Physician's Rating Score (PRS) From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind Phase
The investigator assessed the PRS of gait pattern consisting of 3 parameters. Affected limb was scored on a scale of -1 (worst) to 9 (best) based on 3 parameters (initial foot contact, foot contact at midstance, gait assistive devices) at each time point in double-blind phase.
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12
Mean Change From Baseline in the Time (Seconds) to Walk 10 Meters From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind Phase
The time (seconds) required to walk 10 meters was measured at each time point in the double-blind phase.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
GSK Investigational Site
Hiroshima, Japan
GSK Investigational Site
Hokkaido, Japan
GSK Investigational Site
Hokkaido, Japan
GSK Investigational Site
Hokkaido, Japan
GSK Investigational Site
Hokkaido, Japan
GSK Investigational Site
Ibaraki, Japan
GSK Investigational Site
Kanagawa, Japan
GSK Investigational Site
Kanagawa, Japan
...and 10 more locations
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12
Mean Change From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Investigator From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind Phase
The CGI of functional disability was assessed at each visit using the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (-5=Worst Possible to 5=Best Possible) at each time point in the double-blind phase.
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12
Mean Change From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Participant From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind Phase
The CGI of functional disability was assessed at each visit using the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (-5=Worst Possible to 5=Best Possible) at each time point in the double-blind phase
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12
Mean Change From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Physiotherapist/Occupational Therapist From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind Phase
The CGI of functional disability was assessed at each visit using the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (-5=Worst Possible to 5=Best Possible) at each time point in the double-blind phase
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12
Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the MAS Ankle Score at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase
The investigator assessed Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) ankle score using a 6-point scale (0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, and 4; 0=No increase in muscle tone to 4=Affected part\[s\] rigid in flexion or extension) at each time point from baseline (at the start of the double-blind phase) to Week 48. The "+1" (slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder \[less than half\] of ROM \[range of motion\]) of MAS score is regarded as score 1.5.
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, and 12 after each injection (up to Week 48; injections given from Week 12 to Week 36)
Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Physician's Rating Score (PRS) at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase
The investigator assessed the PRS of gait pattern consisting of 3 parameters. Affected limb was scored on a scale of -1 (worst) to 9 (best) based on 3 parameters (initial foot contact, foot contact at midstance, gait assistive devices) at each time point from baseline (at the start of the double-blind phase) to Week 48.
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, and 12 after each injection (up to Week 48; injections given from Week 12 to Week 36)
Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Time (Seconds) to Walk 10 Meters at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase
The time (seconds) required to walk 10 meters was measured at each time point from baseline (at the start of the double-blind phase) to Week 48.
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, and 12 after each injection (up to Week 48; injections given from Week 12 to Week 36)
Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Investigator at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase
The CGI of functional disability was assessed at each visit using the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (-5=Worst Possible to 5=Best Possible) at each time point from baseline (at the start of the double-blind phase) to Week 48.
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, and 12 after each injection (up to Week 48; injections given from Week 12 to Week 36)
Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Participant at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase
The CGI of functional disability was assessed at each visit using the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (-5=Worst Possible to 5=Best Possible) at each time point from baseline (at the start of the double-blind phase) to Week 48.
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, and 12 after each injection (up to Week 48; injections given from Week 12 to Week 36)
Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the DB Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Physiotherapist/Occupational Therapist at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase
The CGI of functional disability was assessed at each visit using the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (-5=Worst Possible to 5=Best Possible) at each time point from baseline (at the start of the double-blind phase) to Week 48.
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, and 12 after each injection (up to Week 48; injections given from Week 12 to Week 36)