The purpose of this study is to learn how to help veterans play a stronger role in shaping their mental health care. Specifically we want to see if we can help veterans improve their mental health treatment by helping them decide if they want to involve family in their mental health treatment, and if so, how. The study will compare a "family member provider" program to an "enhanced treatment as usual approach" in achieving these goals.
Previous research demonstrates that when families are active participants in the clinical care of persons with SMI, veterans experience improved outcomes, including treatment retention, vocational services participation, and empowerment. Numerous controlled trials show that when family involvement achieves the level of intensity and family psychoeducation (FPE), relapse rates are cut in half, and treatment adherence, clinical symptoms, and patient functioning are improved. However, despite these demonstrated benefits, rates of family involvement in the VA are unacceptably low. Even minimal family-clinician contact occurs for only one third of VA SMI patients, a lower rate than in non-VA systems of care. Therefore, it is not surprising that FPE, an intensive form of family-clinician contact, is almost never offered in the VA. In fact, a national VA survey conducted within the last three years indicated that 0% of VAs offer FPE programs conforming to EBP guidelines. Our previous experience further suggests that these deficits in care are due to combinations of provider, patient, and family factors, and that the VA presents specific challenges to implementing existing model programs, including FPE. We therefore believe it is necessary to approach the challenge of increasing family involvement in a step-wise fashion, first by engaging families in the processes of care, before trying to enlist them in more intensive programs such as FPE. Further, family engagement would likely be most effective if it builds on a foundation that empowers consumers to make informed choices regarding the involvement of relatives in care. Our group has developed and piloted a new, family-engagement approach that is gradual, patient-centered, recovery-based, and can address various barriers to improving care. It is manualized and thus replicable. The proposed study will implement and further evaluate this intervention, the brief Family Member Provider Outreach (FMPO).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
238
Family Member Provider Outreach is a brief recovery oriented model. THe FMPO meets with the consumer for 2-3 sessions and with the family for 2-3 sessions with the consumer's permission.
Enhanced treatment as usual. In this condition, the consumer is given a list of family services available including the family intervention team.
VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, West Los Angeles, CA
West Los Angeles, California, United States
Baltimore VA Medical Center VA Maryland Health Care System, Baltimore, MD
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Family-Clinician Contact (Including Contact With FMPO Clinician)
Chart review looking at the any clinician contact with veteran's family members
Time frame: Within 6 months of intervention
Family-Clinician Contact (Not Including Notes From FMPO Clinicians)
Chart review looking at the any clinician contact with veteran's family members
Time frame: Within 6 months of intervention
Consumer's Recovery Rating - MHRM Total Score
We measured recovery attitudes and beliefs with the Mental Health Recovery Measure (MHRM), a 30-item self-report measure that has a total score and eight subscales.The MHRM scales range from 0-120, with a higher score indicating better recovery.
Time frame: Within 6 months of intervention
Consumer's Recovery Rating - MHRM - Overcoming Stuckness Sub Score
We measured recovery attitudes and beliefs with the Mental Health Recovery Measure (MHRM), a 30-item self-report measure that has a total score and eight subscales. This sub score is Overcoming Stuckness.The MHRM sub scales range from 0-16, with a higher score indicating better recovery.
Time frame: Within 6 month of the intervention
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.