A multicentre, open, RCT to assess the safety and efficacy of the Navigator Guided Circulatory Management System versus conventional care in post-operative cardiac surgery patients. The purpose of the study is to demonstrate that the real time acquisition and subsequent processing and display of data produced by the Navigator guided circulatory management system provides the clinician with appropriate data and guidance to achieve and maintain a prescribed target haemodynamic stability in the post operative patient when compared to conventional care in an Intensive Care Unit setting.
Protocol No. AP2006-01 Study title: A Prospective, Open, Randomised, Multicentre, Controlled Group Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Navigator versus Conventional Care in Postoperative Cardiac Surgery Patients Undergoing Coronary Bypass Grafting and or Heart Valve Repair or Replacement Utilizing Heart Lung Perfusion Pump. Acronym: NAV 1 Type of study: Device Trial Sponsor: Applied Physiology Pty Ltd Study device: Navigator Guided Circulatory Care Management System Route of Administration: Via Touch Panel Computer, externally connected to the bedside physiological monitor in a critical care environment Study centres: Six Australian centres Study design: Multicentre, open, randomised, controlled group study Total sample size: One hundred completed patients, 50 in each arm Study population: Post operative coronary bypass and heart valve repair or replacement patients admitted to a Cardiac Intensive Care or Intensive Care Unit. Surgery must involve the use of a heart lung perfusion pump and the patient must have a functioning arterial line and Swan Ganz catheter in situ to enable the measurement of Cardiac Output, Mean Arterial Pressure, and Right Atrial Pressure. Study regimen: Following surgery, and after meeting inclusion and exclusion criteria, patients will be randomised on admission to ICU to receive care guided by Navigator or conventional care during their ICU stay while CO is being monitored. All patients will be connected to the Navigator; the screen of the patients in the control group will have the graphical section blank, the right hand side will display actual values of MAP, CO and RAP as slaved from the bedside monitor, along with the patient's screening and randomisation number and initials. The arm of the study to which the patient has been randomised ;control/Navigator, will also be shown. Endpoints: Primary: The primary efficacy endpoint is the average distance to the central point of the target cardiovascular zone over the period the patient is connected to Navigator. Secondary: Secondary endpoints for the trial will be: * Percentage time in the target cardiovascular zone over the period the patient is connected to the Navigator * Clinically significant atrial fibrillation over the period the patient is connected to the Navigator. This is defined as irregular supraventricular rhythm with an absence of discrete P waves lasting more than ten minutes documented and confirmed with an ECG * Multiple organ function, as assessed using the SOFA score, calculated daily * Navigator device related adverse events and device failures Statistical analysis: The primary and secondary endpoints and all safety data will be analysed on the randomised Intention-to-treat population.The ITT population will include all individuals who are randomised. The analysis will compare the primary efficacy endpoint between the two randomised treatment groups using independent t tests. The secondary analyses will compare the secondary endpoints between the two randomised treatment groups using independent t-tests, Chi-square tests and Fisher's exact tests as appropriate. Study Period: From the first pre-surgery screening visit to the post operative follow up visit, approximately six weeks
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
112
Navigator circulatory mgt system
Conventional haemodynamic care
St Vincent's Public Hospital
Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Royal North Shore Hospital
Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Westmead Private Hospital
Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Westmead Public Hospital
Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
St George Public Hospital
Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Monash Medical Centre
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
The Alfred Hospital
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Average distance to central point of the target cardiovascular zone while connected to the device
Time frame: Time connected to Navigator device
Percentage time in the target cardiovascular zone while connected to device
Time frame: Time connected to Navigator device
Clinically significant AF while connected to device
Time frame: Time connected to Navigator device
Multiple organ function (SOFA score)
Time frame: From connection to Navigator device to hospital discharge
Device-related adverse events and device failures
Time frame: Time connected to Navigator device
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.