This is a 12 month study designed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of SB-751689 in the treatment of osteoporosis in post-menopausal women, in comparison with 2 active comparators and placebo.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
564
Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Marrow Density (BMD) at Month 12 Measured by Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DXA) Scans of the Lumbar Spine (L1-L4)
DXA scanners from Hologic and GE Lunar was used to measure BMD by a DXA scan. At least two vertebrae (L1-L4) that were suitable for measurement of BMD were evaluated. The same scanner was used throughout the study for all measurements for a given participant. DXA scans were sent to a central reading facility for quality control and central analysis. Assessments performed on Day 0 were considered as Baseline. Percent change from Baseline was computed as (change from baseline / baseline value) \* 100%. Percent change from Baseline in areal bone mineral density (aBMD) was reported.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) and 12 Months
Number of Participants With Hypercalcemia
Participants with albumin-adjusted serum calcium pre-dose values of \>11.0 mg/ deciliter (dL) or post-dose values of \>12.0 mg/dL were recorded as participants with hypercalcemia. Number of participant with hypercalcemia were reported.
Time frame: Up to Month 12
Number of Participants Withdrew Due to Hypercalcemia
A confirmed albumin-adjusted serum calcium pre-dose value of \>11.0 mg/dL or post-dose value of \>12.0 mg/dL was set as a withdrawal criteria for the study. Number of participants who met this pre-defined stopping criteria were reported.
Time frame: Up to Month 12
Number of Participant With Laboratory Abnormalities of Potential Clinical Concern at Any Post-baseline Visit
The hematology parameters analyzed were white blood cells (WBC) count with differential WBC count, red blood cells, haemoglobin, haematocrit, mean corpuscular volume and platelet count. The clinical chemistry parameters analyzed were sodium, potassium, calcium, calcium (albumin adjusted), phosphate, bicarbonate, creatinine, bilirubin (total), alanine amino transferase, aspartate amino transferase, glucose, albumin, alkaline phosphatase, creatine phosphokinase, urea, uric acid, total protein, 25-OH vitamin D, 1,25-2(OH) vitamin D, whole parathyroid hormone (PTH 1-84)) and intact PTH (1-84 and 7-84). Only those parameters for which at least one value of potential clinical importance was reported are summarized. The number of participants with potential clinical important laboratory findings at any visit were reported.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
GSK Investigational Site
Oakland, California, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Palm Desert, California, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Walnut Creek, California, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Decatur, Georgia, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Akron, Ohio, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Portland, Oregon, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Duncansville, Pennsylvania, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
...and 39 more locations
Time frame: Up to Month 12
Number of Participant With Vital Signs of Potential Clinical Concern at Any Post-baseline Visit
The potential clinical importance ranges (low and high) of the vital sign parameters-systolic blood pressure (\> 30 millimeter of mercury \[mmHg\] decrease from Baseline, \> 30 mmHg increase from Baseline), diastolic blood pressure (\> 20 mmHg decrease from Baseline and \> 20 mmHg increase from Baseline) and heart rate (\<45 and \>120 beats per minute). Only those parameters for which at least one value of potential clinical importance was reported are summarized. The number of participants with potential clinical important vital parameter findings at any visit were reported.
Time frame: Up to 12 Months
Number of Participant With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings Reported as Adverse Event
Full 12-lead ECGs pre-dose at screening and visits 6, 8, 11, 12 and 14 were recorded. Participants rested supine or seated for at least 10 minutes before each reading. All ECGs were transmitted to a central reviewer for blinded assessment. The central reviewer measured the following parameters and provide a clinical interpretation: heart rate, RR interval, PR interval, QRS interval, QT (uncorrected) interval, QTcB (Bazett's correction) interval, QTcF (Fridericia's correction) interval. The central reviewer was provided the investigator or designated qualified site physician with a central ECG report or confirmatory report to assist them in identifying any clinically significant abnormalities that would preclude the participant from further participation in the study.
Time frame: Up to 12 months
Mean Change From Baseline in Height
Assessments performed on Day 0 were considered as Baseline. Change from Baseline was computed as values at post baseline visit minus Baseline value. Mean change from baseline in height at Month 6 and 12 and early withdrawal were reported.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Month 6, 12 and early withdrawal
Mean Change From Baseline in Weight
Baseline values were assessed on Day 0. Change from Baseline was computed as values at post baseline visit minus Baseline value. Mean change from baseline in weight at Month 6, 12 and early withdrawal were reported.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Month 6, 12 and early withdrawal
Percent Change From Baseline to Month 6 in BMD Measured by DXA Scans of the Lumbar Spine (L1-L4)
DXA scanners from Hologic and GE Lunar was used to measure BMD by a DXA scan. At least two vertebrae (L1-L4) that were suitable for measurement of BMD were evaluated. The same scanner was used throughout the study for all measurements for a given participant. DXA scans were sent to a central reading facility for quality control and central analysis. Baseline values were assessed on Day 0. Percent Change from Baseline was computed as (change from baseline / baseline value) \* 100%. Percent change from baseline to month 6 in aBMD was reported.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) and Month 6
Percent Change From Baseline to Months 6 and 12 in BMD Measured by DXA Scans of the Hip (Total Hip, Femoral Neck and Trochanter).
DXA scanners from Hologic and GE Lunar was used to measure BMD by a DXA scan. At least two vertebrae (L1-L4) that were suitable for measurement of BMD were evaluated. The same scanner was used throughout the study for all measurements for a given participant. DXA scans were sent to a central reading facility for quality control and central analysis. Baseline values were assessed on Day 0. Percent Change from Baseline was computed as (change from baseline / baseline value) \* 100%. Percent change from baseline to month 6 and 12 in aBMD of hip (total hip, femoral neck and trochanter) were reported.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Month 6 and Month 12
Number of Participants Who Remained the Same or Had Any Improvement in DXA BMD (> Baseline)
Responder rate of participants who remained the same or had any improvement as compared to baseline in DXA BMD of vertebra, femur and vertebra plus femur were reported. Baseline values were assessed on Day 0. Percent change (improvement) from Baseline was computed as (change from baseline / baseline value) \* 100%.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Month 5, 6 and 12
Percent Change From Baseline to Month 12 in the Volumetric Integral, Cortical, and Trabecular Density (BMD) at the Hip and Lumbar Spine as Measured by Quantitative Computer Tomography (QCT) Scans
QCT is a three-dimensional non-projectional technique to quantify BMD with a number of advantages to other densitometric techniques. Cortical and trabecular bone can be separated, trabecular volume of interest (VOI) are largely independent of degenerative changes in the spine and 3 dimensional geometric parameters can be determined. BMD as measured by QCT is a true density measured in g/cm\^3 in contrast to DXA Which determines an areal density measured in g/cm\^2. Baseline values were assessed on Day 0. Percent change from Baseline was computed as (change from baseline / baseline value) \* 100%. Percent change from Baseline to month 12 in the volumetric integral, cortical, and trabecular density (BMD) at the hip and lumbar spine measured by QCT were reported.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) and Month 12
Percent Change From Baseline to Month 12 in the Total Vertebra Integral VOI at the Lumbar Spine as Measured by QCT Scans
QCT is a three-dimensional non-projectional technique to quantify BMD with a number of advantages to other densitometric techniques. Cortical and trabecular bone can be separated, trabecular VOI are largely independent of degenerative changes in the spine and 3 dimensional geometric parameters can be determined. BMD as measured by QCT is a true density measured in g/cm\^3 in contrast to DXA Which determines an areal density measured in g/cm\^2. Baseline values were assessed on Day 0. Percent change from Baseline was computed as (change from baseline / baseline value) \* 100%.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) and Month 12
Percent Change From Baseline to Month 12 in the Volumetric Integral, Cortical, and Trabecular Density (BMD) at the Hip as Measured by QCT Scans
QCT is a three-dimensional non-projectional technique to quantify BMD with a number of advantages to other densitometric techniques. Cortical and trabecular bone can be separated, trabecular VOI are largely independent of degenerative changes in the spine and 3 dimensional geometric parameters can be determined. BMD as measured by QCT is a true density measured in mg/cm\^3 in contrast to DXA Which determines an areal density measured in g/cm\^2. Baseline values were assessed on Day 0. Percent change from Baseline was computed as (change from baseline / baseline value) \* 100%.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) and Month 12
Percent Change From Baseline to Month 12 in Cortical Thickness at the Hip as Measured by QCT Scans
Percent change in thickness of femur neck cortical VOI thickness and trochanter cortical VOI thickness were at Month 12 measured by QCT were reported. Assessments performed on Day 0 were considered as Baseline. Percent change from Baseline was computed as (change from baseline / baseline value) \* 100%.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) and Month 12
Biochemical Markers of Bone Turnover: Levels of C-terminal Telopeptide α1 Chain of Type 1 Collagen (CTX1)
Blood samples were collected at Baseline (Day 0), Week 4, Month 3, 6, and 12 for measurement of CTX1.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Week 4, Month 3, 6, and 12
Biochemical Markers of Bone Turnover: Procollagen Type 1 N-terminal Propeptide (P1NP)
Blood samples were collected at Baseline (Day 0), Week 4, Month 3, 6, and 12 for measurement of P1NP.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Week 4, Month 3, 6, and 12
Biochemical Markers of Bone Turnover: Bone Specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BALP)
Blood samples were collected at Baseline (Day 0), Week 4, Month 3, 6, and 12 for measurement of BALP.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Week 4, Month 3, 6, and 12
Blood Concentrations of Ronacaleret
Blood samples were collected and analyzed for concentrations of ronacaleret. The individual blood concentration-time data from the intensive PK-PD subgroup of participants were analyzed by standard noncompartmental methods. Blood concentrations of ronacaleret were reported.
Time frame: Pre-dose (0.0 hour [h]) and 12 h post dose at Week 4, 20, 40 min, 1, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, 1-4, 8-12, and 24 h at Month 3, 6 and 12
Area Under the Concentration-time Curve Over the Dosing Interval (AUC 0-t) and Area Under the Concentration-time Curve Over the Dosing Interval (AUC 0-tau) of Ronacaleret
Blood samples were collected and analyzed for concentrations of ronacaleret. The individual blood concentration-time data from the intensive pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics subgroup of participants were analyzed by standard noncompartmental methods. Blood samples were collected and analyzed for concentrations of ronacaleret. The individual blood concentration-time data from the intensive PK-PD subgroup of participants were analyzed by standard noncompartmental methods. Following log transformation, AUC(0-t) and AUC(0-τ) of ronacaleret were separately analyzed by ANOVA using mixed effects model, fitting treatment and country/region as fixed effects.
Time frame: Pre-dose (0.0 h) and 12 h post dose at Week 4, 20, 40 min, 1, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, 1-4, 8-12, and 24 h at Month 3, 6 and 12
Maximum Blood Concentration (Cmax) of Ronacaleret
Blood samples were collected and analyzed for concentrations of ronacaleret. The individual blood concentration-time data from the intensive pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics subgroup of participants were analyzed by standard noncompartmental methods. Blood samples were collected and analyzed for concentrations of ronacaleret. The individual blood concentration-time data from the intensive PK-PD subgroup of participants were analyzed by standard noncompartmental methods. Following log transformation, Cmax of ronacaleret were separately analyzed by ANOVA using mixed effects model, fitting treatment and country/region as fixed effects.
Time frame: Pre-dose (0.0 h) and 12 h post dose at Week 4, 20, 40 min, 1, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, 1-4, 8-12, and 24 h at Month 3, 6 and 12
Time Required to Achieve Maximum Concentration of Ronacaleret in Blood (Tmax)
Blood samples were collected and analyzed for concentrations of ronacaleret. The individual blood concentration-time data from the intensive pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics subgroup of participants were analyzed by standard noncompartmental methods.
Time frame: Pre-dose (0.0 h) and 12 h post dose at Week 4, 20, 40 min, 1, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, 1-4, 8-12, and 24 h at Month 3, 6 and 12