The purpose of this study is to investigate the performance of paclitaxel-coated balloon expandable stainless steel coronary stent for the treatment of infrapopliteal stenoses and occlusions in patients with critical limb ischemia compared to percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty (PTA).
Critical limb ischemia (CLI) is a serious condition that is becoming more and more common in the western world due to the growing percentage of elderly in the population and the rising incidence of diabetes. In about 40% of patients a stenosis or occlusion in the arteries below the level of the knee will be present. Restoration of blood flow is imperative to allow pain relief and tissue healing. Without revascularization patients with CLI are at risk for limb loss and potentially fatal complications such as sepsis. In patients treated with percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty (PTA)significant restenosis is found in approximately 50% after 6 months. In interventional cardiology a significant reduction in restenosis rates in coronary arteries has been found using drug eluting stents (DES), including the paclitaxel eluting stent (TAXUS, Boston Scientific). DES locally deliver drugs (e.g. paclitaxel) that interfere with the restenosis process. Using DES in treating below the knee (infrapopliteal) arterial lesions in patients with CLI may improve patency and clinical outcome. Comparison: Treatment of below the knee arterial lesions in patients with CLI with PTA and DES compared to only PTA.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
144
PTA with placement of paclitaxel-eluting stent
PTA
HagaZiekenhuis, location Leyweg
The Hague, South Holland, Netherlands
Sint Antonius Ziekenhuis
Nieuwegein, Utrecht, Netherlands
University Medical Center Utrecht (UMCU)
Utrecht, Netherlands
The primary endpoint will be primary patency of the treated site at 6 months. Primary patency is defined as <50% loss of luminal diameter at the treated site on CT arteriography (CTA) without re-intervention in the interim.
Time frame: 6 months
Primary patency of the treated sites at 3, 6 and 12 months after intervention assessed by duplex sonography (binary patency, <50% stenosis defined as PSV ratio <2.0)
Time frame: 3, 6, 12 months
Clinical evaluation of the treated ischemic leg at 3, 6 and 12 months.
Time frame: 3, 6, 12 months
Major amputation (at or above the ankle) of the trial leg at 3, 6 and 12 months
Time frame: 3, 6, 12 months
Minor amputation (below the ankle excluding the toes) of the trial leg at 3, 6 and 12 months.
Time frame: 3, 6, 12 months
Infrapopliteal surgical bypass of the trial leg at 3, 6 and 12 months.
Time frame: 3, 6, 12 months
Infrapopliteal endovascular re-intervention of the trial leg at 3, 6 and 12 months.
Time frame: 3, 6, 12 months
Peri-procedural (within 30 days) complications.
Time frame: 30 days
Death.
Time frame: 3, 6, 12 months
Clinical assessment primarily by Rutherford score for peripheral arterial disease
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Clinical assessment outpatient clinic
Time frame: 2, 3, 4 and 5 years after treatment
Target lesion patency by means of duplex sonography
During outpatient clinic visits
Time frame: 2, 3, 4 and 5 years after treatment
Major amputation (at or above the ankle) of treated limb
Assessment up to 5 years after treatment during outpatient clinic visits From 5 to 10 years by means of yearly evaluation of patient charts
Time frame: yearly up to 10 years after treatment
Minor amputation (below the ankle excluding the toes) of the trial leg at 3, 6 and 12 months.
From 2 to 5 years during outpatient clinic visits From 5 to 10 years yearly evaluation of patient charts
Time frame: yearly up to 10 years after treatment
Endovascular or surgical re-intervention of target lesion
Follow-up until first re-intervention of target lesion
Time frame: 3, 6, 12 months, 2,3,4 and 5 years after inclusion