In this study, the efficacy and safety of two nilotinib doses, 300 mg twice daily and 400 mg twice daily, were compared with imatinib 400 mg once daily in newly diagnosed patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia in the chronic phase (CML-CP). An extension protocol was included in this study design to allow patients who did not show sufficient response to their assigned treatments the opportunity to receive imatinib 400 mg BID (option available until protocol amendment 7) or nilotinib 400 mg BID, using an abbreviated safety and efficacy assessment schedule.
Primary objectives of this study: * Compared the efficacy (major molecular response (MMR) rate at 12 months) of nilotinib at 400 mg bid with that of imatinib 400 mg qd in newly diagnosed, previously untreated Ph+ CML-CP patients. * Compared the efficacy (MMR rate at 12 months) of nilotinib at 300 mg bid with that of imatinib 400 mg qd in newly diagnosed, previously untreated Ph+ CML-CP patients. The Primary objectives of Extension Phase of the study: \- Characterized the safety and tolerability profile of nilotinib 400 mg BID after failure of imatinib or insufficiently responded to nilotinib 300 mg BID therapy and the safety and tolerability profile of imatinib therapy after failure of nilotinib therapy. The study was designed to determine whether the treatment of newly diagnosed, previously untreated Ph+ CML-CP patients with either nilotinib 300 mg bid or 400 mg bid demonstrated improved efficacy compared to imatinib 400 mg qd. The primary efficacy endpoint was the rate of MMR defined as the proportion of patients who achieved ≥ 3 log reduction in BCR-ABL transcripts compared to either the standardized Baseline established in the IRIS trial (International Randomized Interferon versus STI571) (Cortes et al 2005) or to the BCR-ABL ratio ≤ 0.1% by International Scale, as detected by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR) at 12 months. The key secondary endpoint was to compare the rate of durable MMR between nilotinib 300 mg bid with that of imatinib, and of nilotinib 400 mg bid with that of imatinib at 24 months. This report presents the final results of efficacy and safety at the LPLV (21-Aug-2019). The main data analysis was done at the time when all patients completed 12 cycles of treatment (or discontinued earlier). There were two primary comparisons at this time point: the MMR rate of nilotinib 400 mg versus the MMR rate of imatinib 400 mg, and the MMR rate of the nilotinib 300 mg versus the MMR rate of the imatinib 400 mg. Comparisons were done sequentially, i.e. the MMR rate of nilotinib 400 mg versus the MMR rate of imatinib 400 mg was to be compared first; if it was significant at 5% level, the MMR rate of the nilotinib 300 mg versus the MMR rate of the imatinib 400 mg was to be compared. The study had a 90% power to detect a 15% difference between the nilotinib 400 mg arm versus imatinib 400 mg arm assuming that the MMR rate of imatinib is 40% and the MMR rate of nilotinib is 55%. The study also had a 90% power to detect a 15% difference between the nilotinib 300 mg and the imatinib 400 mg arms, if the comparison between the nilotinib 400 mg and the imatinib 400 mg was significant. The second main data analysis was done at the time when all patients completed 24 cycles of treatment (or discontinued earlier). There were two key comparisons at this time point: the rate of durable MMR at 24 months of the nilotinib 400 mg versus the imatinib 400 mg, and the rate of durable MMR at 24 months of the nilotinib 300 mg versus the imatinib 400 mg. In order to control the overall type I error rate at or below 5%, only when the corresponding comparison on the primary efficacy endpoint(s) was (were) significant, the key secondary comparison(s) of the respective nilotinib doses (400 mg bid and/or 300 mg bid) versus imatinib 400 mg qd were tested at two-sided 5% significance level. Patients participating after demonstrating suboptimal response/treatment failure to their assigned study treatment in the core study were offered the option to continue in the extension study and to receive imatinib 400 mg bid (option available only until protocol amendment 7) or nilotinib therapy at a dose of 400 mg bid.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
846
Nilotinib was supplied as 50 mg, 150 mg and 200 mg hard gelatin capsules and administered orally at 300 mg BID (twice a day) or 400 mg BID (twice a day)depending on the randomized dose.
Imatinib was supplied as 100 mg and 400 mg tablets and administered orally at 400 mg QD (once a day).
University of California at Los Angeles Dept. of Hematology Clinic
Los Angeles, California, United States
Kaiser Permanente - California Southern Dept of Kaiser South 3
San Diego, California, United States
Kaiser Permanente - California Northern Vallejo Med Center/Med Offices
Vallejo, California, United States
Kaiser Permanente - California Northern Kaiser Med
Vallejo, California, United States
Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers RMCC - Colorado Springs
Greenwood Village, Colorado, United States
Major Molecular Response Rate (MMR) at 12 Months Between All 3 Arms - With Imputation
MMR is defined as the percentage of participants in MMR (reduction of ≥ 3 logs in BCR-ABL transcripts compared to the standardized baseline established in IRIS, or ≤ 0.1% BCR-ABL/ABL % by international scale and measured by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR)) at 12 months.
Time frame: Baseline, 12 months
Percentage of Participants With MMR at 12 Months Between All 3 Arms by Sokal Risk Group With Imputation
MMR is defined as the percentage of participants in MMR (reduction of ≥ 3 logs in BCR-ABL transcripts compared to the standardized baseline established in IRIS, or ≤ 0.1% BCR-ABL/ABL % by international scale and measured by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR)) at 12 months.
Time frame: 12 months
Rates of Durable MMR at 24 Months Between All 3 Arms
Durable MMR at 24 months is defined as having MMR both at 12 months and at 24 months, and with no documented loss of MMR between these 12 month and 24 month time points.
Time frame: 24 months
Rate of Complete Cytogenetic Response (CCyR) in Nilotinib Treatment Arms With Imatinib at 12 Months and Beyond 12 Months
CCyR is defined as 0% Ph+ metaphases based on at least 20 metaphases from bone marrow cytogenetics. Patients with no CCyR as the best response by any specific time point, all missing cytogenetic evaluations by that time point or Ph- at baseline are combined as "Nocomplete cytogenetic response".
Time frame: 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72 months (M)
Rate of Major Molecular Response (MMR) at 12 Months Between Two Nilotinib Arms
MMR is defined as the percentage of participants in MMR (reduction of ≥ 3 logs in BCR-ABL transcripts compared to the standardized baseline established in IRIS, or ≤ 0.1% BCR-ABL/ABL % by international scale and measured by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR)) at 12 months based on 12-month cut-off interim data.
Time frame: 12 months
Rate of MMR at 6 Months and Beyond in All 3 Treatment Arms
MMR is defined as the percentage of participants in MMR (reduction of ≥ 3 logs in BCR-ABL transcripts compared to the standardized baseline established in IRIS, or ≤ 0.1% BCR-ABL/ABL % by international scale and measured by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR)) at 6 months and beyond up to 120 months based on final data.
Time frame: 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108 and 120 months
Rate of a ≥ 4 Log Reduction in BCR-ABL Transcripts in Nilotinib Treatment Arms With Imatinib
Molecular response of \<=0.01% is defined as BCR-ABL ratio (%) on IS \<= 0.01% (corresponds to \>=4 log reduction of BCR-ABL transcripts from standardized baseline value)
Time frame: at 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108 and 120 months
Rate of a ≥ 4.5 Log Reduction in BCR-ABL Transcripts in Nilotinib Treatment Arms With Imatinib
This is the molecular response of \<=0.0032% is defined as BCR-ABL ratio (%) on IS \<= 0.0032% (corresponds to \>=4.5 log reduction of BCR-ABL transcripts from standardized baseline value)
Time frame: at 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108 and 120 months
Time to First MMR
Time to MMR is defined as time from date of randomization to the date of the first documented MMR in nilotinib treatment arms, compared to imatinib in adult patients with Ph+ CML in CP.
Time frame: up to 84 months
Duration of MMR
Duration of MMR for patients with MMR is defined as the time between date of MMR and the earliest of the following: loss of MMR, CML-related death or progression to AP/BC during study treatment The time will be censored at last molecular assessment (PCR) date for patients for whom none of the above events is reported.
Time frame: approx. 11 years
Time to Both a ≥ 4 and ≥ 4.5 Log Reduction in BCR-ABL Transcripts
Time to BCR-ABL ratio of ≤ 0.01% and ≤ 0.0032% is defined as: date of first BCR-ABL ratio of ≤ 0.01% and ≤ 0.0032% - date of randomization +1.
Time frame: up to 84 months
Duration of Both a ≥ 4 and ≥ 4.5 Log Reduction in BCR-ABL Transcripts
It is defined as the time from the date of first documented BCR-ABL ratio of ≤ 0.01% and ≤ 0.0032% to the earliest of the following: Loss of BCR-ABL ratio of ≤ 0.01% and ≤ 0.0032%, respectively, CML-related death or progression to AP/BC during study treatment. The time will be censored at last molecular assessment (PCR) date for patients for whom none of the above events is reported.
Time frame: approx. 11 years
Rate of Hematologic Response
Rate of hematologic response is defined as the percentage of participants in complete hematologic response (defined as the following present for at least 4 weeks: WBC count \<10 x 109/L, Platelet count \<450 x 109/L, Basophils \<5%, No blasts and promyelocytes in peripheral blood, Myelocytes + metamyelocytes \< 5% in peripheral blood, No evidence of extramedullary disease, including spleen and liver).
Time frame: 12 months, 24 months, Overall on Core study (approx. 11 years)
Time to Complete Cytogenic Response (CCyR)
Time to CCyR is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of first documented CCyR
Time frame: 24 months
Duration of CCyR
Duration of CCyR is defined as the time from date of first documented CCyR to the earliest date of loss of CCyR.
Time frame: up to 72 months
Progression-free Survival (PFS)
Progression-free survival is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of event defined as the first documented disease progression to AP/BC or the date of death from any cause occurring in the core or extension study, or during the follow-up period after discontinuation of core or extension study
Time frame: approx. 11 years
Event-free Survival (EFS)
Event-free survival is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of first occurrence of any of the following: death due to any cause (if death is the primary reason for discontinuation), progression to AP or BC, loss of PCyR, loss of CCyR, loss of CHR
Time frame: approx. 11 years
Overall Survival (OS)
OS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date death. Up to 10 calendar years of follow up from the date when the last patient randomized received the first dose of study drug in all active treatment arms of adult patients with Ph+ CML CP.
Time frame: approx. 11 years
Actual Dose-intensity
Actual dose intensity is defined as total dose over time on treatment
Time frame: approx. 11 years
Time to Progression to AP/BC
Time to progression to AP/BC is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of event defined as the first documented disease progression to AP/BC or the date of CML related death.
Time frame: approx. 11 years
Pharmacokinetics: Cmax
Cmax is defined as the maximum serum concentration after dose
Time frame: any day after day 8 up to cycle 12 (each cycle = 28 days) and after at least 3 consecutive days without dose interruption or dose modification at pre-dose (0 hour), 1 hour, 2 hours, 3 hours, 5 hours, 8 hours, and 12 hours after dose administration
Pharmacokinetics: Cmin
Cmin is defined as the minimum serum concentration after dose
Time frame: any day after day 8 up to cycle 12 (each cycle = 28 days) and after at least 3 consecutive days without dose interruption or dose modification at pre-dose (0 hour), 1 hour, 2 hours, 3 hours, 5 hours, 8 hours, and 12 hours after dose administration
Pharmacokinetics: Tmax
Tmax is defined as the sampling time when maximum measured serum concentration occurs
Time frame: any day after day 8 up to cycle 12 (each cycle = 28 days) and after at least 3 consecutive days without dose interruption or dose modification at pre-dose (0 hour), 1 hour, 2 hours, 3 hours, 5 hours, 8 hours, and 12 hours after dose administration
Pharmacokinetics: AUC0-last
AUC0-last is defined as area under concentration-time curve from time zero to the last measurable sample, calculated by log-linear trapezoidal method
Time frame: any day after day 8 up to cycle 12 (each cycle = 28 days) and after at least 3 consecutive days without dose interruption or dose modification at pre-dose (0 hour), 1 hour, 2 hours, 3 hours, 5 hours, 8 hours, and 12 hours after dose administration
Rate of Hematologic Response on Nilotinib 400 mg BID Therapy After Insufficient Response During Core Treatment and Switch to Extension Phase (Extension)
Rate of hematologic response is defined as the percentage of participants in complete hematologic response (defined as the following present for at least 4 weeks: WBC count \<10 x 109/L, Platelet count \<450 x 109/L, Basophils \<5%, No blasts and promyelocytes in peripheral blood, Myelocytes + metamyelocytes \< 5% in peripheral blood, No evidence of extramedullary disease, including spleen and liver).
Time frame: Overall for Extension study for approx. 10 years
Rate of Complete Cytogenetic Response (CCyR) on Nilotinib 400 mg BID Therapy After Insufficient Response During Core Treatment and Switch to Extension Phase (Extension)
Rate of CCyR is defined as the percentage of participants in complete cytogenetic response (CCyR). CcyR is defined as 0% of Ph+ metaphases in the bone marrow.
Time frame: Overall for Extension study for approx. 10 years
Rate of Major Molecular Response (MMR) on Nilotinib 400 mg BID Therapy After Insufficient Response During Core Treatment and Switch to Extension Phase (Extension)
Rate of MMR is defined as the percentage pf participants in MMR (reduction of ≥ 3 logs in BCR-ABL transcripts compared to the standardized baseline established in IRIS, or ≤ 0.1% BCR-ABL/ABL % by international scale and measured by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR))
Time frame: Overall for Extension study for approx. 10 years
Rate of a ≥ 4 Log Reduction in BCR-ABL Transcripts on Nilotinib 400 mg BID Therapy After Insufficient Response During Core Treatment and Switch to Extension Phase (Extension)
Molecular response of \<=0.01% is defined as BCR-ABL ratio (%) on IS \<= 0.01% (corresponds to \>=4 log reduction of BCR-ABL transcripts from standardized baseline value)
Time frame: Overall for Extension study for approx. 10 years
Rate of ≥ 4.5 Log Reduction in BCR-ABL Transcripts on Nilotinib 400 mg BID Therapy After Insufficient Response During Core Treatment and Switch to Extension Phase (Extension)
Molecular response of \<=0.0032% is defined as BCR-ABL ratio (%) on IS \<= 0.0032% (corresponds to \>=4.5 log reduction of BCR-ABL transcripts from standardized baseline value)
Time frame: Overall for Extension study for approx. 10 years
Presence of Newly Observed BCR-ABL Mutations in Patients Post-baseline and Correlate With Response to Treatment With Imatinib and Nilotinib (Extension)
This is the percentage of patients with any emergent mutation on extension treatment. The mutation comprised of T315T, less sensitive to nilotinib, unknown and sensitive to nilotinib.
Time frame: Overall for Extension study for approx. 10 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Florida Cancer Specialists Dept. FloridaCancerSpecialists
Fort Myers, Florida, United States
Advanced Medical Specialties Research Dept.
Miami, Florida, United States
Cancer Centers of Florida PA Cancer Centers of FL
Ocoee, Florida, United States
Florida Retina Institute Flordia Cancer Affilates
Orlando, Florida, United States
University of Chicago Section of Hematology/Oncology
Chicago, Illinois, United States
...and 203 more locations