Study Objectives: 1. To document the safe and effective application of the F.T.M. Arm Training Program using the SaeboFlex to an inpatient post stroke rehabilitation population. 2. To compare functional improvements in hand and UE use achieved with the F.T.M. program as compared to generally applied therapeutic treatment approaches. 3. To develop recommendations for an inpatient retraining protocol that could then be evaluated in a multi-center trial. 4. To document the retention of UE and hand improvements after SaeboFlex training is discontinued as well as the carry over of these gains into daily function after therapy has been discontinued.
Therapeutic interventions for the recovery of hand function after a neurological injury have historically been very limited. A significant body of research now supports the use of an upper extremity retraining approach for functional recovery after neurological injury. Few therapeutic approaches offer any intervention specifically focused on grasp and release retraining. In an effort to address this deficit, the SaeboFlex dynamic hand orthosis was developed by occupational therapists. The F.T.M. Arm Training Program has been safely used by hundreds of occupational and physical therapists on over one thousand patients in outpatient neurological rehabilitation over the past two years. It is currently an accepted modality of treatment for the management of hand paresis in the acquired brain injury population. During that time, two factors, other than the severity of the initial injury, were identified as having a significant affect on the outcomes achieved in treatment. They are learned non-use and soft tissue shortening of the finger flexors. All treatment delivered to the subjects that partake in this study will be clinical care and the only research component of this study will be the assessment of outcomes. The purpose of this study is to explore the proper treatment dosage and treatment protocol for the application of the F.T.M. Program to the inpatient post stroke rehabilitation population. Additionally, information on functional outcome measures will be collected and compared to a matched control group that undergoes the standard therapeutic protocol.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
24
Kessler Institute for Rehabilitation
East Orange, New Jersey, United States
Hand grip strength (measured using dynamometry)
Time frame: At admission and at discharge
Length of Stay (days)
Time frame: The duration of the subject's inpatient hospital stay.
Stroke Impact Scale Score
Time frame: At admission and at discharge
Action Research Arm Test Score
Time frame: At admission and at discharge
Ashworth Assessment (Upper Extremity) Scores
Time frame: At admission and at discharge
Fugl-Meyer Assessment (Upper Extremity) Scores
Time frame: At admission and at discharge
Goniometric Range of Motion Evaluation, Passive and Active (Shoulder, Elbow, and Wrist)
Time frame: At admission and at discharge
Assessment of Active Range of Motion (Fingers, as ¼ range, ½ range, ¾ range or full range)
Time frame: At admission and at discharge
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.