RATIONALE: Sometimes prostate tumours may not need treatment until they progress. In this case, observation may be sufficient. Radical treatments, such as radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy, may be effective in treating prostate cancer when it is first diagnosed. It is not yet known whether active surveillance is more effective than radical treatment as an initial intervention in favorable prognosis prostate cancer. PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying active surveillance to see how well it works compared with radical treatment as an initial intervention in patients with favorable prognosis prostate cancer.
OBJECTIVES: Primary * To compare disease-specific survival of patients with favorable risk prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy or radical radiotherapy at the time of initial diagnosis vs active surveillance and selective intervention based on pre-specified biochemical, histological, or clinical progression criteria. Secondary * To compare overall survival, quality of life using the EPIC-26, RAND SF-12, and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, distant disease-free survival, PSA relapse/progression after radical intervention, and initiation of androgen deprivation therapy between the two treatment arms. * To determine the proportion of patients on the active surveillance arm who receive radical intervention for prostate cancer. * To determine if PSA doubling-time prior to diagnosis predicts eventual outcome. * To determine if molecular biomarkers predict outcome. OUTLINE: This is a prospective, randomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified by treatment center, ECOG performance status (0 vs 1 or 2), disease stage (T1 vs T2), baseline PSA value (ng/mL or μg/L) (\< 5.0 vs ≥ 5.0 and ≤ 10.0), and age (\< 65 years vs ≥ 65 years). Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms. * Arm I: Patients undergo radical intervention (radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy \[external-beam radiotherapy 5 days a week for 4-8 weeks; permanent prostate brachytherapy; or high-dose rate temporary brachytherapy\], based on patient and physician preference). * Arm II: Patients undergo active surveillance with radical intervention at the time one or more pre-specified criteria (biochemical progression, histologic/grade progression, and/or clinical progression) are met. Quality of life is assessed by the EPIC-26, RAND SF-12, and State Anxiety Inventory at baseline, periodically during study treatment, and after completion of radical treatment. After completion of radical treatment, patients are followed every 6 months.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
180
Radical prostatectomy
high dose rate temporary seed implant; permanent seed implant.
3D conformal radiation therapy; intensity modulated radiation therapy.
Periodic repeat biopsies
Clinical Research Unit at Vancouver Coastal
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
CancerCare Manitoba
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Dr. H. Bliss Murphy Cancer Centre
St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada
QEII Health Sciences Center
Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
London Regional Cancer Program
London, Ontario, Canada
Ottawa Health Research Institute - General Division
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Odette Cancer Centre
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Univ. Health Network-Princess Margaret Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
CHUM - Hopital Notre-Dame
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
McGill University - Dept. Oncology
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
...and 3 more locations
Disease-specific Survival
Time from the date of randomization to the date of death due to prostate cancer.
Time frame: 5 years 6 months
Overall Survival
Time from randomization to the date of death due to any causes.
Time frame: 5 years 6 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.