National multicentric prospective open study, comparing two current surgical methods: laparoscopic way versus open retropubic way among patients requiring a radical prostatectomy for a localised prostate cancer.
The aim of this study is to show that radical prostatectomy by laparoscopic way could obtain carcinological results not lower than theses with radical retropubic surgery.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
1,440
Radical retropubic prostatectomy
Radical laparoscopy prostatectomy
Groupe Hospitalier Albert Chenevier Henri Mondor
Créteil, France
RECRUITINGlaparoscopic way versus open retropubic way among patients requiring a radical prostatectomy for a localised prostate cancer.
Time frame: during the study
Carcinological (percentage of positive surgical margins, percentage of capsular crossing).
Time frame: after the surgical
Functional (urinary continence, sexuality, quality of life)
Time frame: at 2 years
per and post operational morbidity
Time frame: during the 36 months
economic
Time frame: duration and cost of hospitalization
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.