The primary objective of this study is to describe the safety and tolerability of 3 doses of MEDI-560 at 10\^5 TCID50 when administered to children 6 to \< 12 months of age who are HPIV3 (human parainfluenza virus type 3) seronegative at baseline and to infants 1 to \< 3 months of age regardless of baseline serostatus.
This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multidose Phase 1/2a multicenter study designed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, viral shedding, immunogenicity, and genotypic and phenotypic stability of MEDI-560 in infants 1 to \< 12 months of age. Three doses of MEDI-560 at a dosage level of 10\^5 TCID50 were administered 0, 2, and 4 months after enrollment to a 30-participant cohort of 6 to \< 12 month-old HPIV3 seronegative children randomized 2:1 to MEDI-560 vs placebo. A second 160-participant cohort of 1 to \< 3 month-old infants not screened for baseline serostatus was planned but was not opened to enrollment for reasons other than safety. Participants were followed for safety through 180 days post last dose. Nasal wash specimens were collected at screening and Days 7, 12, and 28 following each dose and during unscheduled illness visits to assess vaccine virus shedding and genotypic and phenotypic stability of any shed vaccine virus. Blood was collected at screening to determine eligibility and prior to Dose 1 for baseline serostatus. Blood for assessment of antibodies to HPIV3 was collected approximately 7 to 12 days after Dose 1 and Dose 3 and 1 month after each dose for antibodies to PIV3.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
30
MEDI-560 vaccine was a frozen preparation of live, attenuated rHPIV3cp45 virus filled into Becton Dickinson\^TM luer slip tip syringes. Each 0.2 mL dose contained 10\^5 TCID50 of MEDI-560 in a sucrose phosphate glutamate buffer.
Placebo was a frozen preparation filled into Becton Dickinson\^TM luer slip-tip syringes. Each 0.2 mL dose contained sucrose phosphate buffer.
Children's Investigational Research Program
Bentonville, Arkansas, United States
Number of Participants With Solicited Adverse Events (SEs) After Dose 1
Time frame: Days 0-28 after Dose 1 (Dose 1 was on Day 0)
Number of Participants With SEs After Dose 2
Time frame: Days 0-28 after Dose 2 (Dose 2 was on Day 48-64)
Number of Participants With SEs After Dose 3
Time frame: Days 0-28 after Dose 3 (Dose 3 was 48-64 days after Dose 2)
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) After Dose 1
Unsolicited AEs reported by 1 or more participants in either treatment group through 28 days post Dose 1.
Time frame: Days 0-28 after Dose 1 (Dose 1 was on Day 0)
Number of Participants With AEs After Dose 2
Unsolicited AEs reported by 1 or more participants in either treatment group through 28 days post Dose 2.
Time frame: Days 0-28 after Dose 2 (Dose 2 was on Day 48-64)
Number of Participants With AEs After Dose 3
Unsolicited AEs reported by 1 or more participants in either treatment group through 28 days post Dose 3.
Time frame: Days 0-28 after Dose 3 (Dose 3 was 48-64 days after Dose 2)
Number of Participants With Medically Attended Lower Respiratory Illnesses (MA-LRIs) After Dose 1
Time frame: Days 0-28 after Dose 1 (Dose 1 was on Day 0)
Number of Participants With MA-LRIs After Dose 2
Time frame: Days 0-28 after Dose 2 (Dose 2 was on Day 48-64)
Number of Participants With MA-LRIs After Dose 3
Time frame: Days 0-28 after Dose 3 (Dose 3 was 48-64 days after Dose 2)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Arkansas Pediatric Clinic
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
Madera Family Medical Group
Madera, California, United States
Allergy Medical Group of the North Area
Roseville, California, United States
Miami Children's Hospital
Miami, Florida, United States
Homestead Clinical Research
Naranja, Florida, United States
University of South Florida College of Medicine Department of Pediatrics
Tampa, Florida, United States
Kapiolani Medical Center for Women and Children
Honolulu, Hawaii, United States
Michael W. Simon, M.D.
Lexington, Kentucky, United States
Tulane University
New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
...and 13 more locations
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) After Dose 1
Time frame: Days 0-28 after Dose 1 (Dose 1 was on Day 0)
Number of Participants With SAEs After Dose 2
One participant had event of pneumonia after Dose 2.
Time frame: Days 0-28 after Dose 2 (Dose 2 was on Day 48-64)
Number of Participants With SAEs After Dose 3
Time frame: Days 0-28 after Dose 3 (Dose 3 was 48-64 days after Dose 2)
Number of Participants With Significant New Medical Conditions (SNMCs)
A SNMC is a newly diagnosed medical condition that is of a chronic, ongoing nature and is assessed by the investigator as medically significant.
Time frame: Day 0 through 180 days after final dose
Number of Participants Shedding Vaccine-like Virus at Any Time During Study Participation
Number of participants with nasal wash specimens that were culture positive for HPIV3 in which vaccine-like virus was identified.
Time frame: Days 7, 12, and 28 after each dose and during visits for pre-specified illness symptoms occurring Day 0 through 180 days post final dose.
Number of Participants Shedding Vaccine-like Virus at 7 Days After Dose 1
Number of participants with nasal wash specimens that were culture positive for HPIV3 in which vaccine-like virus was identified.
Time frame: Days 7-10 after Dose 1 (Dose 1 was on Day 0)
Number of Participants Shedding Vaccine-like Virus at 12 Days After Dose 1
Number of participants with nasal wash specimens that were culture positive for HPIV3 in which vaccine-like virus was identified.
Time frame: Days 12-18 after Dose 1 (Dose 1 was on Day 0)
Number of Participants Shedding Vaccine-like Virus at 28 Days After Dose 1
Number of participants with nasal wash specimens that were culture positive for HPIV3 in which vaccine-like virus was identified.
Time frame: Days 28-34 after Dose 1 (Dose 1 was on Day 0)
Number of Participants With Shedding of Vaccine-like Virus on Any Day During Days 0-28 After Dose 1
Time frame: Days 0-34 after Dose 1 (Dose 1 was on Day 0)
Number of Participants Shedding Vaccine-like Virus at 7 Days After Dose 2
Number of participants with nasal wash specimens that were culture positive for HPIV3 in which vaccine-like virus was identified.
Time frame: Days 7-10 after Dose 2 (Dose 2 was on Day 48-64)
Number of Participants Shedding Vaccine-like Virus at 12 Days After Dose 2
Number of participants with nasal wash specimens that were culture positive for HPIV3 in which vaccine-like virus was identified.
Time frame: Days 12-18 after Dose 2 (Dose 2 was on Day 48-64)
Number of Participants Shedding Vaccine-like Virus at 28 Days After Dose 2
Number of participants with nasal wash specimens that were culture positive for HPIV3 in which vaccine-like virus was identified.
Time frame: Days 28-34 after Dose 2 (Dose 2 was on Day 48-64)
Number of Participants With Shedding of Vaccine-like Virus on Any Day During Days 0-28 After Dose 2
Number of participants with nasal wash specimens that were culture positive for HPIV3 in which vaccine-like virus was identified.
Time frame: Days 0-34 after Dose 2 (Dose 2 was on Day 48-64)
Number of Participants Shedding Vaccine-like Virus at 7 Days After Dose 3
Number of participants with nasal wash specimens that were culture positive for HPIV3 in which vaccine-like virus was identified.
Time frame: Days 7-10 after Dose 3 (Dose 3 was 48-64 days after Dose 2)
Number of Participants Shedding Vaccine-like Virus at 12 Days After Dose 3
Number of participants with nasal wash specimens that were culture positive for HPIV3 in which vaccine-like virus was identified.
Time frame: Days 12-18 after Dose 3 (Dose 3 was 48-64 days after Dose 2)
Number of Participants Shedding Vaccine-like Virus at 28 Days After Dose 3
Number of participants with nasal wash specimens that were culture positive for HPIV3 in which vaccine-like virus was identified.
Time frame: Days 28-34 after Dose 3 (Dose 3 was 48-64 days after Dose 2)
Number of Participants With Shedding of Vaccine-like Virus on Any Day During Days 0-28 After Dose 3.
Number of participants with nasal wash specimens that were culture positive for HPIV3 in which vaccine-like virus was identified.
Time frame: Days 0-34 after Dose 3 (Dose 3 was 48-64 days after Dose 2)
Number of Participants With Hemagglutination Inhibition (HAI) Seroconversion/Seroresponse to HPIV3 28 Days After Dose 1
Hemagglutination inhibition seroconversion/seroresponse is equal to or greater than a 4-fold rise in HAI antibody titer from baseline. Hemagglutination inhibition antibody results obtained on or after detection of wild-type HPIV3 in culture were not considered valid.
Time frame: Days 28-34 after Dose 1 (Dose 1 was on Day 0)
Number of Participants With HAI Seroconversion/Seroresponse to HPIV3 28 Days After Dose 2
Hemagglutination inhibition seroconversion/seroresponse is equal to or greater than a 4-fold rise in HAI antibody titer from baseline. Hemagglutination inhibition antibody results obtained on or after detection of wild-type HPIV3 in culture were not considered valid.
Time frame: Days 28-34 after Dose 2 (Dose 2 was on Day 48-64)
Number of Participants With HAI Seroconversion/Seroresponse to HPIV3 28 Days After Dose 3
Hemagglutination inhibition seroconversion/seroresponse is equal to or greater than a 4-fold rise in HAI antibody titer from baseline. Hemagglutination inhibition antibody results obtained on or after detection of wild-type HPIV3 in culture were not considered valid.
Time frame: Days 28-34 after Dose 3 (Dose 3 was 48-64 days after Dose 2)
Number of Nasal Wash Samples Containing Vaccine-like Virus in the Absence of Admixture With Wild-type HPIV3 in Which the Vaccine-like Virus Was Genotypically Stable
A nasal wash specimen was collected at screening and on Days 7 (7-10), 12 (12-18), and 28 (28-34) post each dose and during visits for pre-specified illness symptoms occurring Day 0 through 180 days post final dose to assess vaccine virus replication. Genotypic stability of recovered vaccine-type virus at the 15 mutations of phenotypic importance was assessed.
Time frame: Day 0 after Dose 1 to 180 days after the final dose
Number of Nasal Wash Samples Containing Vaccine-like Virus in the Absence of Admixture With Wild-type HPIV3 in Which the Vaccine-like Virus Was Phenotypically Stable
A nasal wash specimen was collected at screening and on Days 7 (7-10), 12 (12-18), and 28 (28-34) post each dose and during visits for pre-specified illness symptoms occurring Day 0 through 180 days post final dose to assess vaccine virus replication. Determination of the temperature sensitivity of recovered vaccine-type virus.
Time frame: Day 0 after Dose 1 to 180 days after the final dose
Geometric Mean Titers (GMTs) of Serum HAI Antibodies to HPIV3 at Baseline
Pre-dose GMT of HAI antibody to HPIV3
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0 prior to Dose 1)
Geometric Mean Titers of Serum Antibodies to HPIV3 Day 28 Post Dose 1
Post-Dose 1 GMT of HAI antibody to HPIV3
Time frame: Day 28-34 after Dose 1 (Dose 1 was on Day 0)
Geometric Mean Titers of Serum Antibodies to HPIV3 Day 28 Post Dose 2
Post-Dose 2 GMT of HAI antibody to HPIV3
Time frame: Day 28-34 after Dose 2 (Dose 2 was on Day 48-64)
Geometric Mean Titers of Serum Antibodies to HPIV3 Day 28 Post Dose 3
Post-Dose 3 GMT of HAI antibody to HPIV3
Time frame: Day 28-34 after Dose 3 (Dose 3 was 48-64 days after Dose 2)