The objective of the study was to compare the efficacy and safety of 4 weeks treatment with bisacodyl (Dulcolax) tablets 10 mg to placebo in patients with functional constipation. In addition, the effect of treatment on quality of life and general health status was evaluated.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
368
2 x 5 mg bisacodyl once daily
Placebo-to-match bisacodyl 10 mg (2 x 5 mg) once daily
Mean Number of Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movements (CSBMs) Per Week Over the 4 Weeks Treatment Period
A Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (CSBM) is a complete non-rescue medication-induced stool. The number of CSBMs in each of the 4 weeks was divided by the number of days where data were available in this week, multiplied by 7 and rounded off to the next integer. The sum of the resulting numbers were divided by the number of weeks with data.
Time frame: 4 Weeks
Number of CSBMs at Week 1
The number of CSBMs at week 1 was divided by the number of days where data were available in this week, multiplied by 7 and rounded off to the next integer.
Time frame: Week 1 in treatment period
Number of CSBMs at Week 2
The number of CSBMs at week 2 was divided by the number of days where data were available in this week, multiplied by 7 and rounded off to the next integer.
Time frame: Week 2 in treatment period
Number of CSBMs at Week 3
The number of CSBMs at week 3 was divided by the number of days where data were available in this week, multiplied by 7 and rounded off to the next integer.
Time frame: Week 3 in treatment period
Number of CSBMs at Week 4
The number of CSBMs at week 4 was divided by the number of days where data were available in this week, multiplied by 7 and rounded off to the next integer.
Time frame: Week 4 in treatment period
Mean Number of SBMs Per Week Over the 4 Weeks Treatment Period
A Spontaneous Bowel Movement (SBM) is a non-rescue medication-induced stool. The number of SBMs in each of the 4 weeks was divided by the number of days where data were available in this week, multiplied by 7 and rounded off to the next integer. The sum of the resulting numbers were divided by the number of weeks with data.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
122.56.44032 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Addlestone, United Kingdom
122.56.44018 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Ash Vale, Aldershot, United Kingdom
122.56.44029 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Ashford, United Kingdom
122.56.44023 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Atherstone, United Kingdom
122.56.44011 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Bedworth, United Kingdom
122.56.44009 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Bennetthorpe, Doncaster, United Kingdom
122.56.44025 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Bexhill-on-Sea, United Kingdom
122.56.44012 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Blackpool, United Kingdom
122.56.44024 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Burbage, United Kingdom
122.56.44003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Cardiff, United Kingdom
...and 17 more locations
Time frame: 4 Weeks
Number of SBMs at Week 1
The number of SBMs at week 1 was divided by the number of days where data were available in this week, multiplied by 7 and rounded off to the next integer.
Time frame: Week 1 in treatment period
Number of SBMs at Week 2
The number of SBMs at week 2 was divided by the number of days where data were available in this week, multiplied by 7 and rounded off to the next integer.
Time frame: Week 2 in treatment period
Number of SBMs at Week 3
The number of SBMs at week 3 was divided by the number of days where data were available in this week, multiplied by 7 and rounded off to the next integer.
Time frame: Week 3 in treatment period
Number of SBMs at Week 4
The number of SBMs at week 4 was divided by the number of days where data were available in this week, multiplied by 7 and rounded off to the next integer.
Time frame: Week 4 in treatment period
Time to the First SBM Following the First Dose of Study Medication (SM)
The time to the first SBM following the first dose of SM was captured by the eDiary. The time was censored by the time of intake of rescue medication (RM), the time of premature discontinuation or the end of treatment whatever was minimal.
Time frame: Time of first dose of SM up to 4 weeks
Number of Participants With an Increase of at Least 1 in the Mean Number of CSBMs Per Week Over the 4 Weeks Treatment Period Compared to Baseline
Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks
Number of Participants With an Increase of at Least 1 CSBM at Week 1 Compared to Baseline
Time frame: Baseline and week 1 in treatment period
Number of Participants With an Increase of at Least 1 CSBM at Week 2 Compared to Baseline
Time frame: Baseline and week 2 in treatment period
Number of Participants With an Increase of at Least 1 CSBM at Week 3 Compared to Baseline
Time frame: Baseline and week 3 in treatment period
Number of Participants With an Increase of at Least 1 CSBM at Week 4 Compared to Baseline
Time frame: Baseline and week 4 in treatment period
Number of Participants With a Mean of at Least 1 CSBM a Day Over the 4 Weeks Treatment Period
Time frame: 4 weeks
Number of Participants With a Mean of at Least 3 CSBMs a Week Over the 4 Weeks Treatment Period
Time frame: 4 weeks
Number of Premature Withdrawals Over the 4 Weeks Treatment Period
Time frame: 4 weeks
Number of Premature Withdrawals at Week 1 in the Treatment Period
Time frame: Week 1 in the treatment period
Number of Premature Withdrawals at Week 2 in the Treatment Period
Time frame: Week 2 in the treatment period
Number of Premature Withdrawals at Week 3 in the Treatment Period
Time frame: Week 3 in the treatment period
Number of Premature Withdrawals at Week 4 in the Treatment Period
Time frame: Week 4 in the treatment period
Number of Participants Using Rescue Medication Over the 4 Weeks Treatment Period
Time frame: 4 weeks
Number of Participants Using Rescue Medication at Week 1 in the Treatment Period
Time frame: Week 1 in the treatment period
Number of Participants Using Rescue Medication at Week 2 in the Treatment Period
Time frame: Week 2 in the treatment period
Number of Participants Using Rescue Medication at Week 3 in the Treatment Period
Time frame: Week 3 in the treatment period
Number of Participants Using Rescue Medication at Week 4 in the Treatment Period
Time frame: Week 4 in the treatment period
Change From Baseline in the Mean Score for Constipation Symptom 'Straining' at Week 1
The score on a 5-point ordinal verbal rating scale from 0 (absent) to 4 (very severe) specifying patient's symptom assessment associated with each bowel movement was averaged over the day and then averaged over the days in the corresponding week.
Time frame: Baseline and week 1 in treatment period
Change From Baseline in the Mean Score for Constipation Symptom 'Straining' at Week 2
The score on a 5-point ordinal verbal rating scale from 0 (absent) to 4 (very severe) specifying patient's symptom assessment associated with each bowel movement was averaged over the day and then averaged over the days in the corresponding week.
Time frame: Baseline and week 2 in treatment period
Change From Baseline in the Mean Score for Constipation Symptom 'Straining' at Week 3
The score on a 5-point ordinal verbal rating scale from 0 (absent) to 4 (very severe) specifying patient's symptom assessment associated with each bowel movement was averaged over the day and then averaged over the days in the corresponding week.
Time frame: Baseline and week 3 in treatment period
Change From Baseline in the Mean Score for Constipation Symptom 'Straining' at Week 4
The score on a 5-point ordinal verbal rating scale from 0 (absent) to 4 (very severe) specifying patient's symptom assessment associated with each bowel movement was averaged over the day and then averaged over the days in the corresponding week.
Time frame: Baseline and week 4 in treatment period
Change From Baseline in the Mean Score for Constipation Symptom 'Stool Quality' at Week 1
The score on the 7-point Bristol Stool Form Scale from Type 1 (hard, lumpy stool) to Type 7 (watery stool) specifying patient's symptom assessment associated with each bowel movement was averaged over the day and then averaged over the days in the corresponding week.
Time frame: Baseline and week 1 in treatment period
Change From Baseline in the Mean Score for Constipation Symptom 'Stool Quality' at Week 2
The score on the 7-point Bristol Stool Form Scale from Type 1 (hard, lumpy stool) to Type 7 (watery stool) specifying patient's symptom assessment associated with each bowel movement was averaged over the day and then averaged over the days in the corresponding week.
Time frame: Baseline and week 2 in treatment period
Change From Baseline in the Mean Score for Constipation Symptom 'Stool Quality' at Week 3
The score on the 7-point Bristol Stool Form Scale from Type 1 (hard, lumpy stool) to Type 7 (watery stool) specifying patient's symptom assessment associated with each bowel movement was averaged over the day and then averaged over the days in the corresponding week.
Time frame: Baseline and week 3 in treatment period
Change From Baseline in the Mean Score for Constipation Symptom 'Stool Quality' at Week 4
The score on the 7-point Bristol Stool Form Scale from Type 1 (hard, lumpy stool) to Type 7 (watery stool) specifying patient's symptom assessment associated with each bowel movement was averaged over the day and then averaged over the days in the corresponding week.
Time frame: Baseline and week 4 in treatment period
Change From Baseline in the Mean Score for Constipation Symptom 'Sensation of Incomplete Evacuation' at Week 1
The score on a 2-point ordinal verbal rating scale from 0 (no) to 1 (yes) specifying patient's symptom assessment associated with each bowel movement was averaged over the day and then averaged over the days in the corresponding week.
Time frame: Baseline and week 1 in treatment period
Change From Baseline in the Mean Score for Constipation Symptom 'Sensation of Incomplete Evacuation' at Week 2
The score on a 2-point ordinal verbal rating scale from 0 (no) to 1 (yes) specifying patient's symptom assessment associated with each bowel movement was averaged over the day and then averaged over the days in the corresponding week.
Time frame: Baseline and week 2 in treatment period
Change From Baseline in the Mean Score for Constipation Symptom 'Sensation of Incomplete Evacuation' at Week 3
The score on a 2-point ordinal verbal rating scale from 0 (no) to 1 (yes) specifying patient's symptom assessment associated with each bowel movement was averaged over the day and then averaged over the days in the corresponding week.
Time frame: Baseline and week 3 in treatment period
Change From Baseline in the Mean Score for Constipation Symptom 'Sensation of Incomplete Evacuation' at Week 4
The score on a 2-point ordinal verbal rating scale from 0 (no) to 1 (yes) specifying patient's symptom assessment associated with each bowel movement was averaged over the day and then averaged over the days in the corresponding week.
Time frame: Baseline and week 4 in treatment period
Change From Baseline in the Mean Score for Constipation Symptom 'Anorectal Obstructions/Blockade' at Week 1
The score on a 5-point ordinal verbal rating scale from 0 (absent) to 4 (very severe) specifying patient's symptom assessment associated with each bowel movement was averaged over the day and then averaged over the days in the corresponding week.
Time frame: Baseline and week 1 in treatment period
Change From Baseline in the Mean Score for Constipation Symptom 'Anorectal Obstructions/Blockade' at Week 2
The score on a 5-point ordinal verbal rating scale from 0 (absent) to 4 (very severe) specifying patient's symptom assessment associated with each bowel movement was averaged over the day and then averaged over the days in the corresponding week.
Time frame: Baseline and week 2 in treatment period
Change From Baseline in the Mean Score for Constipation Symptom 'Anorectal Obstructions/Blockade' at Week 3
The score on a 5-point ordinal verbal rating scale from 0 (absent) to 4 (very severe) specifying patient's symptom assessment associated with each bowel movement was averaged over the day and then averaged over the days in the corresponding week.
Time frame: Baseline and week 3 in treatment period
Change From Baseline in the Mean Score for Constipation Symptom 'Anorectal Obstructions/Blockade' at Week 4
The score on a 5-point ordinal verbal rating scale from 0 (absent) to 4 (very severe) specifying patient's symptom assessment associated with each bowel movement was averaged over the day and then averaged over the days in the corresponding week.
Time frame: Baseline and week 4 in treatment period
Change From Baseline in the Mean Score for Constipation Symptom 'Manual Manoeuvre' at Week 1
The score on a 2-point ordinal verbal rating scale from 0 (no) to 1 (yes) specifying patient's symptom assessment associated with each bowel movement was averaged over the day and then averaged over the days in the corresponding week.
Time frame: Baseline and week 1 in treatment period
Change From Baseline in the Mean Score for Constipation Symptom 'Manual Manoeuvre' at Week 2
The score on a 2-point ordinal verbal rating scale from 0 (no) to 1 (yes) specifying patient's symptom assessment associated with each bowel movement was averaged over the day and then averaged over the days in the corresponding week.
Time frame: Baseline and week 2 in treatment period
Change From Baseline in the Mean Score for Constipation Symptom 'Manual Manoeuvre' at Week 3
The score on a 2-point ordinal verbal rating scale from 0 (no) to 1 (yes) specifying patient's symptom assessment associated with each bowel movement was averaged over the day and then averaged over the days in the corresponding week.
Time frame: Baseline and week 3 in treatment period
Change From Baseline in the Mean Score for Constipation Symptom 'Manual Manoeuvre' at Week 4
The score on a 2-point ordinal verbal rating scale from 0 (no) to 1 (yes) specifying patient's symptom assessment associated with each bowel movement was averaged over the day and then averaged over the days in the corresponding week.
Time frame: Baseline and week 4 in treatment period
Number of Participants With Improved, Unchanged or Worsened Overall Satisfaction With Bowel Habits at Week 1 in the Treatment Period in Comparison to Baseline
Improved / unchanged / worsened overall satisfaction is a decreased / unchanged / increased score on a 5-point ordinal VRS: 0 (A very great deal satisfied) to 4 (Not at all satisfied) at the corresponding week in comparison to baseline
Time frame: Baseline and week 1 in the treatment period
Number of Participants With Improved, Unchanged or Worsened Overall Satisfaction With Bowel Habits at Week 2 in the Treatment Period in Comparison to Baseline
Improved / unchanged / worsened overall satisfaction is a decreased / unchanged / increased score on a 5-point ordinal VRS: 0 (A very great deal satisfied) to 4 (Not at all satisfied) at the corresponding week in comparison to baseline
Time frame: Baseline and week 2 in the treatment period
Number of Participants With Improved, Unchanged or Worsened Overall Satisfaction With Bowel Habits at Week 3 in the Treatment Period in Comparison to Baseline
Improved / unchanged / worsened overall satisfaction is a decreased / unchanged / increased score on a 5-point ordinal VRS: 0 (A very great deal satisfied) to 4 (Not at all satisfied) at the corresponding week in comparison to baseline
Time frame: Baseline and week 3 in the treatment period
Number of Participants With Improved, Unchanged or Worsened Overall Satisfaction With Bowel Habits at Week 4 in the Treatment Period in Comparison to Baseline
Improved / unchanged / worsened overall satisfaction is a decreased / unchanged / increased score on a 5-point ordinal VRS: 0 (A very great deal satisfied) to 4 (Not at all satisfied) at the corresponding week in comparison to baseline
Time frame: Baseline and week 4 in the treatment period
Number of Participants With Reduced, Unchanged or Increased Bothersomeness With Constipation at Week 1 in the Treatment Period in Comparison to Baseline
Reduced / unchanged / increased bothersomeness of constipation is a decreased / unchanged / increased score on a 5-point ordinal VRS: 0 (Not at all bothersome) to 4 (A very great deal bothersome) at the corresponding week in comparison to baseline
Time frame: Baseline and week 1 in the treatment period
Number of Participants With Reduced, Unchanged or Increased Bothersomeness With Constipation at Week 2 in the Treatment Period in Comparison to Baseline
Reduced / unchanged / increased bothersomeness of constipation is a decreased / unchanged / increased score on a 5-point ordinal VRS: 0 (Not at all bothersome) to 4 (A very great deal bothersome) at the corresponding week in comparison to baseline
Time frame: Baseline and week 2 in the treatment period
Number of Participants With Reduced, Unchanged or Increased Bothersomeness With Constipation at Week 3 in the Treatment Period in Comparison to Baseline
Reduced / unchanged / increased bothersomeness of constipation is a decreased / unchanged / increased score on a 5-point ordinal VRS: 0 (Not at all bothersome) to 4 (A very great deal bothersome) at the corresponding week in comparison to baseline
Time frame: Baseline and week 3 in the treatment period
Number of Participants With Reduced, Unchanged or Increased Bothersomeness With Constipation at Week 4 in the Treatment Period in Comparison to Baseline
Reduced / unchanged / increased bothersomeness of constipation is a decreased / unchanged / increased score on a 5-point ordinal VRS: 0 (Not at all bothersome) to 4 (A very great deal bothersome) at the corresponding week in comparison to baseline
Time frame: Baseline and week 4 in the treatment period
Number of Participants With Reduced, Unchanged or Increased Bothersomeness With Abdominal Bloating at Week 1 in the Treatment Period in Comparison to Baseline
Reduced / unchanged / increased bothersomeness of abdominal bloating is a decreased / unchanged / increased score on a 5-point ordinal VRS: 0 (Not at all bothersome) to 4 (A very great deal bothersome) at the corresponding week in comparison to baseline
Time frame: Baseline and week 1 in the treatment period
Number of Participants With Reduced, Unchanged or Increased Bothersomeness With Abdominal Bloating at Week 2 in the Treatment Period in Comparison to Baseline
Reduced / unchanged / increased bothersomeness of abdominal bloating is a decreased / unchanged / increased score on a 5-point ordinal VRS: 0 (Not at all bothersome) to 4 (A very great deal bothersome) at the corresponding week in comparison to baseline
Time frame: Baseline and week 2 in the treatment period
Number of Participants With Reduced, Unchanged or Increased Bothersomeness With Abdominal Bloating at Week 3 in the Treatment Period in Comparison to Baseline
Reduced / unchanged / increased bothersomeness of abdominal bloating is a decreased / unchanged / increased score on a 5-point ordinal VRS: 0 (Not at all bothersome) to 4 (A very great deal bothersome) at the corresponding week in comparison to baseline
Time frame: Baseline and week 3 in the treatment period
Number of Participants With Reduced, Unchanged or Increased Bothersomeness With Abdominal Bloating at Week 4 in the Treatment Period in Comparison to Baseline
Reduced / unchanged / increased bothersomeness of abdominal bloating is a decreased / unchanged / increased score on a 5-point ordinal VRS: 0 (Not at all bothersome) to 4 (A very great deal bothersome) at the corresponding week in comparison to baseline
Time frame: Baseline and week 4 in the treatment period
Number of Participants With Reduced, Unchanged or Increased Bothersomeness With Abdominal Discomfort at Week 1 in the Treatment Period in Comparison to Baseline
Reduced / unchanged / increased bothersomeness of abdominal discomfort is a decreased / unchanged / increased score on a 5-point ordinal VRS: 0 (Not at all bothersome) to 4 (A very great deal bothersome) at the corresponding week in comparison to baseline
Time frame: Baseline and week 1 in the treatment period
Number of Participants With Reduced, Unchanged or Increased Bothersomeness With Abdominal Discomfort at Week 2 in the Treatment Period in Comparison to Baseline
Reduced / unchanged / increased bothersomeness of abdominal discomfort is a decreased / unchanged / increased score on a 5-point ordinal VRS: 0 (Not at all bothersome) to 4 (A very great deal bothersome) at the corresponding week in comparison to baseline
Time frame: Baseline and week 2 in the treatment period
Number of Participants With Reduced, Unchanged or Increased Bothersomeness With Abdominal Discomfort at Week 3 in the Treatment Period in Comparison to Baseline
Reduced / unchanged / increased bothersomeness of abdominal discomfort is a decreased / unchanged / increased score on a 5-point ordinal VRS: 0 (Not at all bothersome) to 4 (A very great deal bothersome) at the corresponding week in comparison to baseline
Time frame: Baseline and week 3 in the treatment period
Number of Participants With Reduced, Unchanged or Increased Bothersomeness With Abdominal Discomfort at Week 4 in the Treatment Period in Comparison to Baseline
Reduced / unchanged / increased bothersomeness of abdominal discomfort is a decreased / unchanged / increased score on a 5-point ordinal VRS: 0 (Not at all bothersome) to 4 (A very great deal bothersome) at the corresponding week in comparison to baseline
Time frame: Baseline and week 4 in the treatment period
Number of Participants With Respect to the Final Global Assessment of Efficacy by the Investigator
Final global assessment scale range: 1 (good) to 4 (bad), ordinal
Time frame: 4 weeks
Number of Participants With Respect to the Final Global Assessment of Efficacy by the Patient
Final global assessment scale range: 1 (good) to 4 (bad), ordinal
Time frame: 4 weeks
Number of Participants With Respect to the Final Global Assessment of Tolerability by the Investigator
Final global assessment scale range: 1 (good) to 4 (bad), ordinal
Time frame: 4 weeks
Number of Participants With Respect to the Final Global Assessment of Tolerability by the Patient
Final global assessment scale range: 1 (good) to 4 (bad), ordinal
Time frame: 4 weeks
Change From Baseline in the SF-36 Dimension 'Physical Functioning'
The dimension is a sum of 10 single items and then transferred to a scale ranging from 0 to 100. Single item scores are inverted, if applicable, to ensure that a higher score indicates a better health.
Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks
Change From Baseline in the SF-36 Dimension 'Role Limitation Due to Physical Problems'
The dimension is a sum of 4 single items and then transferred to a scale ranging from 0 to 100. Single item scores are inverted, if applicable, to ensure that a higher score indicates a better health.
Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks
Change From Baseline in the SF-36 Dimension 'Bodily Pain'
The dimension is a sum of 2 single items and then transferred to a scale ranging from 0 to 100. Single item scores are inverted, if applicable, to ensure that a higher score indicates a better health.
Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks
Change From Baseline in the SF-36 Dimension 'General Health'
The dimension is a sum of 5 single items and then transferred to a scale ranging from 0 to 100. Single item scores are inverted, if applicable, to ensure that a higher score indicates a better health.
Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks
Change From Baseline in the SF-36 Dimension 'Vitality'
The dimension is a sum of 4 single items and then transferred to a scale ranging from 0 to 100. Single item scores are inverted, if applicable, to ensure that a higher score indicates a better health.
Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks
Change From Baseline in the SF-36 Dimension 'Social Functioning'
The dimension is a sum of 2 single items and then transferred to a scale ranging from 0 to 100. Single item scores are inverted, if applicable, to ensure that a higher score indicates a better health.
Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks
Change From Baseline in the SF-36 Dimension 'Role Limitation Due to Emotional Problems'
The dimension is a sum of 3 single items and then transferred to a scale ranging from 0 to 100. Single item scores are inverted, if applicable, to ensure that a higher score indicates a better health.
Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks
Change From Baseline in the SF-36 Dimension 'Mental Health'
The dimension is a sum of 5 single items and then transferred to a scale ranging from 0 to 100. Single item scores are inverted, if applicable, to ensure that a higher score indicates a better health.
Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks
Change From Baseline in the SF-36 Mental Component Scale (MCS)
The MCS is a summary scale of the dimensions vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. The component scale is norm-based to a standard population. A higher score indicates a better health.
Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks
Change From Baseline in the SF-36 Physical Component Scale (PCS)
The PCS is a summary scale of the subscales physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, and general health. The component scale is norm-based to a standard population. A higher score indicates a better health.
Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks
Change From Baseline in the PAC-QoL Subscale 'Worries and Concerns'
The PAC-QoL is a 28-item (5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (none of the time or not at all) to 4 (all of the time or extremely). Single item scores are inverted, if applicable, to ensure that a lower score indicates a better QoL
Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks
Change From Baseline in the PAC-QoL Subscale 'Physical Discomfort'
The PAC-QoL is a 28-item (5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (none of the time or not at all) to 4 (all of the time or extremely). Single item scores are inverted, if applicable, to ensure that a lower score indicates a better QoL
Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks
Change From Baseline in the PAC-QoL Subscale 'Psychosocial Discomfort'
The PAC-QoL is a 28-item (5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (none of the time or not at all) to 4 (all of the time or extremely). Single item scores are inverted, if applicable, to ensure that a lower score indicates a better QoL
Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks
Change From Baseline in the PAC-QoL Subscale 'Satisfaction'
The PAC-QoL is a 28-item (5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (none of the time or not at all) to 4 (all of the time or extremely). Single item scores are inverted, if applicable, to ensure that a lower score indicates a better QoL
Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks
Change From Baseline in the PAC-QoL Overall Score
The PAC-QoL is a 28-item (5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (none of the time or not at all) to 4 (all of the time or extremely). Single item scores are inverted, if applicable, to ensure that a lower score indicates a better QoL
Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks
Change From Baseline for Sodium (Normalized Value)
Normalized value: the reported laboratory value is converted by linear transformation to a preferred unit and then linear-transformed with respect to the standard reference range
Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks
Change From Baseline for Potassium (Normalized Value)
Normalized value: the reported laboratory value is converted by linear transformation to a preferred unit and then linear-transformed with respect to the standard reference range
Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks
Change From Baseline for Chloride (Normalized Value)
Normalized value: the reported laboratory value is converted by linear transformation to a preferred unit and then linear-transformed with respect to the standard reference range
Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks