The purpose of this study is to determine an optimal abatacept dosing regimen for the treatment of active arthritis due to psoriatic arthritis in patients who have had a prior inadequate response to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, including methotrexate and tumor necrosis factor alpha-blockade compounds.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
191
Long-term Period: Number of Participants With Death As Outcome, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Drug-related SAEs, SAEs Leading to Discontinuation, Adverse Events (AEs), Drug-related AEs, AEs Leading to Discontinuation, and AEs of Interest
Presp=prespecified; acute= ≤1 hour after start of infusion; periinfusional= ≤24 hours after start of infusion. AE=any new unfavorable symptom or disease or worsening of a preexisting condition that may not have a causal relationship with treatment. SAE=an unfavorable medical event that at any dose results in death, significant disability, drug dependency/abuse, hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization; is life-threatening, an important medical event, or a congenital anomaly/birth defect. Drug-related=possibly, probably, or certainly related and of unknown relationship to study drug.
Time frame: From Day 169 to Day 729
Short-term Period: Number of Participants With ACR 20 Response at Day 169
An ACR 20 responder was a participant who had a reduction of 20% or more from baseline in scores for both tender and swollen joints and had a reduction from baseline of 20% or more in 3 out of the following 5 assessments: participant's assessment of disease activity, participant's global assessment of disease activity, investigator's global assessment of disease activity, participant's assessment of physical function by HAQ-DI, and Disease Activity Score 28-C reactive protein.
Time frame: At Day 169 from Baseline
Long-term Period: Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20, ACR 50, ACR 70, ACR 90 Responses at Days 365 and 729
An ACR 20 (50, 70, 90) responder was a participant whose counts for both tender and swollen joints was reduced by 20% (50%, 70%, 90%, respectively) or more from baseline and who had a reduction of 20% (50%, 70%, 90%, respectively) or more from baseline in 3 of the following assessments: participant's assessment of disease activity, participant's global assessment of disease activity, Investigators Global Response, participant's assessment of physical function by Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index, and Disease Activity Score 28 based on C-reactive protein.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Rheumatology Associates Of North Alabama
Huntsville, Alabama, United States
Desert Medical Advances
Palm Desert, California, United States
Stanford University School Of Medicine
Palo Alto, California, United States
Boling Clinical Trials
Upland, California, United States
Joao Nascimento
Bridgeport, Connecticut, United States
New England Research Associates, Llc
Trumbull, Connecticut, United States
Sarasota Arthritis Research Center
Sarasota, Florida, United States
Clinical Pharmacology Study Group
Worcester, Massachusetts, United States
Justus Fiechtner, Md, Mph
Lansing, Michigan, United States
St. Paul Rheumatology P.A.
Eagan, Minnesota, United States
...and 34 more locations
Time frame: At Days 365 and 729 from Baseline
Long-term Period: Number of Participants With an Investigators Global Assessment (IGA) Score of Clear or Almost Clear at Days 365 and 729
IGA score indicates lesion induration, scaling, and erythema: 0=clear (no signs of plaque psoriasis except for residual discoloration); 1=almost clear (just perceptible erythema, no induration to very slightly elevated above normal skin levels, limited amount of very fine scaling); 2=mild disease (mild erythema, mild induration, mainly fine scaling predominates); 3=moderate disease (moderate erythema \[most plaques are red\], moderate induration and/or coarse scale predominates); 4=severe (severe erythema, marked to very marked elevation of lesions, coarse thick scale predominates).
Time frame: From Day 169 to Days 365 and 729
Long-term Period: Mean Percentage of Change From Baseline in Target Lesion Score at Days 365 and 729
Target lesion score is a measurement of the degree of erythema, induration, and scale of a psoriatic lesion, at least 2 cm in diameter, selected as a target for response throughout the study period. The scores assigned were 0=clear, 1=almost clear, 2=mild clear, 3=moderate disease, 4=severe. Percent improvement from baseline was computed using the ratio of improvement from baseline to the baseline value.
Time frame: From Baseline to Days 365 and 729
Long-term Period: Mean Change From Baseline in the Short-form 36 (SF-36), Version 2, Domain and Component Scores at Days 365 and 729
PCS=physical component score; MCS=mental component score. The SF-36 is a 36-item instrument with physical and mental components and covers quality of life (QoL) domains: vitality, physical functioning, bodily pain, general health perceptions, physical role functioning, emotional role functioning, social role functioning, and mental health. Responses are used to derive physical and mental component summary scores, ranging from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better QoL. Mean change from baseline=postbaseline value-baseline value; a higher value signifies improvement.
Time frame: At Days 365 and 729 from baseline
Long-term Period: Number of Participants Achieving A Reduction of At Least 0.3 Unit From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Days 365 and 729
Per the HAQ-DI, participants assessed their own ability to perform the following tasks: dress/groom, arise, eat, walk, reach, grip, maintain hygiene, and maintain daily activity over a period by marking their responses on a questionnaire. Scoring of the HAQ-DI: 0=without any difficulty; 1=with some difficulty; 2=with much difficulty); and 3=unable to do. Greater score=greater disability. Responders with a \>= 0.3 unit decrease in index scores from baseline to days 365 and 729 were considered to be improved.
Time frame: Days 365 and 729 from baseline
Short-term Period: Number of Participants With Marked Abnormalities in Hematology
LLN=lower limit of normal; ULN=upper limit of normal; pre-Rx=pretreatment. Marked abnormalities are laboratory measurements marked as abnormal, per predefined study criteria, at any study time point. Criteria: Hemoglobin \>3 g/dL decrease from pre-Rx value; hematocrit \<0.75\*pre-Rx value; erythrocytes \<0.75\*pre-Rx value; platelets \<0.67\*LLN (or, if pre-Rx value \<LLN, \<0.5\*pre-Rx value and \<100000/mm\^3) or \>1.5\*ULN.
Time frame: From Baseline to Day 169
Short-term Period: Number of Participants With Marked Abnormalities in Hematology (Continued)
LLN=lower limit of normal; ULN=upper limit of normal; pre-Rx=pretreatment. Laboratory measurements are marked as abnormal per predefined study criteria, at any study time point. Criteria for the data presented. Leukocytes \<0.75\*LLN or \>1.25\*ULN (or, if pre-Rx value \<LLN, \<0.8\*pre-Rx or \>ULN. If pre-Rx value \>ULN, \>1.2\*pre-Rx or \<LLN); neutrophils+bands (absolute) \<1.00\*10\^3 c/uL; lymphocytes (absolute) \<0.75\*10\^3 c/uL or \>7.50\*10\^3 c/uL; monocytes (absolute) \>2000/mm\^3; basophils (absolute) \>0.40\*10\^3 c/uL; eosinophils (absolute) \>0.75\*10\^3 c/uL.
Time frame: From Baseline to Day 169
Short-term Period: Number of Participants With Marked Abnormalities in Serum Chemistry
ULN=upper limit of normal; pre-Rx=pretreatment. Marked abnormality criteria: Alkaline phosphatase (ALP), gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) \>2\*ULN (if pre-Rx \>ULN, \>3\*pre-Rx); aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine transaminase (ALT) \>3\*ULN (if pre-Rx \>ULN, \>4\*pre-Rx); bilirubin (total) \>2\*ULN (if pre-Rx \>ULN, \>4\*pre-Rx); blood urea nitrogen (BUN) \>2\*pre-Rx; creatinine \>1.5\*pre-Rx.
Time frame: Baseline to Day 169
Short-term Period: Number of Participants With Marked Abnormalities in Serum Chemistry (Continued)
LLN=lower limit of normal; ULN=upper limit of normal; pre-Rx=pretreatment. Marked abnormality criteria: Sodium \<0.95\*LLN or \>1.05\*ULN (if pre-Rx\<LLN, \<0.95\*pre-Rx or \>ULN. If pre-Rx \>ULN,\>1.05\* pre-Rx or \<LLN); potassium, chloride \<0.9\*LLN or \>1.1\*ULN (if pre-Rx \<LLN, \<0.9\*pre-Rx or \>ULN. If pre-Rx \>ULN, \>1.1\*pre-Rx or \<LLN); calcium \<0.8\*LLN or \>1.2\*ULN (if pre-Rx \<LLN,\<0.75\* pre-Rx or \>ULN. If pre-Rx \>ULN, \>1.25\* pre-Rx or \<LLN); phosphorous \<0.75\*LLN or \>1.25\*ULN (if pre-Rx \<LLN, \<0.67\*pre-Rx or \>ULN. If pre-Rx \>ULN, \>1.33\*pre-Rx or \<LLN.
Time frame: Baseline to Day 169
Short-term Period: Number of Participants With Marked Abnormalities in Serum Chemistry (Continued)
LLN=lower limit of normal; ULN=upper limit of normal; pre-Rx=pretreatment. Marked abnormality criteria: Glucose \<65 or \>220 mg/dL; glucose (fasting)\<0.8\*LLN or \>1.5\*ULN (if pre-Rx \<LLN, \<0.8\*pre-Rx or \>ULN. If pre-Rx \>ULN, t\>2.0\*pre-Rx or \<LLN). Protein (total) \<0.9\*LLN or \>1.1\*ULN (if pre-Rx \<LLN, \<0.9\*pre-Rx or \>ULN. If pre-Rx \>ULN, \>1.1\*pre-Rx or \<LLN). Albumin \<0.9\*LLN (if pre-Rx \<LLN, \<0.75\* pre-Rx). Uric acid \>1.5\*ULN; if pre-Rx \>ULN or \>2\*pre-Rx value.
Time frame: From Baseline to Day 169
Short-term Period: Number of Participants With Marked Abnormalities in Urinalysis
Pre-Rx=pretreatment. Criteria for marked abnormality: Protein, glucose, blood, leukocyte esterase, red blood cells (RBC), white blood cells (WBC) \>=2+ (or, if value \>=4, or if pre-Rx value=0 or 0.5, \>= 2\* or if pre-RX value =1, \>=3, or if pre-Rx =2 or 3, \>=4).
Time frame: From Baseline to Day 169
Short-term Period: Number of Participants Who Died and With SAEs, AEs, AEs Leading to Discontinuation, SAEs Leading to Discontinuation, Drug-related AEs, and Drug-related SAEs
An AE is any new unfavorable symptom, sign, or disease or worsening of a preexisting condition that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with treatment. An SAE is any unfavorable medical event that at any dose results in death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or drug dependency or abuse; is life-threatening, an important medical event, or a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or requires or prolongs hospitalization. Drug-related=possibly, probably, or certainly related to and of unknown relationship to study treatment.
Time frame: From Baseline to Day 169
Short-term Period: Number of Participants With an IGA Score of Clear or Almost Clear at Day 169
Score indicates lesion induration, scaling, and erythema: 0 = clear (no signs of plaque psoriasis except for residual discoloration); 1 = almost clear (just perceptible erythema, no induration to very slightly elevated above normal skin levels, limited amount of very fine scaling); 2 = mild disease (mild erythema, mild induration, mainly fine scaling predominates); 3 = moderate disease (moderate erythema \[most plaques are red\], moderate induration and/or coarse scale predominates); 4=severe (severe erythema, marked to very marked elevation of lesions, coarse thick scale predominates).
Time frame: At Day 169 from Baseline
Short-term Period: Mean Percentage of Change From Baseline in Target Lesion Score at Day 169
Target lesion score measures the degree of erythema, induration, and scale of a psoriatic lesion with a diameter of at least 2 cm, selected as a target for response throughout the study period. Scores: 0=clear, 1=almost clear, 2=mild clear, 3=moderate disease, 4=severe. Percent improvement from baseline was computed using the ratio of improvement from baseline to the baseline value.
Time frame: At Day 169 from Baseline
Short-term Period: Number of Participants With Positive Responses for Serum Levels of Abatacept-specific Antibodies (Anti-Abatacept-C)
Meso Scale Discovery electrochemiluminescence, a validated, sensitive immunoassay technique (anti-abatacept assay C) was used to measure serum levels of abatacept-specific antibodies against the whole molecule (both the CTLA4 and possibly immunoglobulin G portion \[anti-abatacept antibody\].
Time frame: From Baseline to Day 169
Short-term Period: Mean Change From Baseline in the Mental Component Summary Score as Measured by the Short-form 36 at Day 169
PCS=physical component score; MCS=mental component score. The Short-form 36 is a 36-item instrument with physical and mental components and covers quality of life (QoL) domains: vitality, physical functioning, bodily pain, general health perceptions, physical role functioning, emotional role functioning, social role functioning, and mental health. Responses are used to derive physical and mental component summary scores, ranging from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better QoL. Mean change from baseline=postbaseline value-baseline value; a higher value signifies improvement.
Time frame: At Day 169 from Baseline
Short-term Period: Mean Serum Concentrations of Abatacept
Abatacept was assayed using a validated enzyme linked immunosorbent assay method (ELISA). Serum concentration versus time data was analyzed in the descriptive pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis.
Time frame: Days 1, 15, 29, 57, 85, 113, 141, and 169
Short-term Period: Mean Serum Trough Concentrations (Cmin) of Abatacept
Abatacept was assayed using a validated ELISA method. Cmin of abatacept was obtained from concentration versus time data.
Time frame: Days 1, 15, 29, 57, 85, 113, 141, and 169
Short-term Period: Population Pharmacokinetic (POPPK) Analysis of the Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters
PK data: summaries of concentrations and concentration versus time plots were obtained. These data were to be used to develop a POPPK model using a nonlinear mixed-effects model. Prediction of PK data for each of the 3 abatacept treatment groups using POPPK methodology was not performed, because it would not provide any relevant information over the observed PK data.
Time frame: Days 1, 15, 29, 57, 85, 113, 141, and 169
Short-term Period: Mean Change From Baseline in Physical Component Summary Score as Measured by the Short-form 36 at Day 169
PCS=physical component score; MCS=mental component score. The Short-form 36 is a 36-item instrument with physical and mental components and covers quality of life (QoL) domains: vitality, physical functioning, bodily pain, general health perceptions, physical role functioning, emotional role functioning, social role functioning, and mental health. Responses are used to derive physical and mental component summary scores, ranging from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better QoL. Mean change from baseline=postbaseline value-baseline value; a higher value signifies improvement.
Time frame: At Day 169 from Baseline
Short-term Period: Number of Participants Achieving a Reduction of At Least 0.3 Unit From Baseline in HAQ-DI Scores at Day 169
The HAQ-DI assesses a participant's ability to perform the following tasks: dress/groom; arise; eat; walk; reach; grip; maintain hygiene; and maintain daily activity over a period by marking their response on a questionnaire. Responses/scores range from: 0=without any difficulty, 1=with some difficulty, 2=with much difficulty, 3=to unable to do. Higher total score=greater disability.
Time frame: At Day 169 from Baseline