This was a parallel group, randomized, double blind, placebo controlled, multicentre study designed to assess whether vandetanib (ZD6474) conferred an improvement in PFS as compared to placebo in participants with locally advanced or metastatic papillary or follicular thyroid carcinoma failing or unsuitable for radioiodine therapy. The trial was of a sufficient size so that if vandetanib (ZD6474) was truly active there was a high probability that it would demonstrate an effect sufficiently promising to warrant a follow-up assessment. * Participants were seen weekly for the first 2 weeks, then again at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12 after randomization, and every 12 weeks thereafter. Upon disease progression, all participants (both active and placebo) were unblinded and given the option to discontinue blinded study treatment and enter follow up and survival, or begin open label vandetanib (ZD6474) 300 mg treatment. All participants were followed to collect survival data until greater than or equal to (\>=) 50% of participants had died. Participants who were taking vandetanib (ZD6474) at the time of study closure and wished to remain on therapy were allowed to continue for as long as the Investigator felt that they were obtaining clinical benefit, or until they were given another anti-cancer therapy. The safety data from all participants was assessed on an ongoing basis, including discontinuation and follow up. * Radiologic evaluation using RECIST criteria was performed every 12 weeks (+/- 2 weeks). All medical images were centralized assessed at the site and centrally reviewed. Participants were evaluated until progression, and then followed up for survival, regardless of whether they continued randomized treatment, unless they withdrew consent. Post progression open-label vandetanib (ZD6474) were offered at the investigators discretion. * All participants submitted a suitable archived tumor sample prior to randomization. In the event that a suitable archived sample was not available within 2 weeks prior to randomization, a fresh tumor sample was obtained in its place prior to randomization. If a participant underwent the fresh tumor biopsy procedure, this specimen would satisfy the first optional tumor biopsy submission should they consented to the exploratory part of the study.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
164
300 mg oral once daily oral dose
Research Site
Brussels, Belgium
Research Site
Odense, Denmark
Research Site
Angers, France
Research Site
Bordeaux, France
Research Site
Caen, France
Research Site
Lyon, France
Research Site
Marseille, France
Research Site
Paris, France
Research Site
Villejuif, France
Research Site
Oslo, Norway
...and 5 more locations
Time to Tumor Progression
modified RECIST V1.0 was used.
Time frame: Time from date of randomization to date of the first documented tumor progression or date of death from any cause (within the 3 months) of tumor assessment
Disease Control Rate at 6 Months
number of participants that achieved disease control 6 months after randomization. Best objective response of complete response + partial response + stable disease \> 24 weeks according to RECIST criteria
Time frame: 6 months after randomization
Objective Response Rate
Best objective response of the participants from an average of 46.7 months, defined as complete or partial response according to RECIST criteria
Time frame: 46.7 months
Time to Death
Interim analysis time to date of randomization to date of death (data not mature at the time of this analysis, so number of deaths displayed instead.
Time frame: time from randomization to date of death
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.