The purpose of this trial is to study the efficacy of a 35 mg delayed release weekly dosing regimen as compared to the standard daily dosing regimen of risedronate 5 mg daily.
The comparator arms of this risedronate study are 35 mg delayed release given weekly and 5 mg immediate release given daily.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
923
5 mg Immediate-release Risedronate Administered At Least 30 Minutes Before Breakfast Daily
35 mg Delayed-release Risedronate Administered Immediately Following Breakfast Weekly
35 mg Delayed-release Risedronate Administered At Least 30 Minutes Before Breakfast Weekly
Percent Change From Baseline Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Week 52 / Endpoint, ITT Population
Time frame: 52 weeks / Endpoint
Percent Change From Baseline Lumbar Spine BMD for Combined 35 mg Delayed-Release Weekly Treatment Group, Week 52 / Endpoint, ITT Population
Time frame: Week 52 / Endpoint
Percent Change From Baseline Lumbar Spine BMD, Week 26, ITT Population
Time frame: Week 26
Percent Change From Baseline Lumbar Spine BMD, Week 52, ITT Population
Time frame: Week 52
Percent Change From Baseline Lumbar Spine BMD at Week 104, ITT Population
Time frame: Week 104
Percent Change From Baseline Lumbar Spine BMD at Week 104 / Endpoint, ITT Population
Time frame: Week 104 / Endpoint
Percent Responders to Treatment (>0% Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine BMD), Week 52, ITT Population
Responder = a patient showing a positive change (\>0 g/cm2) in lumbar spine BMD from baseline to the timepoint.
Time frame: Week 52
Percent Responders to Treatment (>0% Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine BMD) at Week 52 / Endpoint, ITT Population
Responder = a patient showing a positive change (\>0 g/cm2) in lumbar spine BMD from baseline to the timepoint.
Time frame: Week 52 / Endpoint
Percent Responders to Treatment (>0% Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine BMD) at Week 104, ITT Population
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Research Site
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Research Site
Oakland, California, United States
Research Site
San Diego, California, United States
Research Facility
Walnut Creek, California, United States
Research Site
Walnut Creek, California, United States
Research Site
Lakewood, Colorado, United States
Research Site
Leesburg, Florida, United States
Research Site
Melbourne, Florida, United States
Research Site
South Miami, Florida, United States
Research Site
Gainesville, Georgia, United States
...and 35 more locations
Responder = a patient showing a positive change (\>0 g/cm2) in lumbar spine BMD from baseline to the timepoint.
Time frame: Week 52
Percent Responders to Treatment (>0% Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine BMD) at Week 104 / Endpoint, ITT Population
Responder = a patient showing a positive change (\>0 g/cm2) in lumbar spine BMD from baseline to the timepoint.
Time frame: Week 52 / Endpoint
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Proximal Femur BMD, Week 26, ITT Population
Time frame: Week 26
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Proximal Femur BMD, Week 52, ITT Population
Time frame: Week 52
Percent Change From Baseline Total Proximal Femur BMD, Week 52 / Endpoint, ITT Population
Time frame: Week 52 / Endpoint
Percent Change From Baseline Total Proximal Femur BMD, Week 104, ITT Population
Time frame: Week 104
Percent Change From Baseline Total Proximal Femur BMD, Week 104 / Endpoint, ITT Population
Time frame: Week 104 / Endpoint
Percent Change From Baseline in Femoral Neck BMD, Week 26, ITT Population
Time frame: Week 26
Percent Change From Baseline in Femoral Neck BMD, Week 52, ITT Population
Time frame: Week 52
Percent Change From Baseline in Femoral Neck BMD, Week 52 / Endpoint, ITT Population
Time frame: Week 52 / Endpoint
Percent Change From Baseline in Femoral Neck BMD, Week 104, ITT Population
Time frame: Week 104
Percent Change From Baseline in Femoral Neck BMD, Week 104 / Endpoint, ITT Population
Time frame: Week 104 / Endpoint
Percent Change From Baseline Greater Trochanter BMD, Week 26, ITT Population
Time frame: Week 26
Percent Change From Baseline in Greater Trochanter BMD, Week 52, ITT Population
Time frame: Week 52
Percent Change From Baseline in Greater Trochanter BMD, Week 52 / Endpoint
Time frame: Week 52 / Endpoint
Percent Change From Baseline in Greater Trochanter BMD, Week 104, ITT Population
Time frame: Week 104
Percent Change From Baseline in Greater Trochanter BMD, Week 104 / Endpoint
Time frame: Week 104 / Endpoint
Percent Change From Baseline Urine Type-I Collagen N-telopeptide/ Creatinine (NTX/Cr), Week 13, ITT Population
Time frame: Week 13
Percent Change From Baseline Urine Type-I Collagen N-telopeptide / Creatinine (NTX / Cr), Week 26, ITT Population
Time frame: Week 26
Percent Change From Baseline Urine Type-I Collagen N-telopeptide / Creatinine (NTX / Cr), Week 52, ITT Population
Time frame: Week 52
Percent Change From Baseline Urine Type-I Collagen N-telopeptide / Creatinine (NTX / Cr), Week 52 / Endpoint, ITT Population
Time frame: Week 52 / Endpoint
Percent Change From Baseline Urine Type-I Collagen N-telopeptide / Creatinine (NTX / Cr), Week 104, ITT Population
Time frame: Week 104
Percent Change From Baseline Urine Type-I Collagen N-telopeptide / Creatinine (NTX / Cr), Week 104 / Endpoint, ITT Population
Time frame: Week 104 / Endpoint
Percent Change From Baseline Serum Type-I Collagen C-telopeptide (CTX), Week 13, ITT Population
Time frame: Week 13
Percent Change From Baseline Serum Type-I Collagen C-telopeptide (CTX), Week 26, ITT Population
Time frame: Week 26
Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Type-I Collagen C-telopeptide (CTX), Week 52, ITT Population
Time frame: Week 52
Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Type-I Collagen C-telopeptide (CTX), Week 52 / Endpoint, ITT Population
Time frame: Week 52 / Endpoint
Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Type-I Collagen C-telopeptide (CTX), Week 104, ITT Population
Time frame: Week 104
Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Type-I Collagen C-telopeptide (CTX), Week 104 / Endpoint, ITT Population
Time frame: Week 104 / Endpoint
Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Bone-specific Alkaline Phosphatase, Week 13, ITT Population
Time frame: Week 13
Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Bone-specific Alkaline Phosphatase, Week 26, ITT Population
Time frame: Week 26
Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Bone-specific Alkaline Phosphatase, Week 52, ITT Population
Time frame: Week 52
Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Bone-specific Alkaline Phosphatase, Week 52 / Endpoint, ITT Population
Time frame: Week 52 / Endpoint
Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Bone-specific Alkaline Phosphatase, Week 104, ITT Population
Time frame: Week 104
Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Bone-specific Alkaline Phosphatase, Week 104 / Endpoint, ITT Population
Time frame: Week 104 / Endpoint
Number of Patients With at Least One New Fractured Vertebra, Week 52
Time frame: Week 52
Number of Patients With at Least One New Fractured Vertebra, Week 52 / Endpoint, ITT Population
Time frame: Week 52 / Endpoint
Number of Patients With at Least One New Fractured Vertebra, Week 104, ITT Population
Time frame: Week 104
Number of Patients With at Least One New Fractured Vertebra, Week 104 / Endpoint, ITT Population
Time frame: Week 104 / Endpoint
Number of Patients With No New Fractured Vertebra, Week 52
Time frame: Week 52
Number of Patients With No New Fractured Vertebra, Week 52 / Endpoint
Time frame: Week 52 / Endpoint
Number of Patients With No New Fractured Vertebra, Week 104
Time frame: Week 104
Number of Patients With No New Fractured Vertebra, Week 104 / Endpoint
Time frame: Week 104 / Endpoint