The purpose of this study is to evaluate three methods of performing home-based assessments in Alzheimer's Disease (AD) prevention trials. The initial in-person assessment will be done in the clinic or at home.
There is an unmet need for effective, efficient, and economical methods for conducting AD prevention trials. Traditional in-person visits to clinical assessment sites are time consuming and costly and may exclude some people from participation, such as those who are older, or are less mobile or with significant medical illnesses. These may be the people who are at greatest risk for cognitive decline, and also may be without financial resources for services such as transportation to a study site. Prevention trials require long observation periods and these same issues of health, resources, and transportation may cause significant drop out. These obstacles increase expense of clinical trials which require large sample sizes, costly clinical staff and long observation periods. Thus, home-based assessments may lead to more representative recruitment of those most at risk for decline, as well as better retention and reduced study costs. This is a randomized study of 600 participants, comparing three methods of test administration and data collection. Each enrolled participant will have an In-person (Standard) assessment (in the clinic or at home) prior to baseline. Participants will be classified as either normal or MCI (Mild Cognitive Impairment) and randomly assigned to an assessment method and to a frequency of assessment. Cognitive performance, self-rated cognitive complaint, functioning in daily life, affective symptoms, global change, quality of life and resource use will all be assessed in each method at each visit. The total time for the at-home assessments will be approximately 45 minutes. In addition, all participants will be provided a multi-vitamin to be taken twice a day, and a measure of medication adherence will be collected for each assessment method. Changes in certain cognitive measures may "trigger" an in-person assessment, in which participants may change from a categorization of normal or amnestic MCI, to non-amnestic MCI, impaired not MCI, or dementia (i.e., specifically Alzheimer's Disease or another dementia). We estimate that 12% of the study population will trigger over the 4 years of the study and will progress to a more impaired diagnostic category. In addition, a random sample of non-triggered cases (25%) will be selected for an in-person re-assessment during the 4 years of the protocol as a comparison for the trigger group. At the end of the 4-year study period all participants will undergo an in-person evaluation.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SCREENING
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
640
This group will receive assessments of all domains by mail, except for the cognitive performance assessment which will be administered via phone by a live, trained evaluator. Medication compliance will be monitored by a written medication log which will be returned by mail with the other mail-in assessments.
In this group, participants will be asked to answer questions via an automated phone system using interactive voice recognition (IVR) and key-pad response entry. Medication compliance will be monitored by the same method. A standard large-key telephone and training in the use of the interactive phone system will be provided to all participants.
Feasibility Data -- the number of subjects recruited, screened, enrolled, and retained
Time frame: 4 years
Efficiency Data -- staff time required to successfully complete data collection
Time frame: Each experimental visit
Transition from cognitive health to impairment
Time frame: 4 years
Method-Specific Adherence, including medication adherence
Time frame: 4 years
Rate of change in domains of assessment
Time frame: 4 years
Research blood samples
Time frame: 4 years
Safety Assessments: symptom checklist and adverse event checklist
Time frame: 4 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Participants at entry will receive a special Kiosk-like device for collecting assessment information and will be taught to use this device. The user interface will consist of a monitor with a touch screen and a telephone handset, similar to what is often used in museum displays. Pre-recorded instructions will be delivered through the handset as well as displayed visually on the screen. Data will be collected using the handset's high-quality microphone. Daily activity assessments of timed medication use will be obtained via an automated medication tracking device.
Evaluation methods typically used in clinical trials
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Sun Health Reseach Institute
Sun City, Arizona, United States
University of California, Irvine Institute for Brain Aging and Dementia
Irvine, California, United States
University of California-San Diego ADRC/Neurosciences
La Jolla, California, United States
University of California, Davis
Martinez, California, United States
Stanford University / PAIRE
Palo Alto, California, United States
Yale University Alzheimer's Disease Research Unit
New Haven, Connecticut, United States
Georgetown University
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
Mayo Clinic Jacksonville Neurology
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
Wien Center
Miami Beach, Florida, United States
...and 18 more locations