To compare a surgical approach of LV lead placement for BIV pacing with the conventional transvenous approach by assessment of differences on the effects on cardiac perfusion and relate this to the clinical cardiac function.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
52
epicardial left ventricular lead placement
implantation of biventricular pacemaker with transvenous left ventricular lead placement
St Antonius Hospital
Nieuwegein, Utrecht, Netherlands
Degree of change in cardiac perfusion following epicardial LV lead placement, compared to transvenous LV lead placement
Time frame: 6 months
Resynchronization of the LV, measured with TDI, 2D- and 3D-echocardiography, in patients with epicardial LV lead placement, compared to transvenous LV lead placement
Time frame: 6 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.