This 2 x 2 sequential factorial study evaluates two potential improvements to the standard immunosuppression regimen used at the investigators' institution to prevent rejection of transplanted kidneys. These two potential improvements are each applied in sequence to half of the study patients, creating 4 study arms; the other half receive the standard treatment. The two potential improvements are: 1. Administering the immunosuppression induction agent rATG ("rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin") in a single dose at the time of transplantation, instead of in the usual series of 4 smaller doses over 6 days. 2. After 6 months, modifying the maintenance immunosuppression used to prevent rejection by replacing the drug tacrolimus with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). The two interventions, spaced sequentially six months apart, enable independent analysis of the two treatments so long as it can be shown that there is no synergistic interaction between them.
The two treatment innovations in this study of immunosuppression in kidney transplantation are aimed at making the transplanted kidney function sooner and last longer than is usual with standard immunosuppression regimens, but without increasing the likelihood of rejection. The first innovation, delivering the induction agent rATG in a single large dose rather than as a series of smaller doses over 6-8 days, is expected to produce better graft function right away, possibly by reducing some of the injury to the kidney that accompanies the restoration of blood flow during transplantation ("reperfusion injury"). Some evidence has been developed by investigators elsewhere to suggest this will happen. The second innovation, replacing tacrolimus with MMF after 6 months, is intended to eliminate a well-established major cause of ongoing toxic damage to the kidney. While tacrolimus does a good job of preventing rejection, the cost in continuing toxic injury to the kidney is high, leading inevitably to eventual graft failure, the inability of the transplanted kidney to continue filtering the blood and making adequate volumes of high-quality urine.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
180
A single 6 mg/kg dose of rATG administered intravenously over 24 hours, beginning before kidney transplantation. Administration of the drug is begun as early as practical, usually after general anesthesia has been established but before surgery has started. The rATG is therefore administered for about two hours before blood flow is restored to the kidney undergoing transplantation.
Patients are switched approximately 6 months after kidney transplantation from maintenance immunosuppression with tacrolimus and sirolimus to maintenance with mycophenolate mofetil and sirolimus. The drug is administered orally, taken daily, with dose adjusted in proportion to measured blood levels, and is required indefinitely to prevent rejection of the transplanted kidney.
6 mg/kg rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin delivered in 4 doses of 1.5 mg/kg each, the first administered at the time of kidney transplantation. Subsequent doses are administered on days 2, 4, and 6.
Oral maintenance immunosuppressant administered daily, dose adjusted according to measured serum trough levels, continued indefinitely to prevent kidney rejection
Oral maintenance immunosuppressant, taken daily, dose adjusted to maintain target blood trough levels, required indefinitely to prevent kidney rejection.
Unversity of Nebraska Medical Center
Omaha, Nebraska, United States
Chronic Allograft Nephropathy (Cumulative Calcineurin-inhibitor Nephrotoxicity/Transplant Nephropathy) Per Protocol Surveillance Kidney Biopsies (Banff Grading Criteria).
Protocol kidney biopsies collected at approximately 12 and 24 months were scored by a transplant renal pathologist blinded to treatment group assignment for evidence of rejection, BK virus nephropathy, antibody-mediated rejection, recurrent disease, inflammation, and Banff 2005 categories of chronic renal injury. Chronic injury categories were arteriolar hyaline thickening (ah), allograft glomerulopathy (cg), interstitial fibrosis (ci), tubular atrophy (ct), and vascular fibrous intimal thickening (cv). Severity scores within each category could be 0 (\<5%; none or minimal), 1 (\>5% - \<25%; mild), 2 (\>25% - \<50%, moderate), or 3 (\>50%, severe). The proportions of patients in each severity grade (0, 1, 2, and 3) for both the individual categories and a composite were compared using Fisher's exact test.
Time frame: Two years
Average of Renal Function
Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) by using the abbreviated MDRD (aMDRD) formula and patient serum creatinine and demographic data; averaged values from months four through 24.
Time frame: Two years
Safety Profile
Number of events: cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease, opportunistic infections (bacteremia, abscess, pneumonia, fungal), Post-transplantation Lymphoproliferative Disorder (PTLD), wound healing problems within 30 days, and lymphoceles.
Time frame: Two years
Requirement for Additional Immunosuppression (Such as Corticosteroids, Antimetabolites or Other Immunosuppressive Agents)
Time frame: Two years
Acute Rejection Per Kidney Biopsy (Banff Grading Criteria)
Time frame: Two years
Acute Tubular Necrosis (ATN) Rate, Defined as the Requirement for Dialysis Within 7 Days Post-transplantation.
Time frame: Seven days
Graft Survival
Graft failure = permanent return of patient to dialysis.
Time frame: Two years
Patient Survival
Time frame: Two years
Lymphoid Cell Sub-type CD3 Absolute Numbers
Time frame: One year
New-onset Polyomavirus (BK Virus) Disease Per Kidney Biopsy
Time frame: Two years
New-onset Diabetes and Hyperglycemia After Transplantation (NODAT)
Time frame: Six months
Ratio of CD4/CD8 Lymphoid Cells
Time frame: One year
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.