Typically, people with asthma are initially prescribed a low dose of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) medication to control asthma symptoms. If a low dose of ICS is ineffective at controlling symptoms, the addition of a second controller medication is recommended. This study will examine the effectiveness of the medication tiotropium bromide combined with a low dose of ICS at maintaining asthma control in people with moderately severe asthma.
National and international asthma treatment guidelines recommend ICS as the initial controller therapy for people with asthma who are in need of daily treatment with a controller medication. If treatment with low to moderate doses of ICS is not sufficient to gain and maintain asthma control, current guidelines recommend adding a second controller medication rather than increasing the dose of ICS. Current options for the second medication include a long-acting beta-agonist, a leukotriene modifier, or theophylline. It is possible that other medications, not yet tested, could fill the role of the second controller medication. Tiotropium bromide is a medication that is used to treat chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). It works by relaxing and opening the air passages to the lungs to make breathing easier. For people with asthma, the addition of tiotropium bromide may be a good option as a second controller medication. The purpose of this study is to determine if combining tiotropium bromide with a low dose of ICS is more effective than doubling the dose of ICS in people with moderately severe asthma. This study will also examine whether the addition of tiotropium bromide to low dose ICS is as effective as the addition of a long-acting beta-agonist at maintaining asthma control. This study will begin with a 4-week run-in period during which participants will be monitored while they use an inhaler containing a low dose of ICS medication. Next, participants will be assigned to take part in either the TALC study or the Best Adjustment Strategy for Asthma in Long Term (BASALT) study, which is a separate Asthma Clinical Research Network (ACRN) study. All TALC participants will then undergo three 16-week treatment periods, which will include the following: * tiotropium bromide inhalation powder 18 mcg once daily (Tio) plus beclomethasone dipropionate 80 mcg twice daily (1xICS) * salmeterol xinafoate inhalation powder 50 mcg twice daily (LABA) plus beclomethasone dipropionate 80 mcg twice daily (1xICS) * beclomethasone dipropionate 160 mcg twice daily (2xICS) The order in which the three treatment periods will occur will be randomly assigned for each participant. Each of the three 16-week treatment periods will consist of 14 weeks of treatment followed by a 2-week washout period, in which participants will receive a single does of ICS. Study visits will occur at baseline and Weeks 2 and 4 of the 4-week run-in period, and at Weeks 4, 9, 14, and 16 of each 16-week treatment period. Spirometry tests to measure lung function will occur at each study visit and exhaled nitric oxide testing and questionnaires to assess asthma control and symptoms will occur at most visits. During study visits at Week 4 of the run-in period and Week 14 of each treatment period, lung function measurements, sputum collection, questionnaires to assess asthma quality-of-life, and measurements of sleep and daytime alertness will all occur. Participants will also record asthma symptoms, peak flow measurements, and medication usage in a daily diary.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
210
tiotropium bromide inhalation powder 18 mcg once daily
salmeterol xinafoate inhalation powder 50 mcg twice daily
beclomethasone dipropionate 80 mcg twice daily (1xICS) or 160 mcg twice daily (2xICS)
University of California, San Diego
San Diego, California, United States
University of California, San Francisco
San Francisco, California, United States
National Jewish Medical and Research Center
Denver, Colorado, United States
Brigham & Women's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Washington University, St. Louis
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Columbia University Health Sciences
New York, New York, United States
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, United States
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
University of Texas Medical Branch
Galveston, Texas, United States
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Madison, Wisconsin, United States
Change Between Week 14 and Week 0 in the Morning (AM) Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF)
Time frame: AM PEF was measured daily during each of the three 14-week treatment periods. The primary analysis constructed the change between week 14 and week 0.
Change Between Week 14 and Week 0 in the Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1)
Time frame: FEV1 was measured on four occasions during each of the three 14-week treatment periods. The primary analysis constructed the change between week 14 and week 0.
Change Between Week 14 and Week 0 in Asthma Symptoms
Asthma symptoms were recorded as 0 (absent = no symptom ) 1. (mild = symptom was minimally troublesome, i.e. not sufficient to interfere with normal daily activity or sleep) 2. (moderate = symptom was sufficiently troublesome to interfere with normal daily activity or sleep) 3. (severe = symptom was so severe as to prevent normal activity and/or sleep )
Time frame: Asthma symptoms were measured daily during each of the three 14-week treatment periods. The primary analysis constructed the change between week 14 and week 0.
Change Between Week 14 and Week 0 in the Asthma Quality-of-life Questionnaire Score
Scores on the Asthma Quality-of-Life Questionnaire range from 1 to 7, with a higher score indicating a better quality of life.
Time frame: The asthma quality-of-life questionnaire score was measured on four occasions during each of the three 14-week treatment periods. The primary analysis constructed the change between week 14 and week 0.
Change Between Week 14 and Week 0 in the Asthma Control Questionnaire Score
Scores on the Asthma Control Questionnaire range from 0 to 6, with a higher score indicating worse asthma control.
Time frame: The asthma control questionnaire score was measured on four occasions during each of the three 14-week treatment periods. The primary analysis constructed the change between week 14 and week 0.
Change Between Week 14 and Week 0 in the Albuterol Rescue Puffs Per Day
Total number of puffs from the albuterol (rescue) inhaler during the previous 24 hours (excluding those puffs for preventive use).
Time frame: Albuterol rescue puffs were measured daily during each of the three 14-week treatment periods. The primary analysis constructed the change between week 14 and week 0.
Change Between Week 14 and Week 0 in the Proportion of Asthma Control Days
An asthma control day was defined as a day in which there were no symptoms and no albuterol (rescue) puffs.
Time frame: An asthma control day was determined daily during each of the three 14-week treatment periods. The primary analysis constructed the change between week 14 and week 0.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.