RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. It is not yet known whether giving paclitaxel together with carboplatin is more effective than giving temozolomide alone in treating patients with melanoma. PURPOSE: This phase II trial is studying the side effects and how well giving paclitaxel together with carboplatin or giving temozolomide alone works in treating patients with stage IV melanoma.
OBJECTIVES: * To assess the anti-tumor activity and toxicity profile of timed delivery of conventional paclitaxel and carboplatin (PC) in patients with stage IV melanoma who have received prior chemotherapy for their metastatic disease. * To assess the anti-tumor activity and toxicity profile of timed delivery of conventional temozolomide (TMZ) chemotherapy in patients with stage IV melanoma who have received prior chemotherapy for their metastatic disease. * To assess the anti-tumor activity and toxicity profile of timed delivery of conventional PC in patients with stage IV melanoma who have not received prior chemotherapy for their metastatic disease. * To assess the anti-tumor activity and toxicity profile of timed delivery of conventional TMZ chemotherapy in patients with stage IV melanoma who have not received prior chemotherapy for their metastatic disease. * To evaluate the changes of T-regulator cells, melanoma-specific functional parameters as a function of time in all four patient cohorts. OUTLINE: Patients are stratified according to prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease (yes vs no) and scheduled chemotherapy regimen (paclitaxel and carboplatin vs temozolomide). Beginning at the predicted day of C-reactive peptide (CRP) peak levels, patients receive paclitaxel IV and carboplatin IV on days 1, 8, and 15 OR oral temozolomide alone on days 1-5. Treatment repeats every 4 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients undergo blood sample collection periodically for pharmacological studies. Samples are analyzed for CRP quantification via ELISA; presence and number of circulating blood T-regulator cells via immunophenotyping for CD4/CD25+ and CD4/fox-p3+ T cells; level of functional immunity against melanoma specific antigens (MART-1, tyrosinase, and gp100) and survivin in patients that are HLA-A2+ via intracellular staining; total number of cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) capable of reacting against melanoma targets via tetramer staining (Becton-Coulter); and quantification of interferon γ-producing, peptide-specific CTLs via multicolor conventional flow cytometry. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed every 3 months for up to 2 years.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
12
AUC=2 intravenously on days 1, 8 and 15. Re-treat every 4 weeks until progression, unacceptable toxicity, or refusal
100mg/m\^2 intravenously on days 1, 8 and 15. Re-treat every 4 weeks until progression, unacceptable toxicity, or refusal
150mg/m\^2 at cycle 1, 200mg/m\^2 at cycle 2 and beyond, orally on days 1-5. Re-treat every 4 weeks until progression, unacceptable toxicity, or refusal. One treatment cycle=four weeks
Mayo Clinic Cancer Center
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
Number of Participants With an Objective Tumor Status of Either a Complete Response(CR) or Partial Response (PR), According to RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) Criteria
Response that was noted on 2 consecutive evaluations for at least 4 weeks apart. CR: Disappearance of all target lesions; PR: At least a 30 percent of decrease in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesions taking as reference the baseline sum LD. Target lesions: All measurable lesions up to a maximum of 10 lesions representative of all involved organs.
Time frame: Every other cycle of therapy (cycle=4 weeks) for the first 6 cycles of treatment
Time to Disease Progression
Time to disease progression was defined as the time from registration to documentation of disease progression. Disease progression was measured according to the RECIST criteria. Progression: At least a 20 percent increase in the sum of of target lesions taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions.
Time frame: up to 2 years
Survival Time
Survival time was defined as the time from registration to death due to any cause.
Time frame: up to 2 years
Duration of Response for All Evaluable Patients Who Have Achieved an Objective Response
Duration of response was defined as the date at which the participant's objective status was first noted to be either a Complete Response or Partial Response to the date the progression was documented.
Time frame: up to 2 years
Number of Participants Who Experienced Changes in Immunologic Profile (CD4/CD25+ Cells, CD4/Fox-p3+ T Cells) Within a Treatment
Time series plot of the number of circulating cells will be constructed. The resulting plots will be visually inspected for trends within and between treatments. For each cell type, a point and an interval estimate of the number of participants (receiving a given treatment) who had at least a 2-fold increase in the number of circulating cells of that type will be constructed using the properties of the binomial distribution.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: up to 2 years
Number of Participants Who Experienced Changes in Immunologic Profile (MART-1, Tyrosinase, and gp100) Within a Treatment
For those patients who are HLA-A2+, the maximum post-treatment levels of MART-1, tyrosinase, and gp100 will be determined. For each of these specific melanoma specific antigens, the number of participants (within a given treatment) who gained or maintained immunity based on the maximum post-treatment level of that specific melanoma specific antigen will be determined.
Time frame: up to 2 years
Number of Participants Who Experienced Changes in Immunologic Profile (IFNγ Producing Peptide Specific CTLs) Within a Treatment
For each patient, a time series plot of the number of IFNγ producing peptide specific CTLs will be constructed. The resulting plots will be visually inspected for trends within and between treatments. A point and an interval estimate of the number of participants (receiving a given treatment) who had at least a 2-fold increase in the number of the number of IFNγ producing peptide specific CTLs will be constructed using the properties of the binomial distribution.
Time frame: up to 2 years