Oral leukoplakia within the mouth is a visible white patch which can develop into cancer if not treated. There is no good treatment for these lesions, apart from surgery which is associated with significant side effects and physical deformation of the treated area. The investigators hypothesized that photodynamic therapy can be used safely and effectively to induce significant regression of oral leukoplakia.
This is a combined Phase I/II non-randomized prospective study designed to determine the safety and assess the clinical efficacy of PDT in the treatment of oral leukeplekia with 5-ALA and 585-nm PDL with 1.5 ms pulse time. In the first part of the study we determined the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the PDL radiant exposure in combination with 5-ALA. In the second phase of the study, this dose is used to treat subjects at the MTD in order to determine the efficacy of the treatment by documenting the regression of the treated lesions.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
29
PDT Treatment; emits light with 585 nm wavelength in pulses of 1.5 milliseconds in sections of 5 mm diameter to target the lesion and surrounding tissue
Topically administered; incubation time 60-180 minutes; single dose (345 mg of active 5-ALA in 1.5 ml solution); soaked onto white gauze and applied to lesion, covered with sterile Xeroform gauze
FD Image taken prior to PDL-585 usage
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
Maximum Tolerated Dose
The traditional 3+3 dose escalation design was employed. Three cohorts were enrolled at 3 subjects per cohort, and treated with escalating radiant exposures of 6, 7, or 8 J/cm2. In each cohort, the number of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed. Dose escalation rules were the same as those provided by Storer 1989.
Time frame: Day 2
The Objective Response Rate is the Number of Participants With Significant Response (SR), Partial Response (PR) or No Response (NR).
The response rate was quantified by examination by an experienced head and neck surgeon and classified as follows: significant response (SR) was one where the lesion had greater than 75% resolution, partial response (PR) was one in which the lesion was reduced in size by at least 25%, and no response (NR) was one where the lesion was reduced by less than 25% in size.
Time frame: Day 90
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.