The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether there is a difference between conservative and operative treatment of Superior Labral Lesions(SLAP)of the shoulder.
Treatment of superior labral lesions is controversial. Some authors advocate labral repair, some advocate biceps tenodesis,and others again questions whether these lesions should be repaired at all. There are no randomized studies comparing operative treatment and conservative treatment(i.e. physical rehabilitation), and likewise no randomized studies comparing labral repair and biceps tenodesis. In this study;all patients who have a patient history, clinical signs of a SLAP lesion,a MRI study revealing an isolated superior labral lesion and have agreed to participate in the study, will have a diagnostic arthroscopy performed. If a SLAP lesion is diagnosed, the patients are randomized to three different groups:1) SLAP repair with suture anchors 2) Biceps tenodesis 3) Physical therapy
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
118
labral repair with suture anchors
biceps tenodesis with suture anchor
diagnostic arthroscopy
Lovisenberg Diakonale Hospital
Oslo, Oslo County, Norway
WOSI score Constant score EQ-5D Rowe score Patient Satisfaction
Time frame: 6 and 24 months
Sick leave Time back to sports at preoperative level
Time frame: 6 and 24 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.