The main purpose of this study is to see if using proton beam radiation therapy instead of photon beam radiation therapy can reduce side effects from radiation treatment for rhabdomyosarcoma. Photon beam radiation is the standard type of radiation for treating most rhabdomyosarcoma and many other types of cancer. Photon beam radiation enters the body and passes through healthy tissue, encounters the tumor, then leaves the body through healthy tissue. A beam of proton radiation enters the body and passes through healthy tissue, encounters tumor, but then stops. This means that less healthy tissue is affected by proton beam radiation than by photon beam radiation.
* A special device is made for each participant to help them hold still during the treatment. This may be in the form of a mask or a custom made foam cradle depending on the area to be treated. * Radiation treatments will be given once per day, 5 days a week for a total of 4 to 6 weeks, depending upon how much total dose the tumor requires. * Participants will be seen once per week by their radiation doctor to monitor health and record any side effects from treatment. * After the radiation treatments are completed, participants will be required to undergo further tests and evaluations for several years following treatment.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
115
Once per day, 5 days a week for a total of 4 to 6 weeks.
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, United States
Cumulative Incidence (Estimated Percent of Participants) With Grade 3 or Higher Toxicity in Follow-up
Cumulative incidence of participants who experienced a toxicity defined as either grade 3, 4, or 5 after the completion of radiation therapy in pediatric patients with pediatric rhabdomyosarcomas. Late toxicity is scored on a yearly follow-up basis for at least five years. Late toxicities will be graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), Version 3.0. Cumulative incidence is shown at 5 years follow-up.
Time frame: 5 years from the start of radiation treatment
Percentage of Participants Who Experienced an Acute Toxicity by Grade
Percentage of participants who experienced an acute toxicity following completion of radiation treatment by grade. Acute toxicity will be scored at weekly status check visits by the radiation oncology nurse or doctor. In addition, acute toxicity will be scored at least one time within the 3 months following completion of radiation therapy. The recommended evaluation time for acute toxicity after radiotherapy was 6 weeks following completion, but may be at any time during the 3 months after treatment. Acute toxicities are graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), Version 3.0. Toxicities are graded on a scale of 1 to 5. A higher grade indicates a worse outcome with 1 being mild, 4 being life-threatening, and 5 being death.
Time frame: 3 months from radiation treatment
Dosimetric Comparison
Comparison of dose distribution to tumor and surrounding normal structures using dose volume histograms (DVH) generated from the proton plan used to treat the patient and the photon plan generated for comparison purposes. Percent of normal tissue spared was calculated using the following equation: (100 x (mean x-ray dose - mean proton dose))/mean X-ray dose. No measure of dispersion was calculated for these estimates. The data is no longer available.
Time frame: 4 years from the start of radiation treatment
Local Control
Estimated survival probability (defined as being free of a local recurrence) was calculated using Grays formula for competing risks
Time frame: 5 years from the start of radiation therapy
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.