Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), a condition characterized by low platelet levels and possible blood clots, occurs in a small number of people after treatment with the drug heparin. Some people with HIT may show symptoms of a blood clot at the time of HIT diagnosis, but in another form of HIT, known as isolated HIT, people do not show blood clot symptoms even though they might have a blood clot. This study will use ultrasound tests to evaluate the presence of blood clots at the time of an HIT diagnosis and in the following month.
Heparin is a blood thinning medication that is often prescribed to treat or prevent blood clots. HIT is a life-threatening immune disorder that occurs in 1 to 3% of people who receive heparin. In this disorder, heparin does the opposite of what it is supposed to do: it promotes new blood clot formation, rather than preventing it. In people with HIT, the immune system triggers a response against heparin, leading to the destruction of platelets and a low platelet count, which is known as thrombocytopenia. Symptoms usually occur between 5 to 14 days after starting heparin therapy. Isolated HIT is a form of the condition that occurs when people have a low platelet count, but there is no sign of a blood clot, or thrombosis. Several small research studies have shown that at the time of isolated HIT diagnosis, between 15 to 50% of people actually have asymptomatic thrombosis, which means that they are not showing any signs of a blood clot, but in fact have one. In the month following HIT diagnosis, up to 50% of people experience symptomatic thrombosis, which means that they are showing signs of a blood clot. It is not currently known how to best treat isolated HIT and how to test for unrecognized blood clots. This study will use ultrasound imaging to evaluate the number of people who have asymptomatic thrombosis at the time of isolated HIT diagnosis and to determine the rate of symptomatic and asymptomatic thrombosis in the following month. The results of this study will assist researchers in assessing current approaches to treating isolated HIT and in designing new clinical trials. By exploring the use of non-invasive evaluation techniques in people with HIT, thrombosis research in HIT will move forward, similar to thrombosis research in other medical conditions. This 29-day study will enroll hospital patients who have a diagnosis of HIT but show no signs of a blood clot at the time of HIT diagnosis. On Day 1, participants will undergo blood collection and an ultrasound. While participants are in the hospital, study researchers will review participants' medical records on a daily basis to collect data on current medications, medication compliance, symptoms, bleeding, thrombosis complications, and laboratory test results. Once participants leave the hospital, this data will be collected at least once a week through phone calls with the participant and/or the treating physician. On Day 29, participants will undergo a repeat ultrasound and blood collection.
Emory University
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
The Percentage of Participants With Asymptomatic Thrombosis at the Time Isolated Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) is Diagnosed, Determined by Four-limb Ultrasound
The percentage of participants with asymptomatic thrombosis at the time isolated HIT is diagnosed as determined by four-limb ultrasound.
Time frame: Measured at Day 1
The Percentage of Participants With Asymptomatic Thrombosis 4 Weeks After the Diagnosis of Isolated HIT, Determined by Four-limb Ultrasound
The percentage of participants with asymptomatic thrombosis 4 weeks after the diagnosis of isolated HIT, determined by four-limb ultrasound, and 95% exact binomial confidence interval.
Time frame: Measured at Day 35 (+/- 7days)
The Number of Participants With Symptomatic Venous or Arterial Thromboembolism in the Month Following the Diagnosis of Isolated HIT
There were two versions of the data collection form used in this study, and only the revised version collected information on whether the event was symptomatic.
Time frame: Measured within 35 days (+/- 7) after the diagnosis of isolated HIT
The Number of Participants With Incidental Arterial and Venous Thromboembolism (i.e., a Clot Diagnosed by Radiographic Tests Done for Reasons Other Than to Diagnose or Rule Out a Thromboembolic Event)
There were two versions of the data collection form used in this study, and only the revised form contained information on whether the event was incidental.
Time frame: Measured within 35 days (+/- 7) after the diagnosis of isolated HIT
The Time to First Bleeding Event With Current Therapies for Isolated HIT
The time to first bleeding event was analyzed using survival analysis.
Time frame: Measured within 35 days (+/- 7) after the diagnosis of isolated HIT
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
10
University of Iowa
Iowa City, Iowa, United States
Tulane University
New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
University of Maryland
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Johns Hopkins Hospital
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Children's Hospital Boston
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
University of Minnesota
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
...and 11 more locations
Time Until Death From All Causes
The time until death from all causes, in days, was determined using survival analysis.
Time frame: Measured within 35 days (+/- 7) after the diagnosis of isolated HIT
Time to Platelet Count Recovery
The time to platelet recovery was defined as the time from the nadir platelet count observed in the five days after the positive HIT test was sent to observing a platelet count of 100K or greater. Survival analysis was used.
Time frame: Measured within 35 days (+/- 7) after the diagnosis of isolated HIT
Number of Days That Medications Were Given to Participants at Participating Institutions
Per the protocol, descriptive statistics on the types and durations of therapeutic approaches used will be presented.
Time frame: Measured within 35 days (+/- 7) after the diagnosis of isolated HIT
Length of Hospital Stay
The length of time between the date of HIT diagnosis and first hospital discharge was calculated. Subjects were censored at death. Survival analysis was used.
Time frame: Measured upon hospital discharge
Length of Hospital Stay (With Deaths Not Censored)
The length of time between the date of HIT diagnosis and first hospital discharge was calculated. Subjects were not censored at death. Survival analysis was used.
Time frame: Measured upon hospital discharge
Relationship Between the Platelet Factor 4 (PF4)-Heparin Enzyme-Linked ImmunoSorbent Assay (ELISA) Test, the Serotonin-release Assay, and D-dimer Test Results
Analysis not performed since central laboratory tests were not done.
Time frame: Measured at Day 1
Relationship Between PF4-heparin ELISA Test, Serotonin-release Assay, and D-dimer Test Results and Thromboembolism
Analysis not performed since central laboratory tests were not done.
Time frame: Measured at Day 1 and within 35 days (+/- 7) after the diagnosis of isolated HIT
Relationship Between the Presence of the Factor V Leiden Mutation or the Prothrombin 20210 Mutation and the Risk of Thrombosis
Analysis not performed since central laboratory tests were not done.
Time frame: Measured at Day 1 and within 35 days (+/- 7) after the diagnosis of isolated HIT