Closing The Post Fracture Care Gap In Manitoba

Overview

The objective of this study is to evaluate a post-fracture intervention for improving osteoporosis care in older men and women who have suffered a fracture that may indicate the presence of osteoporosis. Although osteoporosis can be identified with a bone mineral density (BMD) test, most individuals with osteoporosis are not diagnosed until they fracture. Post-fracture care often "falls between the cracks" when there is a breakdown in communication between hospital and community, or between specialists and primary care physicians. Often physicians and patients fail to make the connection between an acute fracture and osteoporosis, or the value of secondary prevention strategies. If untreated, there is an extremely high rate of additional fractures after a first osteoporotic fracture. It follows that improving BMD testing and/or treatment in appropriately identified individuals is a necessary step in optimizing post-fracture patient care. Over the next three years we will be testing and optimizing a notification procedure to physicians and/or patients relying upon fracture events reported to the provincial health service (Manitoba Health).

A major 'care gap' exists in the management of patients with fractures suggestive of osteoporosis. Currently, only a small minority of these individuals who are at high risk for recurrent fractures undergo evaluation for possible treatment. We propose to test and optimize a novel approach to address this question, relying upon fracture events reported to provincial health service (Manitoba Health) as a mechanism for osteoporosis case identification and enhancing post fracture care. Phase 1 (one year duration): individuals meeting the fracture case definition will be randomized to usual care (no intervention), physician notification and physician/patient notification. The notification will provide a general recommendation for osteoporosis assessment. The use of appropriate post-fracture investigations and treatment will be prospectively evaluated. Phase 2 (up to two years duration): the intervention will be refined and iteratively trialed for all individuals meeting the fracture case definition. Phase 3: a recommendation for long term maintenance of the post-fracture intervention will be developed.