To test the hypothesis that home international normalised ratio (INR) monitoring with supervised patient self-testing (PST)can provide comparable or superior time in therapeutic range (TTR) to that provided by traditional outpatient anticoagulation.
Indications for anticoagulant treatment to prevent thromboembolic disease have increased in recent years. INR must be monitored frequently to determine the safest dose and to minimize the risk for thrombotic and haemorrhagic complications. Standard warfarin therapy is associated with rates of major haemorrhage of up to 5-9% annually and recurrent venous thromboembolism of up to 8%. These event rates are dependent of the model of care used to manage warfarin therapy, with better outcomes associated with home testing of the INR which enables patients to monitor their response to warfarin more frequently. INR results must still be 'managed' by communicating the data to the healthcare provider, usually be telephone or fax. In this study we will evaluate a novel method of PST; supervised PST with an internet based expert system, which 'manages' patients on oral anticoagulation by utilizing clinical and laboratory data provided by the patient and dose adjustment and retesting algorithms derived from clinical practice. Patients will be randomized to either 6 months of supervised PST or routine medical care by the AMS. At the end of the 6 month period, each patient will then 'cross over' to the other management regimen and the difference in TTR between the two periods will be compared.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
163
Patients will test their INR at home either biweekly, weekly or every 2 weeks using a CoaguChek point of care meter and communicate with the healthcare provider via an internet based expert system
Patients will attend the AMS for six months and have their INR checked every 4-6 weeks or more frequently, at the discretion of the clinician
Cork University Hospital
Cork, Cork, Ireland
The primary outcome variable used to assess therapeutic efficacy and safety will be the difference in TTR during the six months of AMS management and the six months of PST
Time frame: 1 year
To compare the number of adverse events (haemorrhagic and thromboembolic) using PST and AMS management
Time frame: 1 year
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.