RATIONALE: Diagnostic procedures, such as multifunctional magnetic resonance imaging and CT scans, may help reduce normal tissue damage in patients undergoing radiation therapy for cancer. PURPOSE: This clinical trial is studying how well radiation therapy planning techniques work in reducing damage to normal tissue in women undergoing breast-conserving surgery for ductal breast carcinoma.
OBJECTIVES: * To improve precision of tumor bed localization and definition of clinical target volume, and to reduce normal tissue irradiation in women undergoing partial breast or breast boost radiotherapy. * To test whether post-operative MRI improves the precision of tumor bed delineation after wide-local excision in comparison with the current standard CT scan/clip method. * To determine the impact of tumor position within the excision specimen upon the localization of clinical target volume in relation to the tumor bed. * To compare theoretical non-target tissue exposure from partial breast irradiation planned in the supine and prone (face-down) positions. OUTLINE: Patients undergo planned breast-conservation surgery and placement of titanium clips to the four radial, the deep, and superficial margins of the excision cavity (for localization of tumor bed). Within 2 weeks after surgery, patients undergo supine radiotherapy-planning CT scan as standard analysis. Patients then undergo a radiotherapy-planning CT scan in the prone position. Patients complete a linear analogue questionnaire after both scans designed to assess patient comfort and anxiety in each position. Patients then undergo multifunctional MRI (including dynamic contrast-enhancement MRI and diffusion-weighted MRI) of the ipsilateral breast in the prone position (≥ 3 weeks after surgery). If suspicious lesions ≥ 5 mm are found on MRI, patients are referred for a second-look ultrasound with biopsy (if lesion visible on ultrasound); where suspicious lesions are seen only on MRI, patients undergo MRI-guided biopsy. Lesions \< 5 mm are included in the whole-breast radiotherapy treatment.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
Royal Marsden - Surrey
Sutton, England, United Kingdom
Difference in lung NTDmean (biologically weighted [normalized] mean of total dose to lung normalized to 2 Gy fractions) in supine vs prone positions
Closeness of agreement between MRI-based vs CT scan/clip- based delineation of tumor bed
Closeness of agreement between clinical target volumes (CTVs) defined using uniform margin vs those defined using knowledge of all excision margins
Difference in NTDmean to ipsilateral non-planning target volume (PTV) breast tissue, chest wall muscle, and heart
Difference in mean volume of PTV in supine versus prone positions
Difference in dose homogeneity within PTV in each position
Difference in complexity of beams needed to achieve above dose homogeneity within PTV
Patient comfort with each positioning technique (assessed by questionnaire)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
60