To compare in terms of HbA1c insulin naive patients with Type 2 Diabetes starting with insulin glargine on an algorithm with insulin naive patients starting with insulin glargine on the physician's standard practice. To compare in terms of FBG insulin naïve patients starting with insulin glargine on an algorithm with insulin naïve patients starting with insulin glargine on the physician's standard practice. To compare the percentage of patients achieving HbA1c\< 7% in each treatment group. To compare hypoglycaemic events (minor, severe and nocturnal) between groups. To compare average insulin dose between groups. To compare PRO (patients' reported outcomes) between groups. To compare mean changes in body weight between treatment groups.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
9
For the control group (following the physician's standard practice) a minimum of 4 visits to the clinic is required. Insulin titration and concomitant medications will be done at the discretion of the physician. Strips will be distributed among patients in this group, but there will not be a requirement in frequency or type of SMBG.
In the group following the algorithm, fasting SMBG will be asked 3 times a week until FBG\<100 mg/dl is achieved. Afterwards, 1 fasting SMBG will be asked weekly. Pre-prandial SMBG will be performed at the discretion of the physician. For the group following the algorithm, during the titration period, weekly telephone contacts will be required and a minimum of 4 visits to the clinic.
Sanofi-aventis administrative office Argentina
Buenos Aires, Argentina
Mean difference in HbA1c (efficacy)
Time frame: 6 months
Minor, severe and nocturnal Hypoglycaemic events (safety)
Time frame: from the begining of the treatment up to 5 days after the end of the study
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.