Evaluation of a Flushing ASsessment Tool (FAST) in Subjects Receiving Niacin Extended-release Plus Aspirin

Abbott276 enrolled

Overview

The primary purpose of this study was to evaluate the psychometric characteristics (reliability, validity, and responsiveness) of a Flushing ASsessment Tool (FAST) in subjects receiving niacin extended-release (NER) plus aspirin (ASA) daily for 6 weeks. The FAST is a questionnaire that was developed to provide a detailed assessment of flushing symptoms and their impact in patients receiving niacin therapy. The effect of aspirin on flushing symptoms, as measured by the FAST, was also evaluated.

This study was designed to evaluate the psychometric characteristics of the FAST questionnaire. The FAST is a self-administered questionnaire, completed using a hand-held electronic data capture device (LogPad e-diary). Subjects recorded the start and stop date and time of each flushing event, the presence and severity of individual flushing symptoms (redness, warmth, tingling and/or itching), and an overall assessment of their flushing experience. Evaluation of the psychometric characteristics of the FAST was based on 3 primary data analyses: 1 ) test-retest reliability based on the intraclass correlation coefficient; 2) construct validity based on Spearman correlation coefficients; and 3) responsiveness based on changes in FAST scores. The mean and maximum severity of flushing events, as measured by the FAST, were the primary variables evaluated in each of the 3 data analyses mentioned above. Psychometric analyses were performed blinded to treatment group assignment.

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

QUADRUPLE

Enrollment

276

Conditions

Dyslipidemia

Interventions

Niacin extended-release (NER)DRUG

Tablets administered once daily for 6 weeks; titrated to a maximum dose of 2000 mg

Niacin extended-release (NER) placeboDRUG

Tablets administered once daily for 6 weeks

Aspirin (ASA)DRUG

Tablets (325 mg) administered once daily for 6 weeks

Eligibility

Sex: ALLMin age: 18 Years

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: * Subject must be 18 years of age or older. * If female, subject is either not of childbearing potential, defined as postmenopausal for at least one year or surgically sterile, or is of childbearing potential and must agree to practice birth control for the duration of the study. * Have dyslipidemia as demonstrated by laboratory results. Exclusion Criteria: * Have glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) \>= 9.0%. * Have nephrotic syndrome, dysproteinemias, or severe renal failure (glomerular filtration rate \[GFR\] \< 30 mL/minute, as calculated from creatinine clearance). * Have had unstable angina or an acute myocardial infarction (MI) within three months of the Screening Visit. * Have had severe peripheral artery disease as evidenced by intermittent claudication within three months of the Screening Visit. * Have had uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmias within three months of the Screening Visit. * Have symptomatic heart failure defined as dyspnea at rest or with exertion (mild peripheral edema is not exclusionary). * Have a systolic blood pressure measurement of \> 180 mmHg or a diastolic blood pressure measurement of \> 110 mmHg at the Screening or Baseline Visit * Have active gout or uric acid \>= 11 mg/dL. * Have a history of hepatitis (acute or chronic), obstructive liver disease, or alanine aminotransferase (ALT; serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase \[SGPT\]) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST; serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase \[SGOT\]) values \>= 1.3 times the upper limit of normal (ULN) at the Screening Visit. * Have creatine phosphokinase (CPK) \>= 3 x ULN at the Screening Visit. * Have used an investigational study drug or participated in an investigational study within 30 days of the Screening Visit. * Have a health condition or laboratory abnormality (inclusive of clinically significant laboratory results at Screening Visit), which, in the opinion of the Investigator, may be adversely affected by the procedures or study medications in this study.

Locations (40)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Flushing ASsessment Tool (FAST) Test-retest Reliability--mean Flushing Severity Score

Test-retest reliability of the mean flushing severity score was evaluated. The intraclass correlation coefficient comparing flushing severity scores for Week 1 and Week 2 was examined to determine test-retest reliability. Flushing severity was assessed using the FAST on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the most severe.

Time frame: Week 1 to Week 2

FAST Test-retest Reliability--maximum Flushing Severity Score

Test-retest reliability of the maximum flushing severity score was evaluated. The intraclass correlation coefficient comparing flushing severity scores for Week 1 and Week 2 was examined to determine test-retest reliability. Flushing severity was assessed using the FAST on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the most severe.

Time frame: Week 1 to Week 2

FAST Cross-sectional Construct Validity--mean Flushing Severity Score

The relationship between mean flushing severity and overall flushing troublesomeness was evaluated by examining the Spearman rank-order correlation. Flushing severity was assessed using the FAST on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the most severe. Overall flushing troublesomeness was assessed using the FAST on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the most troublesome.

Time frame: Week 1

FAST Cross-sectional Construct Validity--maximum Flushing Severity Score

The relationship between maximum flushing severity and overall flushing troublesomeness was evaluated by examining the Spearman rank-order correlation. Flushing severity was assessed using the FAST on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the most severe. Overall flushing troublesomeness was assessed using the FAST on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the most troublesome.

Time frame: Week 1

FAST Longitudinal Construct Validity--mean Flushing Severity Score

The relationship between the change in mean flushing severity scores from Week 1 to Week 2, and the subject-rated overall treatment effect scale administered at Week 2, was assessed by examining the Spearman rank-order correlation. Flushing severity was assessed using the FAST on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the most severe. The overall treatment effect was assessed on a scale of 1 (symptoms are worse since study start), 2 (symptoms are about the same since study start), or 3 (symptoms are better since study start).

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov

This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.