The simplicity of use and intuitive function of the McGrath video-laryngoscope suggests it may have a bigger role than as a back-up to conventional direct laryngoscopy and could possibly be the first-line laryngoscope for situations where difficult intubations are more likely or more hazardous. The incidence of difficult or failed intubation for an individual anaesthetist is related to their experience, decreasing as experience increases. The purpose of this trial is to evaluate the McGrath laryngoscope when used by relatively inexperienced anaesthetists, who are those most likely to encounter difficulties. The null hypotheses to be tested is that there is no difference between the Macintosh and McGrath laryngoscope in terms of ease and success in intubation.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
120
Tracheal intubation, using Mcgrath video-laryngoscope
Tracheal intubation using Macintosh Laryngoscope
Aberdeen Royal Hospitals, NHS Grampian
Aberdeen, UK, United Kingdom
Intubation Time
Time from anaesthetist picking up laryngoscope until 1st upward capnograph deflection after intubation
Time frame: At intubation
Difference in Learning to Use the Scopes
Is there a difference between trainee anaesthetists in learning to use the scopes
Time frame: At analysis
Quality of View of the Vocal Cords
Time frame: At analysis
Number of Attempts to Secure Successful Intubation
Is there a difference in the number of attempts required to secure successful intubation ?
Time frame: At analysis
Incidence of Initial Oesophageal Intubation
Time frame: At analysis
Number of Intubations Taking More Than 70 Seconds
Time frame: At Analysis
Incidence of Low Arterial Saturation During Intubation
Time frame: At analysis
Incidence of Visible Trauma to the Airway
Time frame: At analysis
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.