Gabapentin and pregabalin are treatments for some types of neuropathic pain, including postherpetic neuralgia (PHN). However, these treatments usually need to be taken 3 times a day for effective pain control. The purpose of this study is to determine whether a new gabapentin tablet, which only needs to be taken once a day, is safe and effective for the treatment of postherpetic neuralgia.
The primary study objective is to assess the relative efficacy of G-ER dosed once daily (1800 mg following the evening meal), versus placebo in reducing the mean daily pain score from the baseline week to the end of the efficacy treatment period (Treatment Week 10) in patients with PHN. Secondary efficacy measures will include changes from baseline in mean weekly sleep interference scores, Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), the Neuropathic Pain Scale (NPS), Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC), and Investigator-Rated Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
452
Once-Daily; 300 mg and 600 mg tablets
Once daily; 300 mg and 600 mg tablets
Mean Change in Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF) Average Daily Pain Score
Average daily pain scored on 11-point numerical rating scale (where 0 = no pain, 10 = worst possible pain). Results presented as least squares (LS) mean change in baseline observation carried forward (BOCF) average daily pain score from baseline to the final week of efficacy treatment period (Week 10).
Time frame: 10 weeks
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
Patient self-assessment of how much pain had changed at end of treatment period (Week 10) compared to pain at baseline; scored on 7-point numerical rating scale (where 1 = very much improved, 7 = very much worse). Results presented as number of participants categorized at end of treatment (Week 10) as "very much improved" (score = 1) or "much improved" (score = 2).
Time frame: 10 weeks
Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC)
Investigator assessment of patient's overall PHN symptoms at end of treatment period (Week 10) compared to overall PHN symptoms at baseline; scored on 7-point numerical rating scale (where 1 = very much improved, 7 = very much worse). Results presented as number of participants categorized at end of treatment (Week 10) as "very much improved" (score = 1) or "much improved" (score = 2).
Time frame: 10 weeks
Average Daily Sleep Interference Score
Assessed on 11-point numeric rating scale (where 0 = pain does not interfere with sleep, 10 = pain completely interferes with sleep); evaluated from daily sleep entry in electronic diary. Results presented as least squares (LS) mean change in baseline observation carried forward (BOCF) average daily sleep interference score from baseline to final week of treatment period (Week 10).
Time frame: 10 weeks
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Unnamed facility
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Unnamed facility
Tuscaloosa, Alabama, United States
Unnamed facility
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Unnamed facility
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
Unnamed facility
Lancaster, California, United States
Unnamed facility
Los Angeles, California, United States
Unnamed facility
Pismo Beach, California, United States
Unnamed facility
Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States
Unnamed facility
Pueblo, Colorado, United States
Unnamed facility
Daytona Beach, Florida, United States
...and 29 more locations