COMPASS-HF was a prospective, two-arm, randomized (1:1), multi-center, parallel controlled study. The purpose of the randomized study was to test the safety of an implantable hemodynamic monitor (IHM) and pressure sensor lead. The premise of this study was to compare the effectiveness of a novel heart failure management strategy based on information obtained from the IHM system in reducing heart failure morbidity compared to a strategy based on standard medical care alone.
COMPASS-HF was a prospective, two-arm, randomized (1:1), multi-center, parallel controlled study. The purpose of the randomized study was to test the safety of an implantable hemodynamic monitor (IHM) and pressure sensor lead. The premise of this study was to compare the effectiveness of a novel heart failure management strategy based on information obtained from the IHM system in reducing heart failure morbidity compared to a strategy based on standard medical care alone. After baseline evaluation and verification that entrance criteria were met, all subjects were implanted with a Chronicle IHM and pressure sensor lead. Following successful implantation, subjects were randomized to either the CHRONICLE group or CONTROL group. Subjects randomized to the CHRONICLE group were managed using Chronicle, specifically trended RV and estimated PA pressure, heart rate and activity data, whereas subjects randomized to the CONTROL group were treated conventionally without the use of the Chronicle data. In the case that implantation was not successful, subjects were exited from the study if no procedure related adverse events were identified; procedure related adverse events were followed through to resolution before the subject were withdrawn from the study. Subjects remained randomized until their six month clinic visit had been completed. Following the subject's six month visit, clinicians were granted access to the CONTROL subject's trended Chronicle data on the Chronicle website, and subjects were seen in the clinic for a protocol-required visit every six months until exit from the study.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
Surgical implantation of chronic ambulatory implantable hemodynamic monitoring (IHM) device and intracardiac pressure sensing lead. The implantable hemodynamic monitoring device captures intracardiac hemodynamic information about the patient including trended right ventricular (RV) and estimated pulmonary arterial (PA) pressures, heart rate and activity data. The IHM device does not provide therapy, but rather provides intracardiac diagnostic information about the patient which the physician can utilize to manage the patient and the patients heart failure.
Surgical implantation of chronic ambulatory implantable hemodynamic monitoring (IHM) device and intracardiac pressure sensing lead, but physician and patient access to the intracardiac information provided by the device is restricted until the end of the randomized period of the study, at 6 months. Patients and patients heart failure are managed conventionally per standard of care.
Safety as Measured by the Percentage of Participants Free From System Related Complications Through 6 Months.
A Chronicle IHM system-related complication was defined as any system-related adverse event that occurred during the clinical investigation which is (1) treated with invasive means (including intravenous drug therapy), (2) results in death, (3) results in the explant of any Chronicle IHM component, and/or (4) causes permanent loss of significant function of the implanted system. Safety is defined as ≥ 80% of participants experiencing freedom from device related complications through 6 months.
Time frame: Within 6 months post-implant
Safety as Measured by the Percentage of Participants Free From Implantable Hemodynamic Monitor Pressure Related Sensor Lead Failures Through 6 Months.
A pressure sensor failure was defined as a recognizable, abrupt, non-physiologic shift in pressure parameters. Safety is defined as ≥ 90% of participants free from pressure sensor lead failure through 6 months.
Time frame: Within 6 months post-implant
Rate of Heart Failure-related Hospital Equivalents.
Hospital equivalents (HE) were defined to include the following events: 1. Heart failure-related hospital admissions for 24 hours or longer 2. Heart failure-related emergency department visits and necessitates invasive treatment (e.g. IV diuretic administration). 3. Heart failure-related urgent visits and necessitates invasive treatment (e.g. IV diuretic administration).
Time frame: 6 Months post-implant
Health Care Utilization
Characterize total health care utilization, the total number of all-cause hospitalization, emergency department, and urgent care visits.
Time frame: 6 Months post-implant
Days Hospitalization Free
The number of days alive outside the hospital was calculated as the number of days of randomized follow-up minus the number of days hospitalized during the randomized follow-up period.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
SINGLE
Enrollment
277
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Loma Linda University Medical Center
Loma Linda, California, United States
UCLA Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, United States
University of Southern California
Los Angeles, California, United States
University of Florida - Shands
Gainesville, Florida, United States
Crawford LongHospital
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Prairie Heart Institute
Springfield, Illinois, United States
Parkview Memorial Hospital
Fort Wayne, Indiana, United States
New England Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
St. Paul Heart
Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States
...and 18 more locations
Time frame: 6 Months post-implant
Clinical Composite Response of Either "Worsened", "Improved", or "Unchanged"
Worsened, Improved and Unchanged were defined as follows: Worsened: Patient died, hospitalized for worsening heart failure, worsened NYHA Class Improved: Patient improved in NYHA Class Unchanged: Patient was neither improved nor worsened.
Time frame: 6 Months post-implant
Quality of Life Measured by the Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire
Quality of life was measured by the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure (MLHF), a questionnaire with 21 questions and scored on a scale from 0 (good quality of life) to 105 (low quality of life). Change in quality of life is defined as change from baseline to month 6. A participant must have completed a quality of life survey at the baseline visit and month 6 visit to be included in the analysis.
Time frame: 6 Months post-implant
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classifications were defined as follows: Class I - Patients with cardiac disease but without resulting limitation of physical activity. Ordinary physical activity does not cause undue fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea, or angina. Class II - Patients with cardiac disease resulting in slight limitation of physical activity. They are comfortable at rest. Ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea, or angina. Class III - Patients with cardiac disease resulting in marked limitation of physical activity. They are comfortable at rest. Less than ordinary activity causes fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea, or angina. Class IV - Patients with cardiac disease resulting in inability to carry on any physical activity without discomfort. Symptoms of heart failure or the anginal syndrome may be present even at rest. If any physical activity is undertaken, discomfort is increased.
Time frame: 6 Months post-implant
Distance Walked During a Six Minute Hall Walk
Patients completed six minute hall walk at baseline and 6 months. Outcome is change in hall walk distance from baseline to 6 months.
Time frame: 6 Months post-implant