In case of sinus node dysfunction, it is often necessary to choose the safer option provided by a DDD pacemaker even though the most appropriate mode of pacing is AAI mode. In addition to saving energy, the latter mode allows spontaneous ventricular activation, the haemodynamic consequences of which are, in most cases, better than those obtained with dual chamber pacing. Recent studies as the MOST study suggest also that ventricular desynchronization imposed by right ventricular apical pacing even when AV synchrony is preserved increases the risk of atrial fibrillation in patients with SND. Similar results were already given by anterior studies (PIPAF) which, taking into account the percentage of ventricular pacing, suggested that AF prevention algorithm in combination with a preserved native conduction are efficient in reducing AF burden. However, current practice is to implant a dual chamber pacemaker to prevent the risk of atrioventricular block (AVB) even if DDDR pacing with a fixed long AV delay was found inefficient in reducing ventricular pacing and was associated with a high risk of arrhythmias. The Symphony 2550 cardiac pacemaker offers pacing modes that automatically switch from AAI(R) mode to DDD(R) or DDI(R) in event of severe atrioventricular conduction disorder, irrespective of whether or not these are accompanied by an atrial arrhythmia, returning spontaneously to AAI(R) mode as soon as the spontaneous AV conduction has resumed. These 2 particular modes are called the AAI SafeR and DDD/AMC (R) mode. The main differences between both modes are that (i) AAI SafeR does not trigger any AV Delay after a sensed or paced atrial event which allows long PR intervals or even limited ventricular pauses with no switch to DDD(R), while (ii) DDD/AMC (R) is able to optimize AV Delay after switching to DDD(R) according to measured spontaneous conduction times and to provide an acceleration in case of vaso-vagal syndrome. This pacing mode has previously been assessed in clinical studies. This study intends to demonstrate that the automatic modes switching significantly reduce the percentage of ventricular pacing in patients implanted with a spontaneous AV conduction and reduce the occurrence of atrial arrhythmias, on a mid-term follow-up period, in comparison to standard DDD pacing with long AVDelay.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
622
Onze lieve Vrouw ziekenhuis
Aalst, Belgium
Clinique Louis Caty
Baudour, Belgium
Hôpital universitaire Brugmann
Brussels, Belgium
Europa ziekenhuis
Campus Saint Elisabeth Uccle, Belgium
Heiling Hart van Jezus
Moen, Belgium
Hôpital Vésale (univ.)
mean percentage of ventricular pacing between the randomized branches on a two-months period (M3 visit)
Time frame: 2 months
mean percentage of ventricular pacing between the studied groups during the whole study (up to 1 year).
Time frame: 12 months
percentage of ventricular pacing two month after randomization versus the percentage reported at the end of the first month follow-up in AAIsafeR mode.
Time frame: 12 months
AF burden relatively to the branch of the protocol
Time frame: 12 months
evolution of conduction disturbances by documentings nature, number and duration of ario-ventricular blocks.
Time frame: 12 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Montigny-le-Tilleul, Belgium
CHU - Tivoli
Tivoli, Belgium
Centre Hospitalier
Aix-en-Provence, France
CH Albi
Albi, France
CHU d'Angers
Angers, France
...and 57 more locations