RATIONALE: An interactive computer program may be more effective than a brochure in increasing colorectal cancer screening among African Americans. PURPOSE: This randomized clinical trial is studying an interactive computer program to see how well it works compared with a brochure in increasing colorectal cancer screening among African Americans.
OBJECTIVES: * Compare rates of participation in fecal occult blood testing and endoscopic screening (colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy) among African-Americans who receive an interactive computer intervention (ICI) versus a non-tailored colorectal cancer screening brochure. * Examine mediators and moderators of intervention effectiveness as depicted in the conceptual model. OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Participants are stratified according to site, age (≤ 65 years old vs \> 65 years old) and gender. Participants are randomized to one of two arms. * Arm I (non-tailored colorectal cancer screening brochure): Participants undergo a baseline interview via telephone and receive a colorectal cancer screening brochure in the clinic prior to visit with healthcare provider. Participants then undergo telephone interviews at 1 week, 6 months, and 15 months. * Arm II (interactive computer intervention \[ICI\]): Participants undergo a baseline interview via telephone and complete an ICI in the clinic prior to visit with healthcare provider. Participants then undergo telephone interviews at 1 week, 6 months, and 15 months.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
693
Patients receive written educational material about colorectal cancer and prompting to talk to their doctor about getting tested.
Indiana University School of Nursing
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
Self-reported colorectal cancer (CRC) screening adherence with medical record verification of screening test completion
Time frame: 6 and 15 months post-intervention
Self-reported CRC discussion and screening test recommendation from provider on intervention/clinic visit date
Discussion of Fecal Occult Blood Test (FOBT), colonoscopy, and sigmoidoscopy is assessed. Participants report on whether or not an FOBT kit was given to them during this visit. Additionally, participants report on whether or not someone in the doctor's office made an appointment for a colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy.
Time frame: 1 week post-intervention
Provider documentation of CRC discussion and screening test recommendation on intervention/clinic visit date
Medical record documentation of discussion of FOBT, providing participant with an FOBT kit, discussion and/or ordering a colonoscopy, and discussion and/or ordering a sigmoidoscopy is assessed.
Time frame: 1 week post-intervention
Self-reported CRC health beliefs
Changes in perceived risk, benefits to screening, barriers to screening, and self-efficacy for CRC screening are assessed.
Time frame: Pre-intervention (baseline),1 week post-intervention, and 6 months post-intervention
Self-reported stage of CRC screening test adoption
For FOBT, colonoscopy, and sigmoidoscopy, stage of adoption measured as either precontemplation, contemplation, preparation, action, or maintenance.
Time frame: Pre-intervention (baseline),1 week post-intervention, 6 months post-intervention, and 15 months post-intervention
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.