A RCT study to compare traditional colporrhaphy versus polypropylene mesh in treatment of the anterior vaginal wall prolapse.
Seventy patients with greater anterior vaginal prolapse, whit stress incontinence or not, were randomly assigned to either colporrhaphy or polypropylene mesh repair( NAZCA TC™ POP REPAIR SYSTEM) . The primary outcome was recurrent anterior vaginal prolapse, and secondary outcomes were effects on quality of life and sexual symptom scores, operative time, length of hospitalization, and adverse events.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
70
seventy patients with greater anterior vaginal prolapse, whit stress incontinence or not, were randomly assigned to either colporrhaphy or polypropylene mesh repair (NAZCA TC™ POP REPAIR SYSTEM ) . The primary outcome was recurrent anterior vaginal prolapse, and secondary outcomes were effects on quality of life and sexual symptom scores, operative time, blood loss, length of hospitalization, and adverse events.
Women 50 years and older with greater anterior vaginal prolapse,whit stress incontinence or not, requiring surgical correction .
Sao Paulo Hospital
São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
The primary outcome measure is recurrent anterior vaginal prolapse
Time frame: 1 year
Secondary outcomes are, first, operative time (from first incision to closure of last incision), blood loss (preoperative minus postoperative day one hemoglobin), length of hospitalization, adverse events, PQol , FSFI and Dyspareunia .
Time frame: 1 year
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Women 50 years and older with greater anterior vaginal prolapse,whit stress incontinence or not requiring surgical correction were eligible for participation.