The aim of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes of root coverage procedures, using coronally advanced flap in combination with acellular dermal matrix with or without enamel matrix derivatives .
coverage of gingival recession defects has been considered as a matter of interest for dental practitioners.subjects with a paired gingival recession defect will be selected from the patients who sought dental treatment at our department.Random allocation of the treatment sites to test (CAF+ EMD+ADM) and control (CAF + ADM) groups will be performed by a person who is external to the study and using a computerized selection of random numbers for allocation of the study groups.The parameters of the study are as following items: probing depth( PD), clinical attachment level (CAL), width of keratinized tissue (WKT), recession depth from cemento- enamel junction (RD), recession width (RW), distance between mucogingival junction and the stent (MGJ), Plaque (PI) and gingival (GI) indices and root coverage percentage (RC) and the patients will be followed up for 6 months.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
18
using coronally advanced flap (CAF) in combination with acellular dermal matrix (ADM) with enamel matrix derivatives (EMD).
using coronally advanced flap (CAF) in combination with acellular dermal matrix (ADM) without enamel matrix derivatives (EMD) for root coverage procedures.
Faculty of Dentistry- Tabriz University of Medical Sciences
Tabriz, East Azerbaijan Province, Iran
the percentage of root coverage
Time frame: at baseline, 2 and 6 months after treatment.
clinical attachment level, width of keratinized gingiva ant the position of mucco-gingival junction following root coverage procedures
Time frame: 6 months after treatment
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.