The purpose of this study is to compare two different marketed PICC (peripherally inserted central catheter) designs. Clotting rates, procedural bleeding and ease of catheter insertion will be compared. It is hypothesized that the non-tapered design has a lower clotting rate and is easier to place than the tapered design. Bleeding rates are expected to be about the same.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
339
Standard peripheral central catheter placement in the Brachial, Basilic or Cephalic veins
Standard peripheral central catheter placement in the Brachial, Basilic or Cephalic veins
Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Evidence of PICC-related Venous Thrombosis
Number participants with vein thrombosis
Time frame: 28 days, PICC removal or hospital discharge
Post-operative Bleeding
Post-operative bleeding
Time frame: Day 1
Symptomatic PICC-related Venous Thrombosis
Symptomatic PICC-related venous thrombosis
Time frame: Procedure through 28 days
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.