The purpose of this study is to research a polyester polyethylene terephthalate (PET) implant for the treatment of external nasal valve collapse (NVC). NVC is a condition which causes narrowness and weakness in the nostril which results in nasal obstruction. Implants will be placed in the affected nostril(s). The implants are intended to restore the shape and stabilize the nasal wall to prevent nasal valve collapse and improve the symptoms associated with nasal obstruction.
The effects of PET implants on external NVC and cosmetic contour deformity will be evaluated in an open-label, prospective study. Subjects for this clinical study will be recruited and screened from clinic office visits and patient records at each principal investigator's site as well as through an investigational review board (IRB)-approved general advertisement. Those patients that continue to qualify after either screening process will be seen and evaluated by one of the clinical investigators prior to enrollment in the study. Subjects must meet criteria for the diagnosis of external nasal valve collapse as a stand alone abnormality (i.e., symptoms of obstruction cannot be caused primarily by other factors). Other contributing factors to the nasal obstruction must be ruled out and/or treated, without relief before enrollment in this study. No other surgeries or procedures will be allowed during the study that could influence the evaluation of implants on the treatment of nasal valve collapse and cosmetic contour deformity. All subjects will be required to sign an IRB approved informed consent prior to entry into the study. After meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria and completing the pre-implant evaluations, subjects will be scheduled for treatment with the polyethylene terephthalate implants. The implant procedure will be performed by facial plastic physicians. All investigative sites will be required to undergo training to standardize the methodology of implant technique and administration of evaluation techniques (questionnaires, scales, photographic assessments, etc.). Target sample size for the study will be 72 subjects. Follow up evaluations for all outcome measures will occur at 1, 6, and 12 weeks after implantation. Long-term follow-up for adverse events will be conducted at 11 months or later after implantation.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
45
Three polyester (PET) implants will be implanted in each side of the nose affected by external NVC. See the detailed description for information about the implant procedure.
UC Davis Medical Center
Sacramento, California, United States
Premier Image Cosmetic & Laser
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
DuPage Medical Group, Ltd
Downers Grove, Illinois, United States
Ear, Nose, & Throat Physicians
Sterling Heights, Michigan, United States
Functional Improvement
Functional improvement was defined as a subject who achieves both 1) an improvement in the physical condition of the collapsed nasal valve as evidenced by an increase of \>= 10% in the change in volume during inspiration as measured by Vectra 3D photography from baseline to 12 weeks post-procedure; and 2) a reduction of at least 30% in the symptoms of nasal obstruction as measured by the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation Scale (NOSE) scale (5 questions with 0-4 scale from "Not a problem" to "Severe problem," possible score 0-100 via raw score × 5) from baseline to 12 weeks post-procedure.
Time frame: 12 weeks after implantation
Cosmetic Improvement
An independent clinician will review Vectra 3D photographs of each subject at baseline and at 12 weeks post-procedure to assess physical appearance of the external nasal wall. The clinician will be asked to determine which photographs are pre-treatment and which are post-treatment in the correct order. The clinician will then rate the photograph chosen as post-treatment using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS; relative scale from "Worse" to "Very much improved"). If the post-treatment photograph was not correctly identified, that procedure will receive a "worse" on the rating scale.
Time frame: 12 weeks after implantation
Safety
Evaluate complications and adverse events. Events are presented descriptively with no statistical analysis.
Time frame: During 12-week original study and at long-term follow-up of 11 months or longer
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
HealthPartners Specialty Clinic/Regions Hospital
Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States