The purpose of this study is to determine the optimal outpatient treatment strategy of uncomplicated skin and soft tissue infection (SSTI) in areas of the United States where the prevalence of Community-Acquired Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus (S.) aureus (CA-MRSA) is high. Infection with the S. aureus bacteria that is resistant to antibiotics is a cause of SSTIs. Three oral antibiotics will be tested for off patent treatment. Patients will receive Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX), placebo (substance containing no medication), clindamycin, or cephalexin or some combination of these. The study population will include 2,235 volunteers, children 13 years of age and over and adults presenting to 5 large urban Emergency Departments. Therapy for acute uncomplicated SSTIs, including abscess, infected wound, and cellulitis will start on the day of enrollment. Participants may be involved in study related procedures for about 9 weeks.
Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) has recently emerged as a cause of skin and soft-tissue infection (SSTI). In the current era of increasing CA-MRSA infections, the outpatient management of SSTIs has not been well studied. This will be a clinical trial to evaluate oral off-patent antibiotics for outpatient treatment of patients with any of the 3 main types of acute uncomplicated SSTI, i.e., abscesses, infected wounds, and cellulitis. Upon enrollment, subjects will be stratified by type of infection, and then randomized to various treatments. Subjects with an acute uncomplicated cutaneous abscess receiving incision and drainage (I\&D) will be treated with Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX) or placebo to determine whether the addition of an antibiotic with activity against CA-MRSA is more clinically efficacious than I\&D alone. Subjects with an acute wound infection will be treated with TMP/SMX or clindamycin to determine if clindamycin, an antibiotic with activity against CA-MRSA, methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA), and streptococci is more clinically efficacious than TMP/SMX, an antibiotic with activity against CA-MRSA and MSSA. Subjects with acute cellulitis will be treated with cephalexin/TMP/SMX or cephalexin/placebo to determine if cephalexin/TMP/SMX is more clinically efficacious than cephalexin alone. The primary objectives for each type of SSTI studied are to compare the cure rates in the per protocol (PP) population. Secondary objectives provide additional means of assessment for the clinical efficacy of the employed interventions and resolution of the infection and include describing microbiological cure, change in the dimension of erythema, composite cure, surgical procedures, invasive and recurrent infections, infections in household contacts, and time to normal activity and until analgesics are no longer used at various times in the PP/ modified intent-to-treat (mITT) populations. This is a multi-center, randomized, double-blind clinical trial in which subjects will be stratified by the type of infection and then randomized to various 7-day oral antibiotic treatments, including placebo-controlled and comparative designs. The study population will include children 13 years of age and over and adults, who weigh greater than or equal to 40 kg presenting to 5 large urban emergency departments. Therapy will start on the day of enrollment. Subjects will be evaluated upon enrollment, at 2-3 days after enrollment (OTV), at 1-3 days after the end-of-therapy (EOT), at 7-14 days after the end-of-therapy (TOC), and at 6-8 weeks after the end-of-therapy (EFV).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
2,265
500 mg, four times per day.
300 mg, four times per day.
Placebo tablet administered orally.
4 single strength Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX), 80 mg/400 mg each, twice per day.
Maricopa Medical Center - Emergency Medicine
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
University of California Los Angeles - Olive View Medical Center
Sylmar, California, United States
Johns Hopkins University at Mount Washington - Emergency Medicine
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Truman Medical Center - Hospital Hill
Kansas City, Missouri, United States
Temple University Hospital
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Number of Participants With Clinical Cure as of the Test-of-Cure (TOC) Visit in the Per Protocol Population
Clinical cure at TOC was defined as no failure on any previous visit up through the TOC, absence of fever, and resolution or minimal presence of all the following signs and symptoms from baseline based on clinician assessment of erythema, swelling, and tenderness. A participant would have been a clinical failure at the On Therapy (OTV) visit with presence of fever attributable to the infection being studied, increase in erythema by 25% or more, or worsening of both swelling and tenderness based on clinical assessment. A participant would have been a clinical failure at the End of Therapy (EOT) visit with presence of fever attributable to the infection being studied, increase or no improvement in erythema, or no improvement in either swelling or tenderness based on clinical assessment.
Time frame: Days 14-21
Number of Participants With Clinical Cure as of the TOC Visit in the Intent to Treat Population
Clinical cure at TOC was defined as no failure on any previous visit up through the TOC, absence of fever, and resolution or minimal presence of all the following signs and symptoms from baseline based on clinician assessment of erythema, swelling, and tenderness. A participant would have been a clinical failure at the On Therapy (OTV) visit with presence of fever attributable to the infection being studied, increase in erythema by 25% or more, or worsening of both swelling and tenderness based on clinical assessment. A participant would have been a clinical failure at the End of Therapy (EOT) visit with presence of fever attributable to the infection being studied, increase or no improvement in erythema, or no improvement in either swelling or tenderness based on clinical assessment.
Time frame: Days 14-21
Number of Participants With Reduction in Erythema Dimensions by 5% Intervals at the On-therapy Visit in the Per Protocol Population
The area of erythema was measured in square centimeters at baseline and at the on-therapy visit. For each subject, the change in area was calculated as the area at on-therapy subtracted from the area at baseline. The change in area was then divided by the original area to determine the proportional change. Participants were then categorized by reductions in 5% intervals, with participants whose erythema did not change or increased categorized as no reduction.
Time frame: Day 1 to Day 3-4
Number of Participants With Reduction in Erythema Dimensions by 5% Intervals at the On-therapy Visit in the Intent to Treat Population
The area of erythema was measured in square centimeters at baseline and at the on-therapy visit. For each subject, the change in area was calculated as the area at on-therapy subtracted from the area at baseline. The change in area was then divided by the original area to determine the proportional change. Participants were then categorized by reductions in 5% intervals, with participants whose erythema did not change or increased categorized as no reduction.
Time frame: Day 1 to Day 3-4
Number of Participants With Reduction in Erythema Dimensions by 5% Intervals at the End-of-therapy Visit in the Per Protocol Population
The area of erythema was measured in square centimeters at baseline and at the end-of-therapy visit. For each subject, the change in area was calculated as the area at end-of-therapy subtracted from the area at baseline. The change in area was then divided by the original area to determine the proportional change. Participants were then categorized by reductions in 5% intervals, with participants whose erythema did not change or increased categorized as no reduction.
Time frame: Day 1 to Day 8-10
Number of Participants With Reduction in Erythema Dimensions by 5% Intervals at the End-of-therapy Visit in the Intent to Treat Population
The area of erythema was measured in square centimeters at baseline and at the end-of-therapy visit. For each subject, the change in area was calculated as the area at end-of-therapy subtracted from the area at baseline. The change in area was then divided by the original area to determine the proportional change. Participants were then categorized by reductions in 5% intervals, with participants whose erythema did not change or increased categorized as no reduction.
Time frame: Day 1 to Day 8-10
Number of Participants With Reduction in Erythema Dimensions by 5% Intervals at the TOC Visit in the Per Protocol Population
The area of erythema was measured in square centimeters at baseline and at the TOC visit. For each subject, the change in area was calculated as the area at TOC subtracted from the area at baseline. The change in area was then divided by the original area to determine the proportional change. Participants were then categorized by reductions in 5% intervals, with participants whose erythema did not change or increased categorized as no reduction.
Time frame: Day 1 to Day 14-21
Number of Participants With Reduction in Erythema Dimensions by 5% Intervals at the TOC Visit in the Intent to Treat Population
The area of erythema was measured in square centimeters at baseline and at the TOC visit. For each subject, the change in area was calculated as the area at TOC subtracted from the area at baseline. The change in area was then divided by the original area to determine the proportional change. Participants were then categorized by reductions in 5% intervals, with participants whose erythema did not change or increased categorized as no reduction.
Time frame: Day 1 to Day 14-21
Number of Participants by Composite Clinical Outcome at the TOC Visit in the Per Protocol Population
Participants were categorized as composite clinical cure if they had resolution of all symptoms/signs of infection, or improvement to such an extent that no additional antibiotic therapy and/or surgical procedures were necessary. Participants were categorized as composite clinical failure if they had lack of resolution of all signs and symptoms of infection to such an extent that further antibiotic therapy and/or surgical procedures were necessary.
Time frame: Day 14-21
Number of Participants With Each Microbiological Outcome at the TOC Visit in the Per Protocol Population
Participants were categorized for the microbiological outcome with Presumed eradication if they were not deemed a clinical failure through TOC. Those who were deemed a clinical failure through the TOC were classified as one of the following: Persistence=persistent growth of a pre-therapy pathogen; New infection=growth of a new pathogen and eradication of initial pathogen; Super-infection=growth of a new pathogen in addition to persistent growth of pre-therapy pathogen; Unclassified=no specimen for culture or growth of a pathogen in subsequent culture specimen of cellulitis participants, or for whom initial culture specimens were negative or were not obtained for infected wound and abscess participants; or Indeterminate=not meeting any one of the above microbiologic outcome criteria.
Time frame: Day 14-21
Number of Participants Requiring Surgical Intervention Through the TOC Visit in the Per Protocol Population
All surgical procedures such as incision and drainage (I\&D) and debridement that were related to the current infection under study or significant to the health of the subject, except for the initial I\&D of an abscess for participants in the abscess or infected wound arms, were recorded. Participants who required a surgical intervention between the initial enrollment (excluding the initial I\&D as applicable) and the test-of-cure visit are summarized.
Time frame: Day 1 through Day 14-21
Number of Participants Requiring Surgical Intervention Through the TOC Visit in the Intent to Treat Population
All surgical procedures such as incision and drainage (I\&D) and debridement that were related to the current infection under study or significant to the health of the subject, except for the initial I\&D of an abscess for participants in the abscess or infected wound arms, were recorded. Participants who required a surgical intervention between the initial enrollment (excluding the initial I\&D as applicable) and the test-of-cure visit are summarized.
Time frame: Day 1 through Day 14-21
Number of Participants Requiring Surgical Intervention Through the Extended Follow-up Visit (EFV) in the Per Protocol Population
All surgical procedures such as incision and drainage (I\&D) and debridement that were related to the current infection under study or significant to the health of the subject, except for the initial I\&D of an abscess for participants in the abscess or infected wound arms, were recorded. Participants who required a surgical intervention between the initial enrollment (excluding the initial I\&D as applicable) and the extended follow-up visit are summarized.
Time frame: Day 1 through Day 49-63
Number of Participants Requiring Surgical Intervention Through the Extended Follow-up Visit (EFV) in the Intent to Treat Population
All surgical procedures such as incision and drainage (I\&D) and debridement that were related to the current infection under study or significant to the health of the subject, except for the initial I\&D of an abscess for participants in the abscess or infected wound arms, were recorded. Participants who required a surgical intervention between the initial enrollment (excluding the initial I\&D as applicable) and the extended follow-up visit are summarized.
Time frame: Day 1 through Day 49-63
Number of Participants With Development of an Invasive Infection Through the TOC Visit in the Per Protocol Population
Participants were evaluated for invasive infection, which included, but was not limited to, findings of severe sepsis/septic shock, endocarditis, pneumonia, necrotizing soft tissue, osteomyelitis, and bacteremia. A positive response to at least one finding was considered invasive infection for this outcome measure.
Time frame: Day 1 through Day 14-21
Number of Participants With Development of an Invasive Infection Through the TOC Visit in the Intent to Treat Population
Participants were evaluated for invasive infection, which included, but was not limited to, findings of severe sepsis/septic shock, endocarditis, pneumonia, necrotizing soft tissue, osteomyelitis, and bacteremia. A positive response to at least one finding was considered invasive infection for this outcome measure.
Time frame: Day 1 through Day 14-21
Number of Participants With Development of an Invasive Infection Through the EFV Visit in the Per Protocol Population
Participants were evaluated for invasive infection, which included, but was not limited to, findings of severe sepsis/septic shock, endocarditis, pneumonia, necrotizing soft tissue, osteomyelitis, and bacteremia. A positive response to at least one finding was considered invasive infection for this outcome measure.
Time frame: Day 1 through Day 49-63
Number of Participants With Development of an Invasive Infection Through the EFV Visit in the Intent to Treat Population
Participants were evaluated for invasive infection, which included, but was not limited to, findings of severe sepsis/septic shock, endocarditis, pneumonia, necrotizing soft tissue, osteomyelitis, and bacteremia. A positive response to at least one finding was considered invasive infection for this outcome measure.
Time frame: Day 1 through Day 49-63
Number of Participants Who Developed a Recurrent Infection at the Original Infection Site Through the TOC Visit in the Per Protocol Population
Participants were evaluated for the development of a recurrent, or repeat, infection at the original infection site. Participants who were reported to have developed a recurrent infection though the test-of-cure visit are summarized.
Time frame: Day 1 through Day 14-21
Number of Participants Who Developed a Recurrent Infection at the Original Infection Site Through the TOC Visit in the Intent to Treat Population
Participants were evaluated for the development of a recurrent, or repeat, infection at the original infection site. Participants who were reported to have developed a recurrent infection though the test-of-cure visit are summarized.
Time frame: Day 1 through Day 14-21
Number of Participants Who Developed a Recurrent Infection at the Original Infection Site Through the EFV Visit in the Per Protocol Population
Participants were evaluated for the development of a recurrent, or repeat, infection at the original infection site. Participants who were reported to have developed a recurrent infection though the extended follow-up visit are summarized.
Time frame: Day 1 through Day 49-63
Number of Participants Who Developed a Recurrent Infection at the Original Infection Site Through the EFV Visit in the Intent to Treat Population
Participants were evaluated for the development of a recurrent, or repeat, infection at the original infection site. Participants who were reported to have developed a recurrent infection though the extended follow-up visit are summarized.
Time frame: Day 1 through Day 49-63
Number of Participants With Infections in Household Contacts Through the TOC Visit in the Per Protocol Population
At each follow-up visit, participants were asked about history of skin infections in household members (e.g., similar skin infection in a family member). This outcome measure relied solely on participant reporting. Participants who reported having a family member with a similar infection though the test-of-cure visit are summarized.
Time frame: Day 1 through Day 14-21
Number of Participants With Infections in Household Contacts Through the TOC Visit in the Intent to Treat Population
At each follow-up visit, participants were asked about history of skin infections in household members (e.g., similar skin infection in a family member). This outcome measure relied solely on participant reporting. Participants who reported having a family member with a similar infection though the test-of-cure visit are summarized.
Time frame: Day 1 through Day 14-21
Number of Participants With Infections in Household Contacts Through the EFV Visit in the Per Protocol Population
At each follow-up visit, participants were asked about history of skin infections in household members (e.g., similar skin infection in a family member). This outcome measure relied solely on participant reporting. Participants who reported having a family member with a similar infection though the extended follow-up visit are summarized.
Time frame: Day 1 through Day 49-63
Number of Participants With Infections in Household Contacts Through the EFV Visit in the Intent to Treat Population
At each follow-up visit, participants were asked about history of skin infections in household members (e.g., similar skin infection in a family member). This outcome measure relied solely on participant reporting. Participants who reported having a family member with a similar infection though the extended follow-up visit are summarized.
Time frame: Day 1 through Day 49-63
Number of Participants With Adverse Events Considered Associated With the Study Product by MedDRA System Organ Class
All adverse events were recorded through the test of cure visit; serious adverse events and new and recurrent skin infections were recorded though the extended follow-up visit. All AEs were assessed for association with the study product by a clinician and were considered associated with study product if the event was temporally related to the administration of the study product and no other etiology more likely explains the event. Associated adverse events are summarized by MedDRA System Organ Class.
Time frame: Day 1 through Day 49-63
Mean Days Missed From Normal Activities in the Per Protocol Population
As a quality of life measure, participants maintained a memory aid from Day 1 to Day 14 to track measures such as participation in normal life activities. The maximum number of days assessed, 14, was assigned to participants who had not yet resumed normal activities by the end of the assessment period.
Time frame: Day 1 through 14
Mean Days Missed From Normal Activities in the Intent to Treat Population
As a quality of life measure, participants maintained a memory aid from Day 1 to Day 14 to track measures such as participation in normal life activities. The maximum number of days assessed, 14, was assigned to participants who had not yet resumed normal activities by the end of the assessment period.
Time frame: Day 1 through 14
Number of Participants Reporting 1-14 Days of Analgesic Use in the Per Protocol Population
As a quality of life measure, participants maintained a memory aid from Day 1 to Day 14 to track measures such as use of other, non-study medications such as analgesics. Each participant is summarized by the last day of reported analgesic usage, from the start of treatment with study intervention. The maximum number of days assessed, 14, was assigned to participants who were still taking analgesic medications by the end of the assessment period.
Time frame: Day 1 through 14
Number of Participants Reporting 1-14 Days of Analgesic Use in the Intent to Treat Population
As a quality of life measure, participants maintained a memory aid from Day 1 to Day 14 to track measures such as use of other, non-study medications such as analgesics. Each participant is summarized by the last day of reported analgesic usage, from the start of treatment with study intervention. The maximum number of days assessed, 14, was assigned to participants who were still taking analgesic medications by the end of the assessment period.
Time frame: Day 1 through 14
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.