The aim of the study is to assess whether PTH (1-84) therapy posses advantages compared to conventional treatment in patients with hypoparathyroidism on muscle function, quality of life, calcium homeostasis, bone metabolism, and body composition.
Hypoparathyroidism is one of the only hormonal insufficiency states that is usually not treated by replacing the missing hormone. Currently, Standard therapy includes treatment with calcium and an 1alpha-hydroxylated forms of vitamin D (e.g. calcitriol or alphacalcidol) in order to relieve the symptoms associated with hypocalcaemia. However, recent studies have shown that calcium homeostasis can be well regulated by PTH replacement therapy in patients with hypoparathyroidism. It seems that PTH treatment is safe and that it even may posses advantages compared to conventional treatment with vitamin D. As the renal calcium excretion is decreased by PTH therapy, the risk of renal calcifications causing an impaired renal function may be reduced. In addition, some of the hypoparathyroid patients treated with PTH reported less fatigue and increased endurance in response to treatment. This may be due to either a better regulated (i.e. more physiological) calcium homeostasis during PTH therapy, or due to a direct effect of PTH on the neuromuscular system. Therefore, further studies are needed on the effects of PTH replacement in patients with hypoparathyroidism. Outcome measures: * Muscle- and balance function: Effects of treatment on muscle strength and balance function are determined using a dynamometer and a stadiometer (Meititur Ltd, Finland). In addition, effects of treatment on muscle function are assessed through muscle biopsies, electromyographic, echocardiography, and by biochemical measures (muscle enzymes). * Quality of life: Effect of treatment on indices of quality of life is assessed using the SF-36v2- and the WHO-Five Well-Being Index (WHO-5)-survey. * Calcium homeostasis, bone metabolism, and body composition. Effects of treatment are assessed by measurements of calcitropic hormones, biochemical markers of bone turnover, and iliac crest biopsies. In addition, bone mineral density and body composition is measured.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
62
preotact 100 microgram subcutaneous a day in 6 months
100 microgram placebo subcutaneous a day for 6 months
Osteoporoseklinikken, Aarhus University Hospital
Aarhus, Jutland, Denmark
Increase in maximal voluntary knee extension
Time frame: 6 months
Balance function: Is assessed using a stadiometer (Meititur Ltd, Finland)
Time frame: 6 months
Effect of treatment on indices of quality of life is assessed using the SF-36v2- and WHO-Five Well-Being Index (WHO-5)-survey.
Time frame: 6 months
Effects of treatment on muscle function are assessed through muscle biopsies, electromyographic, and by biochemical measures (muscle enzymes).
Time frame: 6 months
Bone mineral density and body composition is measured
Time frame: 6 months
Calcium homeostasis and bone metabolism. Effects of treatment are assessed by measurements of calcitropic hormones, biochemical markers of bone turnover, and bone biopsies
Time frame: 6 months
Q CT scan of hip and spine
Time frame: 6 months
Effects of treatment on diurnal variations of measured biochemical indices, as assessed at the end of the treatment period
Time frame: 24 hours at the end of the 6 month treatment period
Effects of treatment on indices of cardiovascular health (ECG and blood pressure), as measured at the end of the treatment period just prior to and 1 hour after injection of study medication.
Time frame: at the end of the 6 months treatment period
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.