The effects of none-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and selective cyclooxygenase inhibitors (Coxibs) on the formation of bone and fracture healing have been a matter of debate since long. There is, however, limited data in humans and further prospective randomised studies are warranted. Ekman et al studied in a prospective randomised double blind study the effects of celecoxib, a selective cox-II-inhibitor, on pain and bone healing following spine surgery. They found significant effects on reduction of pain and need for opioid analgesics postoperatively but could see no negative effects the numbers of "none-unions" at a 1-year follow up 3. In a similar prospective randomised double-blind study design significant effects in reduction of pain and need for rescue analgesia was seen from the use of celecoxib in the perioperative multi-modal pain strategy for cruciate-ligament reconstruction and no negative effects could bee seen on six month follow-up of the strength of the reconstructed ligament. The aim of the present study is to further study the effects of the perioperative use of etoricoxib, a selective cox-II-inhibitor (Coxibs), in a prospective randomised double-blind study on bone healing, pain and need for rescue analgesia in patients undergoing elective Hallux Valgus surgery with a standardised surgical technique including an osteotomy of metatarsale I and excision of exostosis. Study population 100 American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) physiological status1-2 patients scheduled for elective hallux valgus (HV) surgery The patients are going to be randomised into 2 groups, 50 patients in each; 1. etoricoxib 90 mg once daily x 5 2. tramadol 100 mg twice daily x 5 First line rescue medication t. paracetamol 1 gr up to 4 gram daily Second line rescue t. oxycodone 10 mg Primary study variables: * X-ray evaluation (computer tomography (CT)-investigation) of bone healing assessed a CT-scan modelling of the osteotomy at twelve weeks after surgery * Number of patients requiring rescue medication * Patient assessment using "brief pain inventory" 24 hours and 2 weeks after surgery Secondary study variables are; * Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) grading Day 1-7 * Compliance to base medication * Need for rescue analgesia Day 1-7 * Adverse Effects * Experience of any emetic symptoms * Experience of any gastrointestinal symptoms * Satisfaction with pain medication Day 20 * Wound dressing Day 20 * Clinical evaluation 17 weeks, final assessment
See brief summary
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
100
90 mg once daily
100 mg twice daily
Foot & Ancle Surgical Center
Stockholm, Sweden
Number of Patients Requiring Rescue Medication
Number of patients requiring any further pain medication
Time frame: 7 day study period
Summary of Pain Scores, Day 1-7 of Visual Analogue Scale Grading of Pain
VAS score 1-10 1=no pain 10 = worst possible pain, summary variable day 1-7; 7 - 70
Time frame: The first 7 days after surgery, during study pain medication
Compliance to Base Medication
Number of patients that did not discontinue study medication before day 7
Time frame: 7-day study period, during study medication
Gastro-intestinal Symptoms
Number of patients reporting any gastro-intestinal side effects; nausea and or vomiting, gastritis etc. assessed by patient and documented in written questionnaire
Time frame: during the 7- day pain medication period
Dizziness/Sleepiness
Number of patients that experienced dizziness/sleepiness/fatigue, assessed by patient and documented in written questionnaire
Time frame: During the 7-day pain medication period
Wound Healing
healing process assessed by a blinded physician during the final outpatient clinic visit assessment graded; Good/neutral/bad
Time frame: 16 week follow-up
Satisfaction With Pain Medication
satisfied or unsatisfied with study medication, assessed by patient in questionnaire
Time frame: during the first 20 days after surgery, 1st outpatient clinic visit
Patient Assessed Overall Satisfaction With Surgery/Outcome
overall satisfaction with outcome, patients assessed satisfaction with the surgical procedure; satisfied, neutral or unsatisfied, written questionnaire.
Time frame: 16 weeks
Patient Assessed Quality of Life
Quality of Life evaluated by grading on a Visual Analogue Scale in the written questionnaireisual analogue scale grading 0-100; 0 death and 100 perfect quality of life
Time frame: At 16-week post surgery follow-up
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.