The Press Fit Condylar (P.F.C.) Sigma Metal-backed Versus All-poly

DePuy International67 enrolled

Overview

The primary objective of this investigation was to evaluate \& compare the performance of the P.F.C. Sigma Knee Cruciate-retaining all-polyethylene and metal-backed tibia components using RSA. The secondary objectives of this investigation are to evaluate the clinical and patient outcomes and survivorship associated with the P.F.C. Sigma Knee Cruciate-retaining all-polyethylene and metal-backed tibia components.

Using RSA, is it possible to evaluate the performance of both the all polyethylene and metal backed tibia components to determine whether there are differences in migration, if present, across the tibial components. The original protocol intended to perform clinical assessment using the Nottingham Knee Score and the Knee Society Clinical rating system pre-and post-operatively, at six months, 1 year, and annually thereafter. Per Protocol Amendment 01 (effective June 18, 1999) clinical data would also be collected via the SF-12 questionnaire. Radiological evaluation would also use the Knee Society scoring system at the same time points. However, data collected included only the SF-12 and Oxford Knee Scores, comparing change from baseline at 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery.

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

SINGLE

Enrollment

Conditions

Knee Osteoarthritis

Interventions

PFC Sigma knee with all-poly tibial componentDEVICE

Orthopaedic implant for total knee replacement with an all-polyethylene tibial component

PFC Sigma knee with metal backed tibiaDEVICE

Orthopaedic implant for total knee replacement with a metal-backed tibial component

Eligibility

Sex: ALLMin age: 65 Years

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: * Subjects requiring a primary knee replacement. * Subjects aged 65 years or more. * Subjects who are able to give voluntary, written informed consent to participate in this clinical investigation and from whom consent has been obtained. * Subjects with a primary diagnosis of osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis. Exclusion Criteria: * Subjects who have had a previous surgery of the operative knee except menisectomy and arthroscopy. * Subjects who have had a renal transplant. * Subjects with a metabolic bone disorder. * Subjects who, in the opinion of the Clinical Investigator, have an existing condition, e.g. Paget's disease etc. that would compromise their participation and follow-up in this clinical investigation. * Subjects whose contralateral knee is already included in this study. * Subjects who have a history of active joint sepsis. * Subjects who have a recent history of high dose systemic corticosteroids. * Subjects with psycho-social disorders or physical disabilities that would limit rehabilitation. * Subjects requiring a bone graft.

Locations (1)

Department of Orthopaedics, Freeman Hospital

Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Using RSA it is possible to evaluate the performance of both the all-polyethylene and metal-backed tibia components to determine whether there are differences in migration between the two components

Time frame: 2 years

Secondary Outcomes

Comparative evaluation of any post-operative variation between subjects receiving all-polyethylene and metal-backed tibia components in change from baseline at each post operative time points in terms of SF 12 and OKS

Time frame: 6 months, 1 year and 2 years

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov

This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.