1. Assess the efficacy of varenicline, relative to placebo, on a performance based measure of cognition in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease 2. Evaluate the effects of varenicline on clinically relevant measures including attention and executive function, behavior, and clinician rated global change. 3. Evaluate the safety and tolerability of varenicline, relative to placebo, in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease 4. Evaluate the pharmacokinetics of varenicline in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
66
0.5 mg once daily for 1 week followed by 0.5 mg twice daily for 1 week followed by 1 mg twice daily for 4 weeks
Placebo once daily for 1 week followed by placebo twice daily for 5 weeks.
Pfizer Investigational Site
Seongnam, Gyunggido, South Korea
Pfizer Investigational Site
Busan, South Korea
Pfizer Investigational Site
Daegu, South Korea
Pfizer Investigational Site
Incheon, South Korea
Pfizer Investigational Site
Seoul, South Korea
Pfizer Investigational Site
Seoul, South Korea
Pfizer Investigational Site
Seoul, South Korea
Pfizer Investigational Site
Suwon, South Korea
Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale 75 (ADAS-Cog 75) at Week 6
12-item scale to assess severity of cognitive impairment in AD. Items include word recall, naming objects and fingers, following commands, constructional praxis, ideational praxis, orientation, word recognition, spoken language ability, comprehension of spoken language, word finding difficulty in spontaneous speech, remembering test instructions, and concentration/distractibility. Total score range from 0-75 with 75 indicating worse cognition.
Time frame: Week 6
Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale 75 (ADAS-Cog 75) at Week 3
12-item scale to assess severity of cognitive impairment in AD. Items include word recall, naming objects and fingers, following commands, constructional praxis, ideational praxis, orientation, word recognition, spoken language ability, comprehension of spoken language, word finding difficulty in spontaneous speech, remembering test instructions, and concentration/distractibility. Total score range from 0-75 with 75 indicating worse cognition.
Time frame: Week 3
Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale 70 (ADAS-Cog 70) at Week 3
11-item scale designed to assess the severity of cognitive impairments in AD subjects. Items include word recall, naming objects and fingers, following commands, constructional praxis, ideational praxis, orientation, word recognition, spoken language ability, comprehension of spoken language, word finding difficulty in spontaneous speech, and remembering test instructions. Total score range from 0-70 with 70 indicating worse cognition.
Time frame: Week 3
Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale 70 (ADAS-Cog 70) at Week 6
11-item scale designed to assess the severity of cognitive impairments in AD subjects. Items include word recall, naming objects and fingers, following commands, constructional praxis, ideational praxis, orientation, word recognition, spoken language ability, comprehension of spoken language, word finding difficulty in spontaneous speech, and remembering test instructions. Total score range from 0-70 with 70 indicating worse cognition.
Time frame: Week 6
Mean Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) Score at Week 6
CGI-I: 7-point clinician rated scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Improvement is defined as a score of 1 (very much improved), 2 (much improved), or 3 (minimally improved) on the scale. Higher score = more affected.
Time frame: Week 6
Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Total Score at Week 3
Caregiver interview-based rating scale assessing 12 behavioral disturbances occurring in dementia: delusions, hallucinations, agitation/aggression, depression/dysphoria, anxiety, elation/euphoria, apathy/indifference, disinhibition, irritability/lability, aberrant motor behavior, appetite/eating, and sleep. Each symptom score derived by frequency of symptoms \* severity of symptoms (range 0-12). Total score = sum of symptom scores; range: 0-144 with higher score indicating greater behavioral disturbances.
Time frame: Week 3
Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Total Score at Week 6
Caregiver interview-based rating scale assessing 12 behavioral disturbances occurring in dementia: delusions, hallucinations, agitation/aggression, depression/dysphoria, anxiety, elation/euphoria, apathy/indifference, disinhibition, irritability/lability, aberrant motor behavior, appetite/eating, and sleep. Each symptom score derived by frequency of symptoms \* severity of symptoms (range 0-12). Total score = sum of symptom scores; range: 0-144 with higher score indicating greater behavioral disturbances.
Time frame: Week 6
Computerized Test Battery for Cognition (CogState) Tasks: Detection at Week 1
Assessment of the cognitive domain psychomotor function through yes or no responses within 5 minutes to 30 trials; score range: 0 to 3.69. Performance variable: speed of performance; average of the log10 t transformed reaction time for correct responses. Reaction times longer than 5 seconds (log10 \[5000\]) were excluded as reflecting responses that were abnormally slow.
Time frame: Week 1
Computerized Test Battery for Cognition (CogState) Tasks: Detection at Week 3
Assessment of the cognitive domain psychomotor function through yes or no responses within 5 minutes to 30 trials; score range: 0 to 3.69. Performance variable: speed of performance; average of the log10 t transformed reaction time for correct responses. Reaction times longer than 5 seconds (log10 \[5000\]) were excluded as reflecting responses that were abnormally slow.
Time frame: Week 3
Computerized Test Battery for Cognition (CogState) Tasks: Detection at Week 6
Assessment of the cognitive domain psychomotor function through yes or no responses within 5 minutes to 30 trials; score range: 0 to 3.69. Performance variable: speed of performance; average of the log10 t transformed reaction time for correct responses. Reaction times longer than 5 seconds (log10 \[5000\]) were excluded as reflecting responses that were abnormally slow.
Time frame: Week 6
Computerized Test Battery for Cognition (CogState) Tasks: Continuous Paired Associate Learning (CPAL) at Week 1
Assessment of the cognitive domain visual episodic memory (associate learning) through responses within 7 minutes to 4 targets x 4 rounds (mild AD) or 3 targets x 4 rounds (moderate AD); score range: 35 to 100. Performance variable: number of errors made in correctly placing each of the 4 patterns in their location four times.
Time frame: Week 1
Computerized Test Battery for Cognition (CogState) Tasks: Continuous Paired Associate Learning (CPAL) at Week 3
Assessment of the cognitive domain visual episodic memory (associate learning) through responses within 7 minutes to 4 targets x 4 rounds (mild AD) or 3 targets x 4 rounds (moderate AD); score range: 35 to 100. Performance variable: number of errors made in correctly placing each of the 4 patterns in their location four times.
Time frame: Week 3
Computerized Test Battery for Cognition (CogState) Tasks: Continuous Paired Associate Learning (CPAL) at Week 6
Assessment of the cognitive domain visual episodic memory (associate learning) through responses within 7 minutes to 4 targets x 4 rounds (mild AD) or 3 targets x 4 rounds (moderate AD); score range: 35 to 100. Performance variable: number of errors made in correctly placing each of the 4 patterns in their location four times.
Time frame: Week 6
Computerized Test Battery for Cognition (CogState) Tasks: One Back Working Memory at Week 1
Assessment of the cognitive domain working memory through yes or no responses to 30 trials within 5 minutes; score range: 0 to 1.57. Performance variable: accuracy of performance; arcsine transformation of proportion correct responses.
Time frame: Week 1
Computerized Test Battery for Cognition (CogState) Tasks: One Back Working Memory at Week 3
Assessment of the cognitive domain working memory through yes or no responses to 30 trials within 5 minutes; score range: 0 to 1.57. Performance variable: accuracy of performance; arcsine transformation of proportion correct responses.
Time frame: Week 3
Computerized Test Battery for Cognition (CogState) Tasks: One Back Working Memory at Week 6
Assessment of the cognitive domain working memory through yes or no responses to 30 trials within 5 minutes; score range: 0 to 1.57. Performance variable: accuracy of performance; arcsine transformation of proportion correct responses.
Time frame: Week 6
Computerized Test Battery for Cognition (CogState) Tasks: Visual Learning at Week 1
Assessment of the cognitive domain episodic memory through yes or no responses within 5 minutes to 4 targets repeated among 6 distractors on 4 rounds (mild Alzheimer's disease \[AD\], or 3 targets repeated among 4 distractors on 4 rounds (moderate AD) ; score range: 0 to 1.57. Performance variable: accuracy of performance; arcsine transformation of proportion correct responses.
Time frame: Week 1
Computerized Test Battery for Cognition (CogState) Tasks: Visual Learning at Week 3
Assessment of the cognitive domain episodic memory through yes or no responses within 5 minutes to 4 targets repeated among 6 distractors on 4 rounds (mild Alzheimer's disease \[AD\], or 3 targets repeated among 4 distractors on 4 rounds (moderate AD) ; score range: 0 to 1.57. Performance variable: accuracy of performance; arcsine transformation of proportion correct responses.
Time frame: Week 3
Computerized Test Battery for Cognition (CogState) Tasks: Visual Learning at Week 6
Assessment of the cognitive domain episodic memory through yes or no responses within 5 minutes to 4 targets repeated among 6 distractors on 4 rounds (mild Alzheimer's disease \[AD\], or 3 targets repeated among 4 distractors on 4 rounds (moderate AD) ; score range: 0 to 1.57. Performance variable: accuracy of performance; arcsine transformation of proportion correct responses.
Time frame: Week 6
Computerized Test Battery for Cognition (CogState) Tasks: Identification at Week 1
Assessment of the cognitive domain visual attention through a yes or no response to 30 trials within 5 minutes; score range: 0 to 3.69. Performance variable: speed of performance; average log10 transformed reaction time for correct responses. Reaction times longer than 5 seconds ( log10 \[5000\]) were excluded as reflecting responses that were abnormally slow.
Time frame: Week 1
Computerized Test Battery for Cognition (CogState) Tasks: Identification at Week 3
Assessment of the cognitive domain visual attention through a yes or no response to 30 trials within 5 minutes; score range: 0 to 3.69. Performance variable: speed of performance; average log10 transformed reaction time for correct responses. Reaction times longer than 5 seconds ( log10 \[5000\]) were excluded as reflecting responses that were abnormally slow.
Time frame: Week 3
Computerized Test Battery for Cognition (CogState) Tasks: Identification at Week 6
Assessment of the cognitive domain visual attention through a yes or no response to 30 trials within 5 minutes; score range: 0 to 3.69. Performance variable: speed of performance; average log10 transformed reaction time for correct responses. Reaction times longer than 5 seconds ( log10 \[5000\]) were excluded as reflecting responses that were abnormally slow.
Time frame: Week 6
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.