The purpose of this study is to evaluate the benefits of anulus fibrosus repair utilizing Xclose™ compared to a discectomy without anulus fibrosus repair.
Discectomy surgery is intended to remove the impinging fragment on the nerve root thus alleviating the pain and providing the nerve with a better healing environment. Discectomy procedures entail removing a bony portion of the vertebral body to access the posterior side of the disc space, and then removing the impinging fragment from the disc. The fragment being removed can either be contained within the wall of the anulus, which requires incision into the anulus to remove it, or it could be extruded through an anular fissure. In the absence of a safe and easy method to close or seal the defect in the anulus following a discectomy procedure, surgeons are left with no alternative but to leave the anulus in this compromised state which is largely the current practice. This rent in the soft tissue of the anulus fibrosus can lead to postoperative problems if the remaining nuclear tissue in the disc pushes through the anular defect or incision causing recurrent or persistent pain. Initial studies involved the placement of sutures to seal the anular defect. This work strongly suggested that microsurgical anular reconstruction can reduce recurrent herniations and re-operations, post discectomy. Unfortunately, this technique is not easy to perform and may pose an increased risk to the patient. This study utilizes the Xclose™ Tissue Repair System to re-approximate the compromised tissue of the anulus fibrosus in appropriately randomized patients in an effort to quantify the benefits of anular repair for discectomy patients.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
750
Comparison of discectomy with and without repair to the anulus fibrosus of the intervertebral disc
Re-operations due to re-herniation (repeat discectomy procedure)
Time frame: 2 wks and at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months
Patient outcomes (utilizing Oswestry Disability Index, Visual Analog Scale and SF-12 quality of life assessment), Health care utilization, Return to work
Time frame: 2 weeks and at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
North Alabama Neurological, P.A.
Huntsville, Alabama, United States
Texas Back Institute
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Desert Institute for Spine Care
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
University of California San Diego
San Diego, California, United States
Denver Spine (Porter Hospital)
Greenwood Village, Colorado, United States
Denver Spine (Presbyterian/St. Luke's Hospital)
Greenwood Village, Colorado, United States
North Florida Regional Hospital
Gainesville, Florida, United States
Lyerly Neurosurgical (Baptist Health)
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
Mayo Clinic
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
Lyerly Neurosurgical (Centerone)
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
...and 24 more locations