Diastolic heart failure (DHF), which affects older individuals and women at a disproportionate rate, is a condition that can lead to shortness of breath and fluid build-up in the lungs. This study will evaluate the effectiveness of the medication sildenafil at improving exercise ability and health outcomes in people with DHF.
DHF is a condition in which one of the chambers of the heart, the left ventricle, loses its ability to relax completely because the muscle has become too stiff. When this occurs, the heart is unable to properly fill with blood, which can lead to decreased blood circulation. People with DHF may experience shortness of breath and pulmonary congestion, which is an abnormal build-up of fluid in the lungs. Current treatment for DHF includes guidelines/recommendations to lower blood pressure, stop smoking, and lose weight, but there are no medications available to specifically treat DHF. Sildenafil, commonly known as Revatio or Viagra, is a medication that increases the supply of blood to the lungs and reduces the workload of the heart. Preliminary studies have shown that sildenafil may be beneficial at improving heart and lung function in people with DHF, but more research is needed to confirm these findings. The purpose of this study is to determine if sildenafil can improve exercise ability and health outcomes in people with DHF. This 24-week study will enroll people with DHF. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either sildenafil or placebo three times a day for 24 weeks. Participants will attend study visits at baseline and Weeks 1, 4, 12, 13, and 24. At most study visits, the following procedures will occur: physical exam, medical history review, questionnaires, blood collection, 6-minute walk test to measure endurance, and an exercise test. At baseline and Week 24, participants will also undergo an electrocardiogram, which will measure the electrical activity of the heart, and a cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) procedure and an echocardiogram, which will both obtain pictures of the heart. At Weeks 3, 8, 16, and 20, study researchers will call participants to collect health information.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
216
Mayo Clinic Arizona
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Morehouse School of Medicine
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Exercise Capacity, as Determined by Peak Oxygen Uptake
Time frame: Change from Baseline to Week 24
Exercise Capacity, as Determined by Peak Oxygen Uptake
Time frame: Change from Baseline to Week 12
Exercise Capacity as Determined by Walk Distance
6 Minute Walk Distance
Time frame: Change from Baseline to Week 12
Composite Score Reflective of Clinical Status
Participants ranked sequentially with ranking stratified in one of three tiers based on: 1. Death (lowest tier) The person with the shortest time from randomization to death is given the lowest rank within the tier. 2. Hospitalizations due to cardiovascular or renal causes (middle tier) For patients alive, the ranking within this tier is based on time to hospitalization from randomization date. The person with the first cardiovascular or renal cause hospitalization will be given the lowest rank within the tier. 3. Change in Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLWHFQ) from baseline (highest tier) The use of three tiers within the ranking reflects the greater adverse impact of death or cardiovascular hospitalization on clinical status without an arbitrary assignment as to the relative value of these events in relation to changes in quality of life. Rank order: 1-189 (higher values are better)
Time frame: Measured at Week 24
Exercise Capacity as Determined by Walk Distance
6 minute walk distance
Time frame: Change from Baseline to Week 24
Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test (CPET) Duration
To interpret the CPET Exercise Duration change endpoints, an increase in exercise duration between Baseline and Week 12/Week 24 is considered to be an improvement
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Minnesota Heart Failure Network
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, United States
Baylor College of Medicine
Houston, Texas, United States
University of Utah Health Sciences Center
Murray, Utah, United States
University of Vermont - Fletcher Allen Health Care
Burlington, Vermont, United States
Montreal Heart Institute
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Time frame: Change from Baseline to Week 12
Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test (CPET) Duration
To interpret the CPET Exercise Duration change endpoints, an increase in exercise duration between Baseline and Week 12/Week 24 is considered to be an improvement
Time frame: Change from Baseline to Week 24
Ventilatory Anaerobic Threshold
To interpret the Ventilatory Anaerobic Threshold (VAT) change endpoints, an increase in VAT between Baseline and Week 12/Week 24 is considered to be an improvement
Time frame: Change from Baseline to Week 12
Ventilatory Anaerobic Threshold
To interpret the Ventilatory Anaerobic Threshold (VAT) change endpoints, an increase in VAT between Baseline and Week 12/Week 24 is considered to be an improvement
Time frame: Change from Baseline to Week 24
Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLWHFQ)
The MLWHFQ is a self-administered, disease-specific measure of health related quality of life (QOL) that assesses patients perceptions of the influence of heart failure on physical, socioeconomic and psychological aspects of life. Patients respond to 21 items using a six-point response scale (0-5). The total summary score can range from 0-105 with a lower score reflecting better heart failure related QOL. Two sub-scale scores reflect physical (8 items) and emotional (5 items) impairment. Total score: 0 - 105 Physical subscore: 0 - 40 Emotional subscore: 0 - 25
Time frame: Change from Baseline to Week 12
Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire
The MLWHFQ is a self-administered, disease-specific measure of health related quality of life (QOL) that assesses patients perceptions of the influence of heart failure on physical, socioeconomic and psychological aspects of life. Patients respond to 21 items using a six-point response scale (0-5). The total summary score can range from 0-105 with a lower score reflecting better heart failure related QOL. Two sub-scale scores reflect physical (8 items) and emotional (5 items) impairment.
Time frame: Change from Baseline to Week 24