The purpose of this study was to collect data to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of the OptiMesh 1500S to contain and reinforce bone graft materials in patients with Degenerative Disc Disease (DDD) whose condition requires an interbody spinal fusion procedure combined with posterior fixation.
Seventy-six thousand posterior interbody fusions are performed annually in the U.S., and it has been estimated that at least 50% of those cases include supplemental posterior instrumentation. For interbody fusion with posterior fixation, spine surgeons currently place structural intervertebral spacers into the interbody space. These spacers may be pre-shaped devices constructed of allograft (cortical bone dowels or femoral rings) or non-metallic, radiolucent materials, or metallic cage devices. Autogenous bone graft and blood components (marrow, blood) are often added. Use of morselized bone graft in orthopedic procedures is desirable because it is more rapidly incorporated during the course of bone healing. If the morselized graft pack can be effectively contained in the interbody space, the graft material can function as a structural spacer to provide anterior column support. Contained graft material can be tightly packed within the mesh to increase the graft's compressive strength. Unlike pre-shaped cortical grafts, the morselized pack conforms intimately to the host bone at the surgical site, ensuring good vascularization potential and reducing the osteoblast jumping distance for osteogenesis. In addition, the solidly packed graft retains intra-pack porosity, ensuring an osteoconductive scaffold to facilitate vascular and bony ingrowth. It would be desirable to minimize autograft use because of associated post-op pain, to optimize contact between allograft and host bone, and to permit the surgeon to place or construct an effective structural intervertebral spacer with only minimal neural retraction required. OptiMesh 1500S is intended to be used to contain the bone graft placed by spine surgeons into the interbody space to achieve spinal intervertebral body fusion. OptiMesh 1500S enables the use of morselized bone graft materials in spine fusion procedures instead of solid allograft materials, such as cortical bone dowels or femoral rings, or rigid synthetic materials. In addition, the OptiMesh instrument system allows the surgeon to perform an interbody fusion through a small portal and to complete the entire fusion procedure from a posterior approach instead of a 360 degree anterior/ posterior procedure, which is often the case with the use of cages. The minimal access portal utilized for OptiMesh filling allows the device to be placed via a unilateral transforaminal or translaminar approach, versus the often-used bilateral approach required for many cages and cortical spacers. This flexibility permits the surgeon to adapt the surgical approach to the local anatomy of the patient.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
156
Following disc space preparation the spacer is placed in accordance with cleared labeling and supplemental instrumentation is provided as an adjunct to fixation.
Following disc space preparation the OptiMesh is deployed and filled in accordance with study surgical technique and supplemental instrumentation is provided as an adjunct to fixation.
Olympia Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, United States
Kootenai Medical Center
Coeur d'Alene, Idaho, United States
Rush-Copley Medical Center
Aurora, Illinois, United States
Mean Change in Low Back Pain Score at 24-months Compared to Pre-op
A Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score was used to evaluate a subject's level of pain. The VAS is a 10 cm pain scale where a score of "0" represents "No Pain" and a score of "10" represents the "Worst Possible" pain. The magnitude of change in the 24-month score compared to the baseline score is calculated. A clinically meaningful change is defined as a 2 unit (cm) reduction at 24-months when compared to pre-op.
Time frame: 24 month
Mean Change in Back Function Score at 24-months Compared to Pre-op
A subject's back function was assessed by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). The ODI is a 10 question survey that evaluates the degree of functional impairment. Completion of the survey yields a score from "0" to "100" points. A score of "0" represents "No disability" and "100" represents "Total disability". The magnitude of change between the two timepoints is reported. A clinically meaningful improvement is defined as a 15 point reduction at 24-months compared to the pre-op score.
Time frame: 24 month
Number of Participants Determined to be a Fusion Success at 24 Months Post-operative
Fusion Success is defined as \<5 degrees angulation, \<10% translation, and presence of bridging bone on CT.
Time frame: 24 month
Number of Participants With a Serious Device and Procedure Related Adverse Event
The rate of serious device and procedure related adverse events are compared between the control and treatment arm from intraoperative through 24 months of follow-up.
Time frame: From Intra-op through the 24-month visit
Right Leg Pain Score--Change From Preop at the 24-month Timepoint
Right leg pain assessed by subject response on Visual Analog Scale (0-10 cm) where "0" represents "No pain" and "10" represents "Worst pain". The magnitude of change at 24-months compared to baseline is reported. A clinically relevant improvement is defined as a 2 cm reduction at 24-months compared to pre-op.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
St. Mary's Christus Hospital
Shreveport, Louisiana, United States
Providence Hospitals and Medical Center
Southfield, Michigan, United States
Methodist Hospital
Saint Louis Park, Minnesota, United States
Lakeview Hospital
Stillwater, Minnesota, United States
Alegent-Health Immanuel Medical Center
Omaha, Nebraska, United States
St. Charles Hospital
Port Jefferson, New York, United States
McLeod Health
Florence, South Carolina, United States
...and 1 more locations
Time frame: 24-month visit
Left Leg Pain--Change From Preop at the 24-month Timepoint
Left leg pain assessed by subject response on Visual Analog Scale (0-10cm) where "0" represents "No left leg pain" and "10" represents "Worst Pain". The magnitude of change at 24-months post-operative compared to the baseline score is reported. A clinically relevant improvement is defined as a 2 cm reduction at 24-months compared to pre-op.
Time frame: 24-month visit
Number of Participants Rating Their Procedure as Very Satisfied or Somewhat Satisfied at 24-months Postoperative
Subjects were asked to rate their satisfaction with their surgical procedure as "Very Satisfied", "Somewhat Satisfied", "Somewhat Dissatisfied" or "Very Dissatisfied" with their procedure
Time frame: 24-month visit