Compare the 30-day safety and efficacy of the GORE® Embolic Filter used in conjunction with FDA-approved carotid stents to a performance goal obtained from carotid stent studies utilizing distal embolic protection.
Continuous advances in angioplasty techniques and the development of low-profile, flexible, tapered nitinol stents designed specifically for carotid applications have made CAS a viable alternative to CEA. Advances in embolic protection technology will assist in moving CAS forward as a universally accepted procedure. While the GORE® Embolic Filter is similar in many ways to other currently available filters, it has been designed to provide optimal vessel wall apposition. Bench tests suggest that the wall apposition may provide improved filter efficiency, thereby minimizing embolization of particles downstream and potentially decreasing adverse clinical effects. In addition, preclinical testing suggests that the GORE® Embolic Filter has improved deliverability, including torque ability and lesion cross that may improve the ability of the system to access and treat tight lesions in tortuous anatomy. Thus, the purpose of this multi-center clinical study is to assess the safety and effectiveness of the GORE® Embolic Filter when used to provide cerebral embolic protection during carotid artery angioplasty and stenting.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
250
Embolic protection during carotid stenting
Composite Major Adverse Event (MAE) Rate of Death, Myocardial Infarction, and Stroke at 30 Days Postprocedure
Time frame: 30 days
Device Success
Device Success defined as the number of participants with Technical Success using the GORE Embolic Protection System (i.e., the GORE Embolic Filter device was delivered, placed, and retrieved as outlined in the Instructions for Use).
Time frame: Post Procedure
Clinical Success
Clinical Success defined as GORE Embolic Filter and carotid stent success in the absence of death, emergency endarterectomy, repeat PTA / thrombolysis of the target vessel, and stroke or MI as determined by the Clinical Events Committee. Clinical success will be evaluated from procedure through 24-48 hours postprocedure.
Time frame: 30 days
Access Site Complications
Access Site Complications defined as the presence of a large hematoma (\>5cm or requiring treatment or prolonged hospitalization), fistula or pseudoaneurysm formation, retroperitoneal bleeding or the need for surgical repair postprocedure.
Time frame: 30 days
Neurologic Events
Neurological Events at 30 days post-procedure, including transient ischemic attacks (TIAs).
Time frame: 30 days
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.