The PROTECT-PROvenge Treatment and Early Cancer Treatment trial was a Phase III trial for patients with hormone sensitive prostate cancer. The study was conducted at over 15 participating centers throughout the US. The purpose of the study was to determine if sipuleucel-T was effective for treatment of early stage, non-metastatic prostate cancer. The study compared the active vaccine to control to determine whether the product delayed the time until cancer progression.
This was a prospective, double blind, controlled, randomized trial of immunotherapy with prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP)-loaded autologous antigen presenting cells (APCs), in subjects with non metastatic prostate cancer. Subjects that qualified for this study were men who had previously undergone a prostatectomy and whose only sign of disease recurrence was a rise in serum prostate specific antigen (PSA). The primary objectives were to compare the time to biochemical failure (BF, PSA greater than or equal to 3 ng/mL) between sipuleucel-T (treatment group) and control, and to study the safety of sipuleucel-T. Following short-term open-label treatment with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone-analogue (LHRH-a), Subjects completed a checklist designed to compare androgen suppression-related side effects during periods with and without androgen suppression. Subjects who achieved a PSA of \< 1 ng/ml were randomized to blinded treatment assignments of either sipuleucel-T or control in a 2:1 ratio. Following randomization, subjects underwent 3 leukapheresis procedures on alternate weeks (Weeks 0, 2, and 4). Approximately three days following each leukapheresis procedure, subjects received an infusion of either sipuleucel-T or control. At the time BF was confirmed, subjects were eligible for a booster infusion. The booster process consisted of 1 leukapheresis procedure followed by 1 infusion of sipuleucel-T. The booster process, in effect under protocol amendment 5, differed from the previous booster process that consisted of 1 infusion of the same treatment assigned at randomization (sipuleucel-T or control). Subjects continued to be observed until DF was confirmed by bone scan or computed tomography (CT) scan, or other imaging modalities as clinically indicated. After confirmed DF, subjects were followed by telephone every 6 months for safety and survival, treatment-related AEs, any CVEs, or new therapies for prostate cancer.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
176
Autologous cellular product consisting of antigen presenting cells (APCs) prepared in the absence of PA2024 antigen.
Sipuleucel-T is an autologous cellular product consisting of antigen presenting cells (APCs) activated with PA2024, a recombinant fusion protein composed of prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP), linked to granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF).
Alta Bates Comprehensive Cancer Center
Berkeley, California, United States
South Orange County Medical Research
Laguna Hills, California, United States
Time to Biochemical Failure Cumulative Incidence Percentile
Time to Biochemical Failure (TTBF) was the pre-specified primary endpoint of this trial. The biochemical failure threshold was based on evidence that prostate specific antigen (PSA) had become ≥ 3 ng/mL
Time frame: Every 3 months post-infusion
Number of Subjects That Met Biochemical Failure Status
time to biochemical Failure (TTBF) was the pre-scpecified primary endpoint of this trial. The biochemical failure threshold was based on evidence that prostate specific antigen (PSA) had become ≥ 3 ng/mL.
Time frame: Every 3 months post-infusion
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
University of Colorado Health Sciences Center
Aurora, Colorado, United States
Oncology Specialists, SC
Park Ridge, Illinois, United States
Mount Sinai School of Medicine
New York, New York, United States
University of Rochester Medical Center
Rochester, New York, United States
McKay Urology
Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
AKSM Clinical Research Group
Columbus, Ohio, United States
Providence Medical Center
Portland, Oregon, United States
Oregon Health and Sciences University
Portland, Oregon, United States
...and 8 more locations